7878 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 32, 2001
DaVis et al.
N-1
acceptor molecule. Expressions describing the temperature and
free energy dependencies of kET must be reevaluated under these
circumstances.12 Equation 1, which is derived for the high-
temperature limit, nevertheless predicts an Arrhenius-like tem-
perature dependence for kET. In particular, when reactions occur
at high temperature in the Marcus normal region, where the
driving force is smaller than the total reorganization energy,
Marcus theory is often adequate.13-15 However, for reactions
occurring in the Marcus inverted region, the influence of high-
frequency vibrational modes5,6,16,17 can lead to ET rate constants
with very weak temperature dependence, or even complete
temperature independence.7,15,18-20 Non-Arrhenius temperature
dependence can also be found in ET systems in which slow
solvent relaxation controls the ET reaction.21-29 This is espe-
cially pronounced in glass forming organic solvents and proteins,
where the temperature dependence of the ET rate constants will
change below the glass transition temperature of the medium.30-36
V
DBVBA VBB
HDA
)
(2)
(
)
ωDB ωDB
In eq 2, VDB and VBA are the electronic coupling strengths of
the donor and bridge and bridge and acceptor, respectively, VBB
is the electronic coupling between bridge sites, ωDB is the energy
gap between the relevant states of the donor and bridge, and N
is the number of identical bridge sites. Equation 2 is approximate
and does not take into account nonnearest neighbor interactions
and multiple pathways.42 Torsional motions will primarily affect
the electronic coupling between adjacent electronic sites, and
will impart an angular dependence to Vij (i,j nearest neighbors)
of the form
Vij ) Vij0 cos(Φ)
(3)
where Φ is the torsional angle and Vij0 is the electronic coupling
between sites i and j at Φ ) 0°. If Φ is temperature dependent,
this will impart a temperature dependence to HDA that may
override the normal Arrhenius-like temperature dependence of
kET expected from semiclassical ET theory. For example, the
Condon approximation will fail when conformations with small
Boltzmann populations have anomalously large HDA values.
The above discussion of the temperature dependence of HDA
assumes that the ET system under consideration falls into a
superexchange regime. In particular, for eq 2 to hold, the
requirements of second-order perturbation theory must be met
by a particular DBA molecule. Several theoretical treatments
have now been developed to describe DBA systems in which
ET does not occur via the superexchange mechanism.45-50 In
particular, the most important situation in which the superex-
change mechanism breaks down occurs when the energy gap
between donor and bridge (or acceptor and bridge) is of the
same order of magnitude as the electronic coupling between
the donor and the bridge, VDB. When the energy gap separating
electron donor and bridge becomes small, the rate-limiting step
of the ET reaction becomes thermal promotion of the electron
from the donor to the bridge. This promotion occurs primarily
through the coupled vibrational modes, and the observed
activation energy is approximately the energy gap separating
donor and bridge. The implication of this result is that the bridge
becomes a real intermediate state with electronic population
residing on it for finite times. This contrasts with superexchange,
where the bridge serves as a tunneling barrier separating the
donor and acceptor, and electronic population does not usually
reside on it for any reasonable time. In this paper, we describe
the temperature dependence of both photoinduced charge
separation (CS) and thermal charge recombination (CR) in the
DBA series, 1-5,51 which undergoes a change in electron-
transfer mechanism from superexchange to bridge localization
Of all the vibrational modes available to conjugated organic
donor-bridge-acceptor (DBA) molecules, those associated with
donor-bridge and bridge-acceptor torsional motions are
expected to contribute the most to variation of HDA. In addition,
any other torsional motions within D, B, or A will also
contribute. From the McConnell analysis of electronic coupling
in organic radical exchange reactions,37 HDA can be ap-
proximated in the following form38-44
(10) Bechtold, R.; Kuehn, C.; Lepre, C.; Isied, S. S. Nature 1986, 322,
286-288.
(11) Brunschwig, B. S.; Sutin, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7454-
7465.
(12) Beratan, D. N.; Hopfield, J. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 5753-
5759.
(13) Kroon, J.; Oevering, H.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Warman, J. M.; Oliver,
A. M.; Paddon-Row: M. N. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5065-5069.
(14) O’Driscoll, E.; Simon, J. D.; Peters, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112.
(15) Liang, N.; Miller, J. R.; Closs, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111,
8740-8741.
(16) Bixon, M.; Jortner, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 1941-1944.
(17) Kestner, N. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 1270-1275.
(18) Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1970, 8, 259-271.
(19) Gunner, M. R.; Dutton, P. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3400-3412.
(20) Smit, K. J.; Warman, J. M.; de Haas, M. P.; Paddon-Row, M. N.
Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 152, 177-182.
(21) Zusman, L. D. Chem. Phys. 1980, 49, 295-304.
(22) McGuire, M.; McLendon, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2549-2551.
(23) Sumi, H.; Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84.
(24) Rips, I.; Jortner, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 133, 411-414.
(25) Akesson, E.; Johnson, A. E.; Levinger, N. E.; Walker, G. C.; de
Bruil, T. P.; Barbara, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 7859-7862.
(26) Grote, R. F.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 4465-4475.
(27) Heitele, H.; Michel-Beyerle, M. E.; Finckh, P. Chem. Phys. Lett.
1987, 138, 237-243.
(28) Rempel, U.; von Maltzan, B.; von Borczyskowski, C. Z. Phys. Chem.
1991, 170, 107-116.
(29) Wiederrecht, G. P.; Svec, W. A.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Phys. Chem.
B 1999, 103, 1386-1389.
(30) Harrison, R. J.; Pearce, B.; Beddard, G. S.; Cowan, J. A.; Sanders,
K. M. Chem. Phys. 1987, 116, 429-448.
(31) Chen, P.; Danielson, E.; Meyer, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92,
3708-3711.
(42) Beratan, D. N.; Betts, J.; Onuchic, J. N. Science 1991, 252, 1285-
1288.
(32) Gaines, G. L.; O’Neill, M. P.; Svec, W. A.; Niemczyk, M. P.;
Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 719-721.
(33) Harriman, A.; Heitz, V.; Ebersole, M.; van Willigen, H. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 4982-4989.
(43) Hsu, C. P.; Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 584-598.
(44) Onipko, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 292, 267-272.
(45) Skourtis, S.; Mukamel, S. Chem. Phys. 1995, 197, 367-388.
(46) Davis, W. B.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Ratner, M. A.; Mujica, V.;
Nitzan, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 6158-6164.
(47) Segal, D.; Nitzan, A.; Davis, W. B.; Wasielewski, M. R.; Ratner,
M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 3817-3829.
(48) Okada, A.; Chernyak, V.; Mukamel, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102,
1241-1251.
(34) Hoffman, B. M.; Natan, M. J.; Nocek, J. M.; Wallin, S. A. Struct.
Bonding 1991, 75, 85-108.
(35) Hoffman, B. M.; Ratner, M. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 243, 233-
278.
(36) Agmon, N.; Rabinovich, S. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7270-7286.
(37) McConnell, H. M. J. Chem. Phys. 1961, 35, 508-515.
(38) Ratner, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 4877-4883.
(39) Evenson, J. W.; Karplus, M. Science 1993, 262, 1247-1249.
(40) Meade, T. J. Metal Ions in Biological Systems; Sigel, A., Sigel, H.,
Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1996; Vol. 33, p 453.
(41) Miller, J. R.; Beitz, J. V. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 6746-6756.
(49) Felts, A. K.; Pollard, W. T.; Friesner, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
99, 2929-2940.
(50) Pollard, W. T.; Felts, A. K.; Friesner, R. A. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1996,
93, 77-134.
(51) Davis, W. B.; Svec, W. A.; Ratner, M. A.; Wasielewski, M. R.
Nature 1998, 396, 60-63.