LETTER
RuHCl(CO)(PPh ) -Catalyzed Chemoselective Transfer-Hydrogenation of Enones
723
3
3
reduction, leading to the saturated ketone 2b (entry 2). On
the other hand, the reduction of 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-
one (1c) was very sluggish. As a result, overreduction to
the saturated alcohol 3c occurred as a competing reaction
[Ru]-H
O
O
[
Ru]–H
[Ru]
O
isomerization
1i
OH
O
(
entry 3). Other cyclic unsaturated ketones, 2-cyclopent-
reduction
en-1-one (1d) and 2-cyclohepten-1-one (1e), were re-
duced at the C=C bond to give the saturated ketones, 2d
and 2e, respectively (entries 4 and 5). The reduction of
OH
H
2
-cyclohepten-1-one (1e) was sluggish under the standard
[Ru] H
O
O
conditions used, but when the amount of Ru-
HCl(CO)(PPh ) was increased to 5 mol% and 10 mol%,
3
3
reduction
the complete reduction of 1e resulted (entries 6 and 7).
The acyclic unsaturated ketone 1f was also reduced in
good yield (entry 8). On the other hand, 4-methoxy-3-
buten-2-one (1g), containing a methoxy group at the b-
position, was not reduced (entry 9). The reduction of
benzylideneacetone (1h) proceeded smoothly to give sat-
urated ketone 2h in 97% yield (entry 10). In contrast, the
reduction of 1i to 2i was very sluggish (entries 11 and 12).
We also examined the reaction of 5-hexen-2-one (1j),
containing an olefin portion at the 4-position (entry 13).
After three hours, the saturated ketone 2j was obtained in
moderate yield along with unsaturated isomers, 3-hexen-
[
Ru]–H
[
Ru]–H
O
OH
isomerization
2i
Scheme 1 Possible mechanism of transfer-hydrogenations
References and Notes
(1) For reviews on transfer-hydrogenation, see: (a) Brieger, G.;
Nestrick, T. J. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74, 567. (b) Johnstone, R.
A.; Wilby, A. H.; Entwistle, I. D. Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 129.
(c) Zassinovich, G.; Mestroni, G.; Gladiali, S. Chem. Rev.
2
-one (30%) and 4-hexen-2-one (15%). Increasing the
amount of catalyst used to 10 mol% resulted in the smooth
6
alkene-isomerization and transfer-hydrogenation to give
1
992, 92, 1051. (d) Noyori, R.; Hashiguchi, S. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1997, 30, 97. (e) Bäckvall, J.-E. J. Organomet. Chem.
002, 652, 105.
2
j in 75% yield (entry 14). In the case of 6-methyl-5-hep-
ten-2-one (1k), containing a trisubstituted olefin, the re-
duction was sluggish presumably due to steric congestion
2
(
2) (a) Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 8; Trost, B. M.,
(
entries 15 and 16).
Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991, 551–553; and
references cited therein. (b) Sasson, Y.; Blum, J.
A possible mechanism for the reaction is shown in
Scheme 1, in which hydrogen-transfer reductions of a,b-
unsaturated ketones have been proposed to proceed via
Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 2167. (c) Sasson, Y.; Blum, J. J.
Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 1887. (d) Bianchini, C.; Farnetti, E.;
Graziani, M.; Peruzzini, M.; Polo, A. Organometallics 1993,
12, 3753. (e) Bhaduri, S.; Sharma, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1988, 173. (f) Bhaduri, S.; Sharma, K.; Mukesh,
D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 1191.
2
c,d
ruthenium p-oxaallyl intermediates: (i) isomerization
to the a,b-unsaturated ketones, (ii) coordination and acti-
vation of the hydrogen acceptor, (iii) coordination of the
hydrogen donor, (iv) hydrogen transfer, and (v) the
release of the product. Another path via the formation of
unsaturated alcohols followed by alkene isomerization to
the saturated ketones is also possible, although the forma-
tion of unsaturated alcohols as a by-product was not
observed in this study.
(
g) Chowdhury, R. L.; Bäckvall, J.-E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1991, 1063. For transfer-hydrogenation of
ketones to alcohols, see: (h) Leadbeater, N. E. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 2168. (i) Cho, C. S.; Kim, B. T.; Kim, T.-J.; Shim,
S. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 9020. (j) Haack, K.-J.;
Hashiguchi, S.; Fujii, A.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 285. (k)Yamakawa,M.;Ito,
H.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1466.
In conclusion, the highly chemoselective transfer-hydro-
genation of a,b-unsaturated ketones to the saturated
ketones catalyzed by RuHCl(CO)(PPh ) under mild con-
ditions is reported. This method is also effective for the
selective reduction of other enones, having a remote C=C
bond.
(
2
l) Santosh Laxmi, Y. R.; Bäckvall, J.-E. Chem. Commun.
000, 611. (m) Ma, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, L.; Cui, X.; Zhu, J.;
Deng, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2103. (n) Guo, R.; Chen, X.;
Elpelt, C.; Song, D.; Morris, R. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1757.
3
3
7
(
o) Yamaguchi, K.; Koike, T.; Kotani, M.; Matsushita, M.;
Shinachi, S.; Mizuno, N. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6574.
3) (a) Bianchini, C.; Farnetti, E.; Frediani, P.; Graziani, M.;
Peruzzini, M.; Polo, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
(
1
991, 1336. (b) Xue, D.; Chen, Y.-C.; Cui, X.; Wang, Q.-
Acknowledgment
W.; Zhu, J.; Deng, J.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3584.
(c) For Zr-catalyzed transfer-hydrogenation of enones to
allylic alcohols, see: Nakano, T.; Umano, S.; Kino, Y.; Ishii,
Y.; Ogawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 3752. (d) Ir:
Bianchini, C.; Farnetti, E.; Graziani, M.; Nardin, G.; Vacca,
A.; Zanobini, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9190.
I.R. acknowledges a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priori-
ty Areas (A) ‘Reaction Control of Dynamic Complexes’ from
MEXT, Japan for financial support. T.F. also acknowledges a
Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from MEXT Japan for finan-
cial support.
Synlett 2006, No. 5, 721–724 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York