J. CHEM. RESEARCH (S), 1998 281
Table 2 Reactions of phenols and phenylpropynoic acid to form coumarins
Main peak in
300 MHz
Mass
spectrum
m/z M /% 8C
Yield
(%)
Mp (lit.)/
1
Compound
R0
R000
t/min
1H NMR (d)
ꢀmax/cm
6
7
8
H
m-OMe
H
H
10
10
10
69.5
55.0
67.0
6.42 (s, 1 H)
6.28 (s, 1 H)
6.20 (s, 1 H)
1710, 1620, 1240
1700, 1630, 1220
1690, 1620, 1260
222/60
252/54
252/46
102±104(10513
)
H
p-OMe
138a
101±103b
aFound: C, 76.29, H, 4.51. C16H12O3 requires C, 76.18; H, 4.79%. bFound: C, 76.06, H, 4.70. C16H12O3 requires C, 76.17; H, 4.77%.
NaHCO3 solution, brine and dried over Na2SO4. Evaporation of
the solvent in vacuo yielded the product, 1.05 g (82%). 1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): ꢁ 7.29±7.26 (d, J 4, 1 H), 7.11±7.08 (t, J 4,
4 H), 6.99±6.97 (d, J 4, 1 H), 6.89±6.86 (d, J 4, 2 H), 4.32±4.28
(t, J 6 Hz, 1 H), 3.79 (s, 3 H) and 3.09±2.94 (m, 2 H). Mass
Similarly, when phenol (or its derivatives) and phenyl-
propynoic acid (or its derivatives) were subjected to MWI
in the presence of montmorillonite K-10 clay with one drop
of H2SO4 and placed in a silica bath, coumarins 6±8
(Scheme 2) were obtained in good yield as shown in Table 2.
spectrum (m/z, % base): 255/24 (M 1), 254/100 (M ), 253/5
(M 1), 149/4 and 148/17. 13C NMR (CDCl3/phase on DEPT):
ꢁ 167.827, 159.005, 151.681, 132.240, 128.643/ve, 128.310/ve,
126.250, 124.659/ve, 117.097/ve, 114.502/ve, 55.320/ve,
39.900/ve and 37.210/ ve. IR (CCl4, cm 1): 1760, 1240, 1160
and 750±710.
We are grateful to the CSIR, New Delhi, for providing
®nancial assistance for this work.
Received, 11th November 1997; Accepted, 27th January 1998
Paper E/7/08103K
Scheme 2
References
The results of the spectral data were compared with the
data for analogs or similar systems.11 The most relevant
resonance in the 13C NMR spectrum is at d 167±168, corre-
sponding to the carbonyl carbon. Condensation reactions
involving resorcinol or its monomethyl ether with cinnamic
acid, resulting in products 2, 3 and 7, proceed at the 4 not
at the 2 position: thus the product available through this
route will exclusively be the 7- and not the 5-substituted
derivative.12
1 J. D. Simpson and H. Stephen, J. Chem. Soc., 1956, 1382.
2 P. Sebok, J. Jeko, T. Timar and J. Cs. Jaszberenyi, Tetrahedron
Lett, 1992, 33, 2791.
3 J. E. Pickett and P. C. Van Dort, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33,
1161.
4 A. J. Hoefnagel, E. A. Gunnewegh, R. S. Downing and H. Van
Bekkum, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 225.
5 L. Crombie, R. C. F. Jones and C. J. Palmer, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin. Trans. 1, 1987, 317.
6 S. Setha and R. Phadke, Org. React. (N.Y.), 1953, 7, 1.
7 D. D. Chaudhari, Chem. Ind., 1983, 568.
Experimental
8 G. L. Kad, J. Kaur, P. Bansal and J. Singh, J. Chem. Res. (S),
1996, 188.
Montmorillonite K-10 clay was purchased from Fluka.
Typical Procedure.ÐTo activated montmorillonite K-10 clay (2 g)
in a 100 ml Erlenmeyer ¯ask was added a mixture of freshly distilled
phenol (0.50 g, 5.3 mmol) and recrystallized p-methoxycinnamic
acid (0.94 g, 5.3 mmol) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 ml) along with one
drop of concentrated H2SO4. The solvent was evaporated and the
resultant free-¯owing solid placed on a silica bath and subjected
to MWI at 640 W for 10 min. Dichloromethane (20 ml) was added,
the reaction mixture ®ltered and the ®ltrate washed with saturated
9 G. L. Kad, I. R. Trehan, J. Kaur, S. Nayyar, A. Arora and J. S.
Brar, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B, 1996, 35, 734.
10 V. Singh, J. Singh, K. P. Kaur and G. L. Kad, J. Chem. Res.
(S), 1997, 58.
11 K. K. Chan, Tetrahedron, 1977, 33, 899.
12 N. S. Narasimhan and R. S. Mali, Synthesis, 1983, 957.
13 F. Bergmann, M. Weizmann, E. Dimant, J. Patai and
J. Szmuskowicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1948, 70, 1612.