52
X. Li et al. / Dyes and Pigments 106 (2014) 51e57
high-efficiency red-electroluminescence devices based on a bt-
ligated iridium complex [(bt)2Ir(dipba)] by use of an easily avail-
able amidinate as auxiliary ligand.
1H), 7.78 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59e7.55 (t, 3H), 7.49e7.46 (m, 3H),
7.36e7.33 (t, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, TMS): 166.91, 154.04,
140.48, 140.22, 135.15, 132.22, 129.05, 127.19, 126.52, 126.15, 125.45,
123.67, 123.15, 121.77, 120.38, 120.30, 109.83.
In addition, the performance of the device is greatly influenced
by the charge balance between the electrons and holes from
opposite electrodes. Therefore, it’s highly desirable that the
designed phosphor shows the improved charge-transporting fea-
tures. Carbazole unit as a successful example has been introduced
into transition-metal-based complexes to promote their charge
carrier injection and transport ability [27e33]. Lately, we intro-
duced carbazole unit into bt ligand by flexible alkoxy chain forming
functional (cbbt)2Ir(acac) complex, which exhibited improved
electrophosphorescent performances [34]. Unfortunately, due to
the twisting motion of the flexible alkoxy chain which facilitated
the nonradiative decay channels, (cbbt)2Ir(acac) didn’t serve as very
efficient yellow phosphors compared with those reported yellow or
orange Ir(Ⅲ)-doped OLEDs [20,23,35].
With the aim of continuing effort, we reported herein three
robust Ir(III) complexes which were based on the rigid ligand 2-(4-
(9H-carbazol-9-yl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole (cbt) system with three
auxiliary ligand, namely (cbt)2Ir(acac) (acac ¼ acetylacetone),
(cbt)2Ir(tmd) (tmd ¼ 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione) and
(cbt)2Ir(pic) (pic ¼ picolinic acid), and possessed the dual functions
of light emission and hole transportation. The photophysical,
electrochemical and electroluminescent (EL) properties of the Ir(Ⅲ)
complexes were also investigated in detail. The OLEDs based on
these Ir(III) complexes as doped emitters exhibited attractive
electrophosphorescent performances.
2.2.2. Synthesis of (cbt)2Ir(acac)
Under N2 atmosphere, a mixture of ligand cbt (0.8 g, 2.14 mmol),
IrCl3$3H2O (0.352 g, 1 mmol), 2-ethoxyethanol and water (16 mL,
3:1, v/v) were heated to 110e120 ꢂC for 30 h. Then the reaction
mixture was cooled to RT and water was added. The brick red dimer
was obtained after vacuum filtration and drying.
A mixture of the above resulting dimer, acetylacetone (Hacac)
(2.2 mL, 2 mmol), potassium carbonate (0.69 g, 5 mmol) and 2-
ehoxyethanol (12 mL) was heated to 110e120 ꢂC for 24 h under
N2 atmosphere. After cooling the mixture to RT and the addition of
water, the resulting precipitate was collected by vacuum filtration
and drying. The orange-red product was obtained by column
chromatography on silica gel using petroleum and ethyl acetate as
eluents. Yield: 71%. MS (ESI): m/z 1043.2 [M þ Hþ]. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CD2Cl2, TMS):
d
8.34 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.018e8.016 (m,
4H), 8.002e7.913 (m, 2H), 7.88 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.69 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz,
2H), 7.57 (t, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.247e6.710 (m, 14H), 6.706 (s, 2H),
5.340 (s, 1H), 1.952 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, TMS):
186.31, 179.18, 150.58, 149.65, 140.56, 139.79, 138.36, 131.79, 131.69,
128.74, 127.63, 126.80, 125.64, 125.56, 123.44, 122.81, 119.90, 119.85,
119.84, 118.88, 110.23, 101.70, 29.67, 28.08, 18.86. Elemental analysis
for C55H37IrN4O2S2. Calcd: C, 63.38; H, 3.58; N, 5.38; Found: C 63.22,
H 3.65, N 5.33.
2. Experimental
2.2.3. Synthesis of (cbt)2Ir(tmd)
The complex (cbt)2Ir(tmd) was prepared according to the same
procedure as the complex (cbt)2Ir(acac). Orange powder. Yield:
87%. MS (ESI): m/z 1126.8 [M þ Hþ]. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2,
2.1. Reagents and physical measurements
Commercially available reagents and starting materials were
used for synthesis of the Ir(Ⅲ) complexes without further purifi-
cation. Solvents were purified and dried by standard procedures
prior to use. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AC 500
spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal refer-
ence. Mass spectroscopy (MS) was performed on AB SCIEX API 3200
spectrometer. The melting point (mp) was measured on WRS-2A
numeral melting point instrument. Elemental analysis was per-
formed on Vario EL III CHNS instrument. UVevis absorption and PL
spectra of the Ir(Ⅲ) complexes in CH2Cl2 solution of
1.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ5 mol Lꢀ1 were completed on a PerkinElmer Lambda 900
spectrophotometer and LS 55 fluorescence spectrophotometer,
respectively. The luminescent lifetimes of the Ir(Ⅲ) complexes in
CH2Cl2 were detected by a system equipped with a TDS 3052 digital
TMS):
d
8.25 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.023e8.006 (m, 4H), 7.918e7.873
(m, 4H), 7.591e5.561 (m, 2H), 7.52 (t, J ¼ 7.0 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, 4H),
7.215e6.839 (m, 10H), 6.836 (s, 2H), 5.557 (s, 1H), 0.953 (s, 18H); 13
C
NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, TMS): 195.67, 179.05, 151.12, 150.61, 140.81,
139.98, 138.07, 132.36, 131.29, 127.12, 126.49, 125.58, 125.34, 123.35,
122.43, 120.13, 119.83, 119.76, 118.62, 110.26, 91.52, 41.15, 27.71.
Elemental analysis for C61H49IrN4O2S2. Calcd: C, 65.04; H, 4.38; N,
4.97; Found: C 64.96, H 4.35, N 4.92.
2.2.4. Synthesis of (cbt)2Ir(pic)
The complex (cbt)2Ir(pic) was prepared according to the same
procedure as the complex (cbt)2Ir(acac). Orange powder. Yield:
53%. MS (ESI): m/z 1066.5 [M þ Hþ]. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2,
TMS):
d
8.75 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,1H), 8.22 (t, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.033e7.9934
phosphor oscilloscope pulsed Nd:YAG laser with
a
Third-
(m, 7H), 7.841e7.796 (m, 2H), 7.727 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.582 (d,
J ¼ 6.5 Hz, 1H), 7.516 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.392e6.892 (m, 16H), 6.625
(s, 1H), 6.622 (s, 1H), 6.348 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CD2Cl2, TMS): 180.55, 178.45, 172.49, 153.32, 150.95, 149.87, 149.83,
149.74, 148.72, 139.82, 139.79, 139.76, 139.58, 139.33, 139.25, 138.47,
131.99, 131.63, 131.19, 130.79, 128.39, 128.35, 127.88, 127.44, 127.41,
126.99,125.93,125.68, 125.30,123.60,123.47,123.44,122.71,120.76,
120.13, 119.99, 119.91, 119.82, 119.77, 119.13, 117.67, 110.20, 110.10.
Elemental analysis for C56H34IrN5O2S2. Calcd: C, 63.14; H, 3.22; N,
6.57; Found: C 63.06, H 3.15, N 6.52.
Harmonic-Generator (THG) 355 nm output. Cyclic voltammetry
experiments were conducted using a CHI 660D electrochemical
analyzer with a scan rate of 100 mV sꢀ1. All measurements were
carried out at room temperature (RT) unless otherwise specified.
2.2. Synthesis of the Ir(Ⅲ) complexes
2.2.1. Synthesis of cbt
A
mixture of 4-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)benzaldehyde (1.626 g,
6 mmol), 2-aminothiophenol (0.825 g, 6.6 mmol) and DMSO
(24 mL) was heated to 150e160 ꢂC in oil bath for 3.5 h. The mixture
was cooled to RT and poured into sodium chloride aqueous solution
and then the resulting precipitate was filtered. The light-yellow
crystal was obtained after recrystallization with ethyl acetate as
solvent. Yield: 65.6%. Mp: 223.3e223.6 ꢂC. MS (ESI): m/z 377.3
2.3. Device fabrication and EL measurements
OLEDs were fabricated through vacuum deposition of the ma-
terials at about 1 ꢁ 10ꢀ6 Torr onto ITO-coated glass substrates with
a sheet resistance of 25
U
sqꢀ1. The ITO-coated substrates were
[M þ Hþ]. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, TMS):
d
8.39 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H),
routinely cleaned by ultrasonic treatment in solvent and then
cleaned by exposure to a UV-ozone ambient. All organic layers were
8.20 (d, J ¼ 7.5 Hz, 2H), 8.14 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz,