.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 2: Ruthenium-catalyzed cyclization of the ortho-(alkynyloxy)-
benzylamines 1c–l to the 1,3-benzoxazines 2c–l.[a,b]
metal-catalyzed cyclizations remain scarce. Rhodium-cata-
lyzed allylic rearrangement of 2-(allyloxy)benzylamines,[13]
[14]
À
copper-catalyzed C H bond oxidative activation
and
photooxidation of aminoalcohols with photoredox catalysts
of iridium[15] and ruthenium[16] are the most remarkable
contributions. Herein we report a new and efficient ruthe-
nium-catalyzed cyclization of ortho-(alkynyloxy)benzyl-
amines towards 1,3-benzoxazines under very mild reaction
conditions (Scheme 1d).
The reaction was optimized using N-benzyl-1-[2-(prop-2-
yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]methanamine (1a) as the test substrate
(Table 1). The reaction of 1a with TMSCHN2 in the presence
Table 1: Optimization of the ruthenium-catalyzed cyclization of
N-benzyl-1-[2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]methanamine 1a.[a]
Entry
[Ru] catalyst
TMSCHN2 (equiv)
Yield [%][b]
[a] Typical reaction conditions: [Ru] (5 mol%), 1 (1 equiv), TMSCHN2
(2.1 equiv), [1]=0.25m, RT. [b] Yields of the isolated products.
[c] [Cp*Ru(cod)Cl], (10 mol%). [d] [Cp*Ru(cod)Cl], (10 mol%), 1,4-
dioxane as solvent, 658C.
1
2
3
4
[Cp*Ru(cod)Cl]
[CpRu(cod)Cl]
[Cp*Ru(CH3CN)3]PF6
[Cp*Ru(CH3CN)3]PF6/
NEt4Cl
[Cp*Ru(cod)Cl]
[Cp*Ru(cod)Cl]
[Cp*Ru(cod)Cl]
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
62
–
[c]
–
10
5
6
7
2.1
3.0
46[d]
50
derivatives (Table 2). Electron-withdrawing and electron-
donating aryl substituents are tolerated since the 1,3-benzox-
azines 2c–f were obtained in reasonably good yields. Thus,
para-methoxy-, para-methyl-, para-trifluoromethyl-, and even
para-bromobenzylamine smoothly gave the substituted 1,3-
benzoxazines 2c–f, with slightly better yields obtained for
substrates bearing electron-poor substituents in the position
para to the propargylic ether. Interestingly, the functionalized
4-, 5-, and 6-halo-substituted benzylamines could be effi-
ciently converted into their corresponding halo-substituted
1,3-benzoxazines 2 f–i in fairly good yields. Further manipu-
lation of the above aryl bromides and chlorides using
palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions provide an
easy entry to polysubstituted benzoxazines.[19] Notably, cycli-
zation of the naphthylamine derivative 1j smoothly gave the
naphthoxazine 2j in very good yield. Gratifyingly, the non-
terminal benzylamine derivative 1k also cyclized to give 2k in
very good yield,[20] albeit with a longer reaction time
compared to that of 2 f (60 h versus 6 h) and the need for
a higher catalyst loading (10 mol%). Even a benzylamine
with a long-chain-substituted alkyne, that is, 1l, was able to
cyclize to the corresponding 1,3-benzoxazine 2l, albeit in low
yield. In all cases the benzoxazines 2 were isolated with
complete Z stereoselectivity for the silylated double bond.
We proceeded to investigate the effect of the N- and
propargylic substitutions on the course of the reaction
(Table 3). Gratifyingly, the presence of primary and secon-
dary alkyl substituents on the nitrogen atom of the benzyl-
amines 1, for example, cyclohexyl or propyl, allowed the
corresponding 1,3-benzoxazines 2m and 2n to be obtained in
very good yields.[21] The chemoselectivity of the reaction was
analyzed in the cyclization of the N-allyl-substituted benzyl-
amine 1q, from which 2q, with an intact allyl group, was
isolated in moderate yield. Interestingly, this result indicates
[e]
[f]
–
–
[a] Typical reaction conditions: [Ru] (5 mol%), 1a (0.3 mmol),
[1a]=0.25m, RT. [b] Yields of isolated products. [c] N-benzyl-N-methyl-1-
[2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)phenyl]methanamine (1a’) was obtained (9%).
[d] Cp*Ru(cod)Cl, (10 mol%). [e] N2CHCOOEt (2.1 equiv) was used.
[f] Ethyl 2-(benzyl(2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)benzyl)amino)acetate 1a’’ was
obtained in 51% yield. cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene, Cp*=C5Me5.
of [Cp*RuCl(cod)] (5% mol) in Et2O at room temperature
gave 2a in 62% yield (entry 1). The reaction was extremely
sensitive to the electronic and steric nature of the ruthenium
catalyst since the starting material was totally recovered upon
using [CpRuCl(cod)] (entry 2). Besides, cationic [Cp*Ru-
(CH3CN)3PF6] or in situ formation of a neutral ruthenium
catalyst, by treatment with Et4NCl,[17] dramatically affected
either the course of the reaction or the catalytic activity, thus
giving very low yields of the methylated starting material 1a’
(9%)[3,18] or 2a (10%), respectively (entries 3 and 4).
Curiously, an increase in the catalyst loading or the amount
of TMSCHN2 was not beneficial for the cyclization reaction,
with 2a isolated in slightly lower yields (entries 5 and 6). The
nature of the solvent was crucial as other cyclic ethers such as
1,4-dioxane or THF were tolerated but gave lower yields, but
bulkier ethers and more polar protic or halogenated solvents
were detrimental to the cyclization.[18] Electronic variation on
the diazoalcane dramatically affected the course of the
reaction since the a-aminoester 1a’’, derived from the
[3]
À
carbenoid N H insertion reaction, was obtained when
N2CHCOOEt was used (entry 7).[18]
Once the optimized reaction conditions were established,
the scope and limitations of the cyclization reaction were
explored by starting with electronically distinct benzylamine
2
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!