larities with C and D. Ligand E differs from C by virtue of
its bulky bicyclic backbone, and from D in that it bears a
bulkier phenyl group rather than a methyl group on the
thiazole moiety. This is consistent with the observations of
Mazet and co-workers that the reaction is highly sensitive to
the catalyst structure, hence the steric accessibility of the
catalysts could be crucial to our system. A catalyst made
from an even bulkier ligand F gave high yield while main-
taining a high enantioselectivity (>99% ee, Table 1, entry 6)
and was therefore tested in the isomerization of a broad
range of primary allylic alcohols.
Table 3. Asymmetric isomerization of Z-trisubstituted primary allylic al-
cohols.
[
a]
1
2
[b]
[c]
[9]
Entry
R
R
Yield
%]
ee
[
[%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Me
Et
iPr
Cy
Me
Me
14
38
42
50
n.a.
50
>99 (S)
>99 (S)
>99 (R)
>99 (R)
n.a.
98 (S)
[d]
[d]
A
H
U
G
R
N
U
G
3
2
A
H
U
G
R
N
U
G
2 2
(CH )
Cy
E-trisubstituted allylic alcohols were evaluated first
(
Table 2). Aromatic allylic alcohols with bulky alkyl sub-
[a] Each result is the average from two reactions. No E/Z isomerization
of the allylic alcohols was detected. [b] Isolated product yields. [c] Deter-
mined by chiral GC/MS. Absolute configurations were determined by
comparing the optical rotations of the product to literature values (for
details, see the Supporting Information). [d] Not applicable.
1
stituents (R =iPr and Cy) gave excellent yields, as well as
high enantioselectivities (Table 2, entries 1 and 2). An aro-
matic allylic alcohol with a linear alkyl group on the double
1
bond (R =Et) was isomerized with a similar enantioselec-
tivity (97% ee), but the yield decreased dramatically
(
(
Table 2, entry 3). When the substituent was even smaller
R =Me), the enantioselectivity was only marginally affect-
merization of 3,3-dialkyl allylic alcohols was also attempted.
Nerol was a challenging substrate (Table 3, entry 5), but a
substrate with a larger substituent (Z)-3-cyclohexylbut-2-en-
1-ol was isomerized to the corresponding aldehyde in mod-
erate yield and with excellent enantioselectivity (Table 3,
entry 6).
1
ed, but the aldehyde was recovered in poor yield (Table 2,
entry 4). Thus the catalytic asymmetric isomerization of an
allylic alcohol was significantly impacted by the size of its
1
substituents (R ). An aromatic group was not required, as a
+
À
series of 3,3-dialkyl allylic alcohols were isomerized as well.
Just as was the case for aromatic allylic alcohols, 3,3-dialkyl
allylic alcohols with larger substituents were isomerized
more effectively (Table 2, entries 5–8).
More challenging Z-trisubstituted allylic alcohols were
isomerized using the same catalyst (Table 3). Aromatic allyl-
ic alcohols, interestingly, supplied the desired aldehydes in
uniformly high enantioselectivities, regardless of the steric
properties of their substituents (Table 3, entries 1–4). Yields
were moderate for these substrates except when a very
In summary, [(F)Ir ACHTUNGTREUNNNG( cod)] ACHTUNGERTNNUNG[ BAr ] catalyzed a highly
F
enantioselective asymmetric isomerization of a range of
E- and Z- trisubstituted primary allylic alcohols to the corre-
sponding chiral aldehydes. Notably, the selectivity of this
catalyst was less sensitive to steric effects in the asymmetric
isomerization of Z-trisubstituted allylic alcohols than E-tri-
substituted compounds.
Experimental Section
2
small substituent was present on the double bond (R =Me,
General procedure: A 10 mL microwave tube containing the iridium cat-
Table 3, entry 1), the yield was observed to be poor. The iso-
+
À
alyst [(L*)Ir
A
H
U
G
R
N
U
(cod)]
A
H
U
G
R
N
N
[BAr
F
]
(8 mg) and sealed with a septum was evacu-
three times. Thereafter, dry THF (2 mL) was
ated and refilled with N
2
added. The septum was pierced with a needle and the vessel was sealed
in a hydrogenation bomb. After eight cycles of applying and venting
Table 2. Asymmetric isomerization of E-trisubstituted primary allylic al-
cohols.
2
3 bar of argon, the tube was pressured to 3 bar with H and allowed to
react for 10 min, during which time the orange solution became yellow.
The vessel was vented and removed from the bomb, and the solution was
degassed through three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. Allylic alcohol
(
0.1 mmol) was then added as a stock solution (0.33m) in dry THF, and
[
a]
1
2
[b]
[c]
[10]
Entry
R
R
Yield
%]
ee
2
the reaction was stirred under N for 17 h.
[
[%]
1
2
Cy
iPr
Et
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
86
88
21
>99 (S)
>99 (S)
97 (R)
91 (R)
94 (S)
95 (S)
96 (R)
>99 (R)
[
[
[
[
d]
d]
d]
d]
3
4
5
6
7
8
Acknowledgements
<5
A
C
H
T
U
N
G
T
R
E
N
N
U
N
G
(CH
3
)
2
C=CH
A
H
U
G
R
N
U
G
2
)
2
11
24
79
40
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR), the
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, AstraZeneca, VR/SIDA, Nord-
Forsk & Nordic Energy Research, the Swedish energy agency and SYN-
FLOW (FP7). We also would like to thank Dr. T. L. Church for careful
reading of the manuscript. J.-Q.L. thanks the China Scholarship Council
for a fellowship.
tBuCH
Cy
tBu
2
[
a] Each result is the average from two reactions. No E/Z isomerization
of the allylic alcohols was detected. [b] Isolated product yields. [c] Deter-
mined by chiral GC/MS. Absolute configurations were determined by
comparing the optical rotations of the product to literature values (for
details, see the Supporting Information). [d] Trace amounts of the a,b-un-
saturated aldehyde were observed (ref. [3b]).
Keywords: aldehydes
·
allylic alcohols
·
asymmetric
catalysis · iridium · isomerization · N, P ligands
11144
ꢁ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11143 – 11145