Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Brief Article
3-Hydroxycyclopent-1-enecarboxylic Acid (1). 3-((tert-
Butyldimethylsilyl)oxy)cyclopent-1-enecarboxylic acid (3.17 g, 13.08
mol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (130 mL) in a polypropylene vial,
and H2SiF6 (aq, 20−25% wt, 2.3 mL, 3.9 mmol) was added. The
solution was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Satrated Na2CO3
(100 mL) and water (50 mL) were added, and the aqueous phase was
washed with diethyl ether (2 × 20 mL). The aqueous phase was made
acidic by the addition of HCl (aq, 4M) and extracted with ethyl acetate
(4 × 150 mL). The combined organic phase was dried (MgSO4) and
the solvent removed in vacuo to give a white solid. CC (2:1 heptane/
ethyl acetate + 2% AcOH) gave a white solid. Recrystallization
(acetonitrile) gave the product as white crystals (1.26 g, 75%); mp
binding site over 45 different receptors and transporters. The
high selectivity of 1 combined with a ligand efficiency22 of 1.05
kcal/mol establish 1 as a highly interesting compound for
further studying the high-affinity GHB binding site.
Brain Penetration Studies. The brain to plasma
distribution ratio of GHB, 1, and NCS-382 was investigated
acutely in mice 30 min after oral administration of 10 mg/kg.
All three compounds were found to be brain penetrant,
reflected by their brain to plasma ratios of 0.20, 0.37, and 0.38
for GHB, 1, and NCS-382, respectively. Considering the
carboxylic acid group shared by all three compounds, often
associated with restricted passive brain penetration, these
results may suggest an involvement of active transport across
the blood−brain barrier. This hypothesis was supported by
assessment of the in vitro permeability using MDCK-MDR1
cells23 which showed that GHB, 1, and NCS-382 all exhibited
very low passive permeability. Thus, after spiking of test
compounds on either the apical or basal side of the cell
monolayers, no compound could be detected at the respective
receiver sides.
1
134−136 °C. H NMR (CD3OD): δ 1.71 (m, 1H), 2.30−2.48 (m,
2H), 2.62−2.70 (m, 1H), 4.86−4.91 (m, 1H), 6.63−6.65 (m, 1H). 13C
NMR (CD3OD): δ 30.81, 34.23, 77.65, 139.93, 144.72, 168.62. Anal.
Calcd for C6H8O3: C, 56.24; H, 6.29. Found: C, 56.34; H, 6.17. LC-
MS (system B): (M − H2O)H+: 111.1.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
Experimental data for compounds (3c, 4c, 6, 7, [2H]-5b, [2H]-
1), description of stability studies, in vitro pharmacological
methods, and NIMH-PDSP screening results. This material is
CONCLUSION
■
In conclusion, we have developed a new preparative synthetic
route to 1 that can be scaled up with a high and reproducible
overall yield. The new synthesis can readily be developed
further for carbon labeling. Compound 1 is stable during
storage and has a favorable selectivity profile when tested
against other relevant targets. Furthermore, compound 1 was
successfully tritium labeled using in situ generated lithium
trimethoxyborotritide. The incorporation of one tritium atom
proceeded in high radioactive yield, with close to theoretical
specific activity and with high radiochemical purity. Binding of
[3H]-1 could be displaced by GHB and 1 in a concentration-
dependent manner and not by the GABAB receptor agonist
baclofen. This new radioligand will be useful for further
understanding the molecular mechanism of GHB at its high-
affinity binding site and α4βδ GABAA receptors and for
elucidating the pharmacology of the GHB system in the
mammalian CNS, given the brain permeability of 1, for instance
through ex vivo or in vivo labeling of the binding sites with
positron-emitting or other isotopes.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
■
*M.H.F.P. (radiochemistry): phone, +45 31 12 27 64; E-mail,
Author Contributions
⊥S.B.V. and A.M. contributed equally.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by the Lundbeck Foundation
(S.B.V.), the Danish Medical Research Council (T.B.), and
the Drug Research Academy (T.B.). A.M.’s fellowship at the
Hevesy laboratory was founded by The International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA) (C6/CZR/11001). This work was
supported by the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
(RVO: 61388963) We gratefully acknowledge the Prague
institute for access to tritium NMR. Dr. Steve White is kindly
acknowledged for generously organizing the NIMH-PDSP
compound screen (contract no. HHSN-271-2008-00025-C).
The NIMH PDSP is directed by Bryan L. Roth MD, Ph.D. at
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Project
Officer Jamie Driscol at NIMH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
[3H]-3-Hydroxycyclopent-1-enecarboxylic Acid ([3H]-1). Ca-
reer free 3H2 (13.8 Ci) trapped on a uranium bed (as uranium tritide)
was released by heating (500 °C) and directed in a tritium manifold
into a dried reaction vial (1 mL two-necked round-bottom flask).
N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylethylenediamine (50 μL) was added. n-Butyl
lithium (100 μL, 160 μmol, 1.6 M in hexane) was added dropwise, and
within 10 min a white precipitate of Li3H was formed. After 2 h of
vigorous stirring, trimethyl borate (18 μL, 160 μmoles) was added and
ABBREVIATIONS USED
■
3
the reaction was stirred for 30 min to generate LiB(OMe)3 H. A
GHB, γ-hydroxybutyrate; HOCPCA, 3-hydroxycyclopent-1-
enecarboxylic acid; NCS-382, (2E)-(5-hydroxy-5,7,8,9-tetrahy-
dro-6H-benzo[a][7]annulen)-6-ylidene ethanoic acid
solution of propyl 3-oxo-cyclopent-1-en carboxylate (4c) (15 mg, 89
μmol) in THF (300 μL) was added dropwise, and the reaction was
stirred for 2 h. Solvents were lyophilized. Water (500 μL) was added,
and a sample showed predominantly [3H]-5b by HPLC analysis (95%,
245 nm). Aqueous NaOH (2 M, 100 μL) was added, and the reaction
was stirred for 1 h. The reaction mixture was neutralized with 1N HCl
to reach pH 6. Water was lyophilized and the solid residue dissolved in
accurate amounts of water. Then 1/10 of the crude mixture was used
for qualitative and quantitative analysis (see SI). Preparative HPLC
gave [3H]-1 ((97%, 245 nm), 637 mCi, 28.9 Ci/mmol) as white solid.
3H NMR (320 MHz, DMSO-d6/H2O 10:1): δ 4.71 (s). MS (ESI):
128.9 (100, M − 1).
REFERENCES
■
(1) Bernasconi, R.; Mathivet, P.; Bischoff, S.; Marescaux, C. γ-
Hydroxybutyric acid: an endogenous neuromodulator with abuse
potential? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1999, 20, 135−141.
(2) Drasbek, K. R.; Christensen, J.; Jensen, K. γ-Hydroxybutyratea
drug of abuse. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2006, 114, 145−156.
(3) Carter, L. P.; Koek, W.; France, C. P. Behavioral analyses of
GHB: receptor mechanisms. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 121, 100−114.
D
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm4011719 | J. Med. Chem. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX