conjugated enynes through the coupling of alkenyldialky-
lboranes and (trimethylsilyl)ethynyl bromide using strong
bases such as NaOMe and LiOH and a catalytic amount of
Table 1. Comparison of Well-Defined Copper(I) Complexes,
Copper(I) Salts, and Additives as Catalysts for the
Cross-Coupling of Phenylacetylene and
11
2
Cu(acac) .
(Z)-Ethyl-3-iodoacrylatea
In recent years, there has been a resurgence in the
development of copper-based protocols for a variety of cross-
1
2-14
coupling reactions.
These newly developed protocols
have been shown to be mild and tolerate a wide variety of
functional groups and substrates. On the basis of these
precedences, we now report a Cu(I)-catalyzed cross-coupling
reaction of vinyl iodides and acetylenes for the synthesis of
catalyst
w ell-d efin ed com p lexes
[Cu(phen)(PPh3)2]NO3
GC yield
1
,3-enynes.15
To optimize the reaction protocol we chose the cross-
76%
74%
69%
51%
34%
21%
7%
[
[
[
[
[
[
Cu(bipy)PPh3Br]
Cu(phen)PPh3Br]
Cu(PPh3)3Br]
Cu(neocup)PPh3Br]
Cu(acac)(PPh3)2]
Cu(neocup)2Br]H2O
coupling of phenylacetylene and (Z)-ethyl-3-iodoacrylate as
the test reaction. We examined a variety of copper(I)
complexes, copper(I) salts, and copper(I) salts with certain
additives in toluene at 110 °C with 2.0 equiv of Cs
the base (Table 1). It was found that both [Cu(phen)(PPh
NO and [Cu(bipy)PPh Br] were effective at catalyzing the
reaction.
2
CO
3
as
3 2
) ]-
3
3
[Cu(CH CN) ]PF
3
4
6
4%
cop p er (I) sa lts
Using these two complexes as potential catalysts, we then
screened a variety of bases for the cross-coupling of
phenylacetylene and (Z)-ethyl-3-iodoacrylate in toluene at
CuCl
CuI or CuBr or Cu O
2%
0%
2
cop p er (I) sa lts/a d d itives
1
(
10 °C for 24 h. It was found that the optimal base for [Cu-
phen)(PPh ]NO remained to be Cs CO . This afforded
the desired product with a yield of 76% by GC. However,
with [Cu(bipy)PPh Br] as the catalyst and K CO as the base,
CuI/phen/PPh3 (1:1:2)
CuI/phen (1:1)
CuI/bipy (1:1)
53%
36%
16%
3
)
2
3
2
3
3
2
3
a
Reaction Conditions: 1.00 mmol phenyl acetylene, 1.00 mmol (Z)-
ethyl-3-iodoacrylate, 10 mol % Cu(I) catalyst, 2.0 equiv Cs2CO3, toluene,
10 °C, 24 h (phen ) 1,10-phenanthroline, bipy ) 2,2′-bipyridine, neocup
2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, acac ) acetylacetonate).
the yield was improved to 99%. Lowering the amount of
base to 1.5 equiv resulted in lower yields. Other bases such
as K PO , Na CO , KOtBu, NaOtBu, Et N, and DBU were
3 4 2 3 3
1
)
ineffective with this reaction. When this reaction was
monitored over a period of time, it was discovered that the
reaction was complete within 8 h. Lowering the catalytic
using 2.0 equiv of K
2 3
CO as the base decreased the yield to
51% in 24 h. When the reaction was run either in the absence
of catalyst or in the absence of base, the product was not
observed by GC. On the basis of the results of the
optimization and control experiments, we decided to use 10
loading of [Cu(bipy)PPh
3
Br] to 2.5 mol % for the cross-
coupling of phenylacetylene and (Z)-ethyl-3-iodoacrylate
(
11) Hoshi, M.; Shirakawa, K. Synlett 2002, 1101.
mol % [Cu(bipy)PPh
3
Br] as the catalyst and 2.0 equiv of
(12) (a) Van Allen, D.; Venkataraman, D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4590.
K
2
CO as the base in toluene at 110 °C for the standard
3
(
b) Gujadhur, R. K.; Venkataraman, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 81. (c)
Bates, C. G.; Gujadhur, R. K.; Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2803.
d) Bates, C. G.; Saejueng, P.; Murphy, J. M.; Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett.
002, 4, 4727. (e) Gujadhur, R. K.; Bates, C. G.; Venkataraman, D. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 4315. (f) Gujadhur, R.; Venkataraman, D.; Kintigh, J. T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4791. (g) Gujadhur, R.; Venkataraman, D. Synth.
Comm. 2001, 31, 2865.
protocol for synthesizing 1,3-enynes.
(
2
We first chose to examine the efficacy of coupling a
variety of acetylenes to (Z)-ethyl-3-iodoacrylate (Table 2).
It was found that a wide-range of aryl acetylenes could be
coupled in good to excellent yields with complete retention
of stereochemistry. This method tolerated both electron-rich
and electron-poor aryl acetylenes. Sterically hindered aryl
acetylenes (Table 2, entries 3 and 13) are also successfully
coupled in good to excellent yields. Notably, base-sensitive
functional groups such as methyl ketones (Table 2, entry
11) and methyl esters (Table 2, entries 12 and 13) are also
tolerated by this method. A free aniline group (Table 2, entry
(13) (a) Jiang, L.; Job, G. E.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett.
2
5
003, 5, 3667. (b) Gelman, D.; Jiang, L.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003,
, 2315. (c) Kwong, F. Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 793. (d)
Kwong, F. Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3517. (e) Wolter, M.;
Nordmann, G.; Job, G. E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 973. (f)
Kwong, F. Y.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 581. (g)
Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang, X. H.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 7727. (h) Marcoux, J. F.; Doye, S.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10539.
(14) (a) Kunz, K.; Scholz, U.; Ganzer, D. Synlett 2003, 2428. (b) Ley,
S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400. (c) Ma, D.
W.; Cai, Q.; Zhang, H. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2453. (d) Fagan, P. J.; Hauptman,
E.; Shapiro, R.; Casalnuovo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5043. (e)
Kalinin, A. V.; Bower, J. F.; Riebel, P.; Snieckus, V. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
6), a terminal alkene (Table 2, entry 7), and a bromine (Table
2, entry 17) all proved to be compatible functional groups.
Heterocyclic acetylenes such as a pyridine moiety and a
thiophene (Table 2, entries 15 and 16, respectively) were
also compatible substrates with this protocol. However, for
6
(
2
4, 2986. (f) Goodbrand, H. B.; Hu, N. X. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 670.
g) Zhang, S. J.; Zhang, D. W.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62,
312.
15) We are aware of only one account of a copper(I)-catalyzed cross-
(
3
-ethynylpyridine, the use of [Cu(phen)(PPh
3 2 3
) ]NO as the
coupling of vinyl iodides and acetylenes. However, this method requires
the use of DMF or DMSO as the solvent at 120 °C. Furthermore, the scope
and limitations of this reaction have not been fully explored. See: Okuro,
K.; Furuune, M.; Enna, M.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Org. Chem. 1993,
catalyst and Cs CO as the base was needed to obtain the
2
3
cross-coupled product in a moderate yield. The cross-
5
8, 4716.
coupling of n-octyne and (Z)-ethyl-3-iodoacrylate demon-
1442
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 9, 2004