P. Liang et al. / Catalysis Communications 11 (2010) 560–562
561
generate the deuterium labeled trifluoroacetic acid (TFA-d) sol-
vent, then Pd(OAc) (0.05 mmol), Cu(OAc) (0.2 mmol), and ben-
zene (0.5 mL) were added in the resulting solvent in a glass tube
equipped with a glass lid with several holes for gas diffusion. The
glass tube was put into a 50 mL stainless autoclave, and the auto-
Table 2
The influence of water content in the CO
2
-expanded solvent.a
Phenol (mmol)
2
2
Run
H O (mL)
2
Biphenyl (mmol)
Total yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
Non
0.25
0.5
1.0
2.0
0.19
0.25
0.30
0.47
0.33
0.17
0.13
0.11
0.07
0.10
10.1
11.2
16.5
17.9
13.5
clave was charged with CO
2
(40 atm) first, then oxygen (20 atm).
The charged autoclave was stirred at 84 °C in an oil bath (temper-
1
ature 95 °C) for 16 h. The product analysis was performed by
H
a
NMR with an internal standard sample.
Conditions: TFA (5 mL), Pd(OAc)
0.5 mL), CO (40 atm), O (20 atm), 84 °C, 16 h.
Based on benzene added.
2
(0.05 mmol), Cu(OAc)
2
(0.2 mmol), benzene
(
2
2
b
3
. Results and discussion
0
.47 mmol by adding 1 mL of water to the total 5 mL of TFA sol-
The catalytic activation and functionalization of the C–H bond
in benzene using CO -expanded solvent was generally investigated
with simple palladium(II) acetate catalyst and oxygen as the termi-
nal oxidant. To enhance the electrophilic attack capability of the
Pd(II) species, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was selected as the organic
vent, and 17.9% of the total yield could be achieved, even that
the yield of phenol dropped from 0.17 mmol to 0.07 mmol. When
2
2
.0 mL of water were added in 5 mL TFA, yield of biphenyl dropped
to 0.33 mmol with the total yield of 13.5%, while the yield of phe-
nol slightly increased up to 0.1 mmol. In that case, it became a bi-
phasic system upon the addition of benzene, which apparently
disturbed the reaction. Thus, a water content tuning the ratio of
biphenyl/phenol products was observed for this Pd/Cu catalyzed
C–H bond activation. Such a phenomenon is very rare in the elec-
trophilic C–H activation process, since it is generally believed that
the presence of water would block the attack of the late transition
metal ions like Pd(II) on the unfunctional substrates [12,13]. A
plausible explanation for the role of water would be that the pres-
ence of the reasonable amount of water could promote the disso-
ciation of TFA to increase the proton concentration which plays
the role in re-oxidation of Pd(0) to the active Pd(II) by dioxygen.
composition of this CO
summarized in Table 1. At 84 °C, using Pd(OAc)
charged 40 atm of CO and 20 atm of oxygen, it provided
.16 mmol of biphenyl, 0.047 mmol of phenol products, and the
2
-expanded medium. The reaction data are
2
catalyst with
2
0
corresponding total yield was 6.5% based on benzene substrate.
At the end of the reaction, a palladium black precipitate was gen-
erally observed, indicating the deactivation of catalyst. In order
to accelerate the regeneration of the active Pd(II) species, Cu(OAc)
2
was selected as the co-catalyst, because it had already demon-
strated its efficient capability in re-oxidizing Pd(0) to the Pd(II)
species in Wacker process [9]. Indeed, addition of the Cu(II) ion
could improve the yield of phenol (0.17 mmol) substantially and
the total yield went up to 10.1% from 6.5%. An alternative choice
to prevent palladium black formation is to add certain ligands to
the Pd(II) ion [10]. However, the selected ligand, (+)-sparteine,
did not prevent the aggregation of the Pd(0) atom, otherwise,
bipyridine (bpy) or 1,10-phenannthroline (phen) caused complete
loss of catalytic activity although the aggregation was inhibited. In
the partial oxidation of methane to methanol, trifluoroacetic anhy-
dride (TFAA) was introduced to convert methanol into methyl ester
for preventing its further oxidation [11]. At the early consideration
of avoiding further oxidation of phenol and removing the water
Fig. 1 displays the influence of CO
activity. Charging of CO to generate a CO
remarkably improved the catalytic efficiency. For examples, with-
out CO charged, the yield of biphenyl and phenol were only
.34 mmol and 0.05 mmol, respectively, with the total yield of
2.9%, even that 1 mL of water have been added to accelerate the
were charged, 0.48 mmol of biphe-
2
pressure on the catalytic
2
2
-expanded medium
2
0
1
reaction. When 30 atm of CO
2
nyl and 0.063 mmol of phenol could be achieved with the total
yield of 18.1%, indicating an extra 40% improvement of catalytic
activity by simply charging CO
the CO -expanded TFA is not currently available because of the
equipment limit, a similar system, that is, the CO -expanded acetic
2
. Although the phase behavior of
2
generated during the reaction, little TFAA were added for esterifi-
1
2
cation of phenol product. Indeed, no phenol was detected by
H
2
acid, has demonstrated improved dioxygen solubility and CO -ex-
panded behavior [7]. Thus, it can be expected that the increased
NMR in the reaction mixtures as expected, while the yield of biphe-
nyl remained unchanged. However, only minor ester products
1
were monitored by H NMR. Because the considerably high yield
of phenol (0.17 mmol) was obtained in the absence of TFAA, the
addition of TFAA had apparently compressed the phenol formation.
After realizing the negative effect of TFAA in phenol formation,
biphenyl
phenol
0.6
total yield
2
the influence of water content in the CO -expanded solvent was
1
8
investigated and the results are listed in Table 2. Obviously, the
presence of reasonable amount of water would accelerate the cat-
alytic reaction. The yield of biphenyl increased from 0.19 mmol to
0.5
0.4
16
14
12
10
0.3
Table 1
-expanded medium.a
2
The results for catalytic C–H activation in benzene in the CO
Total yield (%)c
0.2
0.1
Run
Additives
–
Biphenyl (mmol)
Phenol (mmol)
1
2
3
0.16
0.19
0.19
0.16
Non
Non
0.047
0.17
Non
0.098
Non
6.5
10.1
6.7
7.4
Non
Non
Cu(OAc)
Cu(OAc)
2
b
2
4
5
6
(+)-Sparteine
bpy
phen
0.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Non
CO pressure (atm)
2
a
Conditions: Pd(OAc)
2
(0.05 mmol), Cu(OAc)
2
(0.2 mmol), or organic ligand
(20 atm), 84 °C, 16 h.
(
0.1 mmol), TFA (5 mL), benzene (0.5 mL), CO
2
(40 atm), O
2
Fig. 1. The influence of CO
2
pressure on the catalytic activity. Conditions: TFA
5 mL), water (1 mL), Pd(OAc) (0.05 mmol), Cu(OAc) (0.2 mmol), benzene
0.5 mL), O (20 atm), 84 °C, 16 h.
b
c
TFA (4 mL), TFAA (1 mL).
Based on benzene added.
(
(
2
2
2