I. Ahmad et al. · Enzymes Inhibitory Constituents from Buddleja crispa
345
covered from the organic phase crystallized from H O, m. p.
Compound 3. – Oil. – IR (KBr) ν = 3470, 1700, 1670,
2
◦
−1
1
23 C: It was characterized as benzoic acid (m.m.p., IR and 1610, 1530, 1460, 1365, 1280, 1160, 720 cm . – UV
Co-TLC).
(MeOH) λmax = 235, 325. – HREIMS m/z 248, 164, 147,
1
Corresponding hydrolysis of 3 provided hexanol (char- 119. – H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 0.87 (3H, t,
acterized through B. P, IR and co-TLC) and p-hydroxy cin- J = 6.34 Hz, Me), 1.29 [6H, br m, (CH2)3], 1.65 (2H,
namic acid, colourless crystals from H O, m. p. 212 C (char- m, OCH2CH2R), 4.19 (2H, t, J = 6.69 Hz, OCH2CH2R),
◦
2
acterized through m.m.p., Co-TLC, IR).
6.29 (1H,d, J = 16.0 Hz, =CH), 6.87 (2H,d, J = 8.4 Hz
Compound 1: – Colourless crystalline. – M. p. 258 – H-3 and H-5), 7.39 (2H,d, J = 8.4 Hz H-2 and H-6),
◦
13
2
(
1
60 C. – [α]D −29.9 (c = 0.02, MeOH). – UV λmax 7.64 (1H,d, J = 16 Hz CH=). – C NMR (100 MHz,
MeOH) 235, 240, 250. – IR (KBr) ν = 3490 (OH group), CDCl3) δ = 168.7 (C-3’), 158.7 (C-4), 145.2 (C-1’),
−1
650, 890 cm
(double bonds). – Positive HRFABMS 130.0 (C-2 and C-6), 126.6 (C-1), 116.1 (C-3 and C-5),
+
m/z 591.4243 [M+H] (calcd. 591.4245 for C H O ). – 114.8 (C-2’), 65.1 (C-1”), 31.4 (C-2”), 28.6 (C-3”),
35
59
7
HREIMS m/z 572, 428, 410, 271. – 1H NMR (90 MHz, 25.6 (C-4”), 22.5 (C-5”), 14.0 (C-6”).
CD OD) δ = 0.81 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, H-26), 0.87 (s,
3
In vitro cholinesterase inhibition assay
3
6
H, H-18), 0.89 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, H-29), 0.91 (d, J =
.9, 3H, H-27), 0.93 (d, J = 7.0, 3H, H-21), 1.02 (s, 3H,
Electric-eel AChE (EC 3.1.1.7), horse-serum BChE (EC
H-19), 1.39 (m, 1H, H-4β), 1.59 (m, 1H, H-2β), 1.88 (m, 3.1.1.8), acetylthiocholine iodide, butyrylthiocholine chlo-
H, H-4α), 1.96 (m, 1H, H-2α), 3.28 (m, 1H, H-22), 3.66 ride, 5,5’-dithiobis [2-nitrobenzoic acid] (DTNB) and galan-
m, 1H, H-3), 5.56 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H, H-11), 5.85 (d, thamine were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, H-7), 4.65 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-1’), 3.27 – All other chemicals were of analytical grade. AChE and
.45 (m, H-2’,3’,5’), 3.31 (t, J = 1.6 Hz, H-4’), 3.63 dd BChE inhibiting activities were measured by the spectropho-
J = 11.9, 5.5 Hz) and 3.84 dd (J = 11.9, 2.3) (H-6’). – tometric method developed by Ellman et al. [31]. Assay
1
(
3
(
1
3
C NMR (100 MHz, CD OD) δ = 37.7 (C-1), 30.5 (C-2), conditions and protocol was the same as described previ-
3
7
1
4
2
4
4
2
7
9.3 (C-3), 35.5 (C-4), 40.6 (C-5), 31.0 (C-6), 123.1 (C-7), ously [32].
33.2 (C-8), 145.7 (C-9), 37.0 (C-10), 119.4 (C-11),
In vitro lipoxygenase inhibition assay
4.9 (C-12), 42.6 (C-13), 57.9 (C-14), 25.8 (C-15),
7.9 (C-16), 52.7 (C-17), 13.6 (C-18), 19.6 (C-19),
Lipoxygenase inhibiting activity was measured by slightly
2.8 (C-20), 12.6 (C-21), 72.5 (C-22), 30.0 (C-23), modifying the spectrometric method developed by A. L. Tap-
1.5 (C-24), 28.9 (C-25), 17.5 (C-26), 20.6 (C-27), pel [33]. Lipoxygenase (1.13.11.12) type I-B and linoleic
3.6 (C-28), 11.9 (C-29), 100.6 (C-1’), 73.2 (C-2’), acid were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All
6.6 (C-3’), 70.2 (C-4’), 76.7 (C-5’), 61.2 (C-6’).
other chemicals were of analytical grade. The assay condi-
Compound 2. – Oil. – IR (KBr) ν = 1720, 1610, 1460. tions and protocol was the same as described previously [34].
UV (MeOH) λmax = 227, 282. – HREIMS m/z 248, 122,
–
1
1
Determination of IC50 values
05, 77. – H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ = 0.82 (3H,
3
t, J = 7.0 Hz, Me), 1.22 [12H, br m, (CH ) ], 1.50 (2H,
The concentrations of the test compounds that inhibited
2
6
m, OCH CH R), 4.26 (2H, m, OCH CH R), 7.47 (IH, m), the hydrolysis of substrates (acetylthiocholine, butyrylthio-
2
2
2
2
13
7
.97 2H, m), 7.36 (2H,m). – C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) choline and linoleic acid) by 50% (IC50) were determined
δ = 166.7 (C-1’), 132.7 (C-4), 130.5 (C-1), 129.5 (C-2, by monitoring the effect of various concentrations of these
6
2
2
), 128.3 (C-3,5), 65.1 (C-1”), 32.62 (C-2”), 31.8 (C-7”), compounds in the assays on the inhibition values. The IC50
5.7 (C-4”), 29.6 (C-5”), 29.4 (C-6”), 26.8 (C-3”), values were then calculated using the EZ-Fit Enzyme Kinet-
2.6 (C-8”), 14.2 (C-9”).
ics program (Perrella Scientific Inc., Amherst, USA).
[
1] P. Abdullah, Flora of West Pakistan, Vol. 56, p. 1,
[6] N. Ding, S. Yahara, T. Nohara, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 40,
780 (1992).
(1974).
[
[
2] P. J. Houghton, J. Ethnopharmacol. 11, 293 (1985).
3] V. K. Kapoor, A. S. Chawla, Y. C. Gupta, S. Passan-
nanti, M. P. Paternostro, Fitoterapia. 52, 235 (1981).
4] S. C. Garg and V. B. Oswal, Rev. Ital, E.P.P.O.S. 62,
[7] F. Pardo, F. Perich, L. Villarroel, R. Torres, J.
Ethnopharmacol. 39, 221 (1993).
[8] J. Li, Y. Zhao, L. Ma, J. Chin. Pharm. Soc. 6, 178
(1997).
[9] H. Matsuda, H. Cai, M. Kubo, H. Tosa, M. Iinuma, Bio.
Pharm. Bull. 18, 463 (1995).
[
[
3
65 (1981)
5] J. Lopez, J. Sierra, M. E. Vegazo, M. Cortes, Fitoter-
apia. 50, 195 (1979).
[10] P. J. Houghton, Phytochemistry 28, 2693 (1989).
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 10/29/17 4:46 AM