Scheme 1
To begin with, the pair of narrow doublets appearing
upfield of chloroform at δ 6.56 and 6.51 (J ) 5.2 Hz)
signifies the presence of an unsaturated, external five-
membered ring; for comparison, the corresponding signal
in the 1H NMR spectrum of acecorannulene (5)11 appears at
δ 6.49 (s, 2H). The fact that two doublets are observed in
1
the H NMR spectrum of the isolated product, instead of a
singlet, further indicates a lack of symmetry. Furthermore,
the singlet at δ 7.53 appears in the same chemical shift range
as that for the singlet from the hydrogens R to the
five-membered ring on the core of acecorannulene (5, δ
7.38).11 Finally, the pair of two-hydrogen multiplets at δ 8.47
1
and 7.68 in the H NMR spectrum is similar in chemical
shift and fine structure to the AA′BB′ pattern (δ 8.68 and
7.76) in the spectrum of benzo[a]corannulene (6),12 suggest-
ing that the new C26H12 ring system has a benzo group
annulated to its core. On the basis of these spectral data, the
only plausible chemical structure for the major product
obtained from pyrolysis of 2 is benzo[a]acecorannulene (4).
Like acecorannulene (5), hydrocarbon 4 exhibits a high
sensitivity to alumina and silica gel, which imposes signifi-
cant losses of material with each chromatography. From the
1
material balance and the H NMR spectrum of the initial
pyrolysate, we estimate the actual yield of 4 to fall in the
range of 15-20%. Material purified to the level of that
shown in Figure 1 was obtained in low yield by semi-
preparative HPLC.
The 7,10-bis(2-bromophenyl)acenaphtho[1,2-d]pyridazine
(2) used for these experiments was synthesized using Boger’s
1,2,4,5-tetrazinef1,2-diazine strategy.16 This involved the
synthesis and inverse electron demand Diels-Alder (IEDDA)
reaction of the acenaphthenone-derived enamine 17 and 3,6-
bis(2-bromophenyl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine (16) (Scheme 2).
The synthesis of 1,2,4,5-tetrazine 16 was achieved using
an approach originally developed by Stolle´.17 Thus, acylation
of acylhydrazine 10 with 2-bromobenzoyl chloride (11)
afforded diacylhydrazine 12. Reaction of 12 with PCl5 gave
a mixture of 1,3,4-oxadiazole 13 (31%) and bis(chloroimine)
14 (36%). The formation of two products is an interesting
contrast to analogous syntheses of diaryl-1,2,4,5-tetrazines
by Heuschmann, in which either the bis(chloroimine) or the
1,3,4-oxadiazole was obtained depending upon the steric
requirements of the aryl groups.18 This was expected to be
of little consequence in view of Heuschmann’s report that
Although the mechanism for formation of this unexpected
product is not immediately obvious, one possibility is
outlined in Scheme 1. This proposal suggests that the desired
aza-bowl (1) is, in fact, formed as the initial product but
that the molecule is too unstable at high temperatures to
survive.10 Cleavage of one aryl-nitrogen bond would
generate carbene 7, which could shuffle its carbon atoms in
a Jones rearrangement,13 via 8, to give the isomeric phenyl
carbene 9. A subsequent cyclization with loss of dinitrogen
would lead to hydrocarbon 10. From there, a well-prece-
dented five/six-ring swap rearrangement14 would separate the
five-membered rings from each other and ultimately produce
the stable product, benzo[a]acecorannulene (4). Variations
on this mechanism that involve earlier loss of dinitrogen
would also account for the observed results.15
(14) (a) Scott, L. T.; Roelofs, N. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5461.
(b) Scott, L. T.; Roelofs, N. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6857. (c) Scott,
L. T.; Hashemi, M. M.; Schultz, T. H.; Wallace, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 9692. (d) Scott, L. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 291. (e)
Necula, A.; Scott, L. T. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2000, 54, 65.
(15) One such alternative has been suggested by a referee, and a slightly
modified version of this proposal is included in the Supporting Information.
We emphasize that both proposed mechanisms are speculative and that at
least one of them is incorrect.
(16) (a) Boger, D. L. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 33, 1519. (b) Boger,
D. L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1990, 99, 599. (c) Boger, D. L.; Weinreb, S.
M. Hetero Diels-Alder Methodology in Organic Synthesis; Academic
Press: New York, 1989. (d) Boger, D. L. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 781. (e)
Boger, D. L. Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 2869.
(9) (a) Bratcher, M. S. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston College, 1996. (b)
Bratcher, M. S.; Scott, L. T. Abstracts of Papers, 207th National Meeting
of the American Chemical Society; American Chemical Society: Wash-
ington, D. C.: San Diego, CA, March 1994; abstr ORGN 420.
(10) See, for example: (a) MacBride, J. A. H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1972, 1219. (b) Barton, J. W.; Rowe, D. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1983, 24, 299. (c) Wilcox, C. F., Jr.; Lassila, K. R.; Kang, S. J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 4333.
(11) Sygula, A.; Abdourazak, A. H.; Rabideau, P. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 339.
(12) (a) Mehta, G.; Srirama Sarma, P. V. V. Chem. Commun. 2000, 19.
(b) Peng, L.; Scott, L. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16518.
(13) Gaspar, P. P.; Hsut, J.-P.; Chari, S.; Jones, M., Jr. Tetrahedron 1985,
41, 1479.
(17) Stolle´, R. J. Prakt. Chem. 1906, 73, 277.
(18) Hartmann, K.-P.; Heuschmann, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 4213.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 23, 2006
5197