M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, A. Garelli, P. Melchiorre, A. Umani-Ronchi
FULL PAPER
trometer. Chemical shifts δ are reported in ppm from tetramethylsi-
lane as the external standard (TMS: δ ϭ 0.0 ppm). GC-MS spectra
were taken by EI ionization at 70 eV with a HewlettϪPackard 5971
with GC injection. They are reported as m/z (%). Flash column
chromatography was performed on 270Ϫ400 mesh silica gel. An-
shi, T. Busujima, S. Nagayama, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
1
3
579Ϫ1582; T.-P. Loh, L.-L. Wei, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
23Ϫ326. [
11c]
FriedelϪCrafts reaction: J. S. Yadav, S. Abra-
ham, B. V. S. Reddy, G. Sabitha, Synthesis 2001, 2165Ϫ2168.
[11d]
Aziridiation: S. Sengupta, S. Mondal, Tetrahedron Lett.
[11e]
2
000, 41, 6245Ϫ6248.
oue, M. Yasuda, A. Baba, Synlett 1997, 699Ϫ700.
reaction: B. C. Ranu, A. Hajra, U. Jana, J. Org. Chem. 2000,
Allylation reaction: T. Miyai, K. In-
hydrous CH
were purchased from the Fluka and Co. and from Aldrich and used
as received. CDCl and CD Cl were dried over activated molecu-
2
Cl
2
, CH
3
CN, Et
2
O, THF, n-pentane, TMSCN, and 1
[11f]
Biginelli
65, 6270Ϫ6272. [
11g]
Azidolysis of epoxycarboxylic acids: F.
3
2
2
lar sieves. Elemental analyses were carried out with an EACE 1110
CHNOS analyser. IR analysis were performed with an FT-IR NIC-
OLET 205 spectrophotometer. IR spectra are expressed by wave-
Fringuelli, F. Pizzo, L. Vaccaro, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
3554Ϫ3558. [
11h]
Y. Onishi, T. Ito, M. Yasuda, A. Baba, Eur. J.
[
11i]
Org. Chem. 2002, 1578Ϫ1581.
Sakurai reaction: P. H. Lee,
Ϫ1
K. Lee, S. Sung, S. Chang, J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8646Ϫ8649.
K. Inoue, A. Sawada, I. Shibata, A. Baba, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
number in cm . All the commercially available ketones were
freshly distilled or crystallised before use. The azetedinone 43 was
crystallised from n-pentane before use. The substituted ketones
2
002, 124, 906Ϫ907.
[
12] [12a]
Dithioacetalization: M. A. Ceschi, L. de Araujo Felix, C.
[
15] [34a] [15]
[34b]
[15]
[15]
3,
5,
9, 11,
13, and 15 were prepared by literature
[12b]
Peppe, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9695Ϫ9699.
nucleophilic addition: M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, M. Giacomini,
Tandem
procedures. The ketone 25 was synthesised by methylation of the
commercially available ethyl (2-hydroxyphenyl) ketone (MeI/
P. Melchiorre, S. Selva, A. Umani-Ronchi, J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 3700Ϫ3704. [
12c]
Michael addition: M. Bandini, P. Mel-
K
2
CO
3
, H
2
O/acetone, yield 91%).
chiorre, A. [ Melloni, A. Umani-Ronchi, Synlett 2002,
12d]
General Procedure for the InBr
TMSCN to Ketones: Anhydrous CH
.03 mmol) and carbonyl compound (3 mmol) were placed, under
nitrogen, in a flame-dried two-necked flask. The mixture was
stirred until the indium tribromide was completely dissolved
3
-Mediated Catalytic Addition of
1110Ϫ1114.
Stereoselective ring-opening of epoxides: M.
2
Cl (2 mL), InBr (11 mg,
2
3
Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, P. Melchiorre, A. Umani-Ronchi, J. Org.
Chem., 2002, 67, 5386Ϫ5389.
0
[
13] [13a]
Rearrangement of homoallylic alcohols: T.-P. Loh, K.-T.
Tan, Q.-Y. Hu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2921Ϫ2922.
[
13b]
Cyclization: T.-P. Loh, Q.-Y. Hu, K.-T. Tan, H.-S. Cheng,
(5Ϫ10 min). Finally, TMSCN (4.5 mmol, 560 µL) was introduced
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2669Ϫ2672. [
ans: T.-P. Loh, Q.-Y. Hu, L.-T. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
23, 2450Ϫ2451.
13c]
Synthesis of tetrahydrofur-
dropwise by syringe. This clear solution was then stirred at room
temperature until the disappearance of the ketone (1Ϫ3 h, checked
by TLC). The reaction was then quenched with a saturated
1
[14] [14a]
B. C. Ranu, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 2347Ϫ2356. [14b] K.
NaHCO
3
solution (3 mL) and extracted with Et
SO
2
O (3 ϫ 3 mL). The
) and concentrated
K. Chauhan, C. G. Frost, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000,
3015Ϫ3019.
2000, 33, 16Ϫ22.
organic portions were collected, dried (Na
2
4
[14c]
G. Babu, P. T. Perumal, Aldrichimica Acta
under reduced pressure, and the crude product mixture was puri-
fied by flash chromatography. For data of the different products,
see Supporting Information.
[15]
M. Bandini, P. G. Cozzi, P. Melchiorre, A. Umani-Ronchi, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3041Ϫ3043. InF has already been
3
studied as a catalyst (30 mol %) in the cyanation of aldehyde
compounds in water (see: T.-P. Loh, K.-C. Xu, D. S.-C. Ho,
K.-Y. Sim, Synlett 1998, 369Ϫ370); aliphatic and aromatic ke-
tones did not undergo cyanation with TMSCN in this catalytic
procedure, however.
For a recent example of catalytic cyanation of ketones by
LiOR, see: H. S. Wilkinson, P. T. Grover, C. P. Vandenbossche,
R. P. Bakale, N. N. Bhongle, S. A. Wald, C. H. Senanayake,
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 553Ϫ556.
Acknowledgments
[
16]
This work was financially supported by the MURST, Rome (Pro-
getto Nazionale Stereoselezione in Sintesi Organica Ϫ Metodologie
ed Applicazioni) and by Bologna University (Funds for selected
research topics). We are also grateful to Professor Antonio Arcelli
[17]
V. I. Cohen, R. E. Gibson, L. H. Fen, R. De la Cruz, M. S.
(University of Bologna) for stimulating discussions.
Gitter, E. Harimen, R. C. Rebe, J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34,
2989Ϫ2993.
[
[
[
18]
19]
20]
A. E. Vougioukas, H. B. Kagan, Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28,
5513Ϫ5516.
When tributyltin cyanide was used as the cyano source, 2 was
obtained in lower yield (62%).
The chemical yields obtained by the solvent screening are as
2 3
follow: Et O: 85%; CH CN: 81%; n-pentane: 71%; THF: 7%;
toluene: 90%. It is important to note that the success of this
method depends on the use of rigorously anhydrous solvents.
2 2
In fact, if the cyanation reaction of 1 was carried out in CH Cl
that had not been dried or distilled, the chemical yield dropped
[
[
1]
2]
R. J. H. Gregory, Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3649Ϫ3682.
A. Fujii, S. Sakaguchi, Y. Ishii, J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
6
209Ϫ6212, and references cited therein.
[
[
[
[
[
3]
S. Matsubara, T. Takai, K. Utimoto, Chem. Lett. 1991,
1
447Ϫ1450.
4] [4a]
Y. Yang, D. Wang, Synlett 1997, 861Ϫ868. [4b] Y. Ya n g , D.
Wang, Synlett 1997, 1379Ϫ1380.
P. Saravanan, R. V. Anand, V. R. Singh, Tetrahedron Lett.
5]
6]
7]
1
998, 39, 3823Ϫ3824.
P. G. Gassman, J. J. Talley, Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19,
773Ϫ3776.
W. J. Greenlee, D. G. Hangauer, Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24,
559Ϫ4560.
significantly, to 28% (reaction time 48 h, InBr 10 mol %)
3
[21]
L. H. Foley, J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5204Ϫ5209.
3
[22] R. Mart ´ı n, P. Romea, C. Tey, F. Urp ´ı , J. Vilarrasa, Synlett
1997, 1414Ϫ1415.
4
[
[
8]
9]
[23]
G. Jenner, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 491Ϫ494.
J. K. Whitesell, R. Apodaca, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
D. Russowsky, R. Z. Petersen, M. N. Godoi, R. A. Pilli, Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9939Ϫ9942.
[24]
2
525Ϫ2528.
The composition of the reaction product was determined by
[
10]
1
M. Curini, F. Epifanio, M. C. Marcotullio, O. Rosati, M. Rossi,
H NMR analysis of the crude mixture. The higher reaction
Synlett 1999, 315Ϫ316.
rate of 21 in comparison with 25 is explained in terms of a
reduction in the transition state energy associated with pre-
formation of the indium/25 complex. The more selective sub-
strate is therefore the more reactive.
[
11] [11a]
DielsϪAlder reaction: T.-P. Loh, J. Pei, M. Lin, Chem.
Commun. 1996, 2315Ϫ2316. [
Pei, G.-Q. Cao, Chem. Commun. 1996, 1819Ϫ1820. S. Kobaya-
11b]
Aldol reaction: T.-P. Loh, J.
3248
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3243Ϫ3249