Job/Unit: Z13321
/KAP1
Date: 05-09-13 13:41:56
Pages: 8
C. L. Teske
ARTICLE
Δm(theo) = 51.16% for the release of NH , CS , H O and H S lines of Cu S[ and Cu1.81S,[29] which partly coincide are def-
28]
3
2
2
2
2
(
ratio: 2:1:1:0.5). Technically this corresponds to the decay of initely observable.
one mol NH S CNH and the total loss of all water of
4
2
2
crystallization. However, the additional emergence of H S is
an evidence for at least partial formation of CuSCN. The
2
Conclusions
I
XRPD of an intermediate taken from the temperature range T
It was shown that the preparation of Cu -dithiocarbamates
[26]
≈
180 to 200 °C shows the lines of β-CuSCN.
The next applying cyanide as reductive is a convenient method. The new
distinct mass loss occurs at T ≈ 425 °C (Δm = 15.6%). An compounds NH
[Cu(S CNH ) ]·H O (A) and CuS CNH (B)
4
2 2 2 2 2 2
emission of HCN and S (ratio: 2:1) corresponds to a theoretical were obtained. (A) is the first example comprising of the anion
–
–
loss of Δm(theo) = 15.5%. Both steps add up to Δm = 66.8%. [Cu(S
CNH ) ] which is known as [Cu(S CNR ) ] (R = or-
2 2 2 2 2
2
The calculated Δm = 66.4% applies to the formation of CuS. ganic moiety) from electrochemical investigations of transition
[30]
(
This applies also for a decomposition via NH ,CS , H O and metal dithiocarbamates.
Obviously, this anion has never
In both crystal structures of (A) and
3
2
2
–
[31]
H CNS ; ratio: 2:1:1:1). The trends of the TG curves of both been isolated before.
2
dithiocarbamates in the temperature region above T Ͼ 400 °C (B) copper has a tetrahedral surrounding of its next sulfur
are very similar (Figure 6 and Figure 7). That is why this re- neighbors (from monodentate dithiocarbamate ligands) which
I
gion was not further investigated assuming that the final for- is a characteristic feature for Cu . Both new compounds de-
mation of Cu S (vide infra) would most likely proceed simi- compose at elevated temperatures in the course of complex
2
larly in both cases.
endothermic processes finally giving Cu S.
2
Acknowledgments
CuS CNH
2
2
The thermal decomposition of CuS CNH is also a complex The author is grateful to the institutions Bundesministerium für
2
2
endothermic process. It starts at T ≈ 170 °C and is completed Bildung und Forschung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Baye-
risches Staatministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst for
covering the costs of the Electronic Journals Library and electronic
databases at CAU Kiel. Special thanks go to Prof. Christian Näther
and Inke Jess for their support and the measurements (TG-DTA-MS,
single crystal data) as well as to all colleagues who measured the
XRPDs.
at T ≈ 800 °C (Figure 7). The overall experimental mass loss
is Δm = 48.7% which corresponds perfectly to a calculated
loss of Δm = 48.9% for the formation of Cu S. During the
2
first the large step, at least two strongly overlapping decompo-
sitions occur. At best, one can assume that at T ≈ 434 °C (onset
of an endothermic effect Figure 7) a first partial decomposition
might be completed before the start of the next reaction. The
associated experimental loss Δm = 43.8% corresponds to a References
technically calculated mass loss of Δm = 43.7%, of HCN, H2S
[
1] B. H. O’Conner, E. N. Malsen, Acta Crystallogr. 1966, 21, 828–
30.
and S (ratio: 2:1:1.5). The same theoretical Δm corresponds to
8
–
a loss of two thiooxime anions (H CNS m/z = 60, vide supra) [2] F. Jian, Z. Wang, Z. Bai, X. You, H. K. Fun, K. Chinnakali, I. A.
2
Razak, Polyhedron 1999, 18, 3401–3406.
3] A. M. Manotti Lanfredi, F. Ugozzoli, A. Camus, J. Chem. Crys-
tallogr. 1996, 26, 141–145.
and 1/2 S. The XRPD from an intermediate at T ≈ 400 °C
[
comprises
(
basically
and Cu9S
5
the
reflections
of
covellite
CuS)[
23]
[27]
(Figure 8). The XRPD from the end
[4] P. D. W. Boyd, S. Mitra, C. L. Raston, G. L. Rowbottom, A. H.
product is very rich in lines. Nevertheless, the characteristic
White, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1981, 1, 13–22.
[
[
5] M. J. Weeks, J. P. Fackler, Inorg. Chem. 1968, 7, 2548–2553.
6] G. Hogarth, A. Pateman, S. P. Remond, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000,
3
06, 232–236.
7] M. R. Caira, K. R. Koch, C. Sacht, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C
991, 47, 26–29.
8] D. Cardell, G. Hogarth, S. Faulkner, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006,
59,1321–1324.
9] L. I. Victoriano, H. B. Cortés, J. Coord. Chem. 1996, 39, 231–
39.
[
[
[
[
1
3
2
10] L. M. Nguyen, M. E. Dellinger, J. T. Lee, R. A. Quinlan, A. L.
Rheingold, R. D. Pik, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 1331–1336.
11] M. R. Udupa, G. Aravamudan, Curr. Sci. 1972, 41, 525.
12] T. Yoshio, A. Hiroshi, Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho 2003,
JP2003128646, 4.
[
[
[
13] A. Kumar, H. Mayer-Figge, W. S. Sheldrick, N. Singh, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2720–2725.
[
14] Z. Wei, Z. Xiu-Lin, C. Zhen-Ping, Z. Jian, L. Jian-Ping, L. Jian-
Mai, Chin. J. Chem. 2004, 22, 888–890.
[
[
15] R. Mattes, K. Schulbert, Z. Naturforsch. 1991, 46b, 468–744.
16] C. L. Teske, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2010, 636, 356–
362.
Figure 8. X-ray powder diagram of an intermediate taken at T ≈
4
00 °C from the decomposition of CuS
2
CNH
2
(arrows indicate the [17] X-RED, Data Reduction Program, Version 1.11, Stoe & Cie
9 5
S ). GmbH, 1998.
lines of covellite, circles indicate the lines of Cu
6
www.zaac.wiley-vch.de
© 0000 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 0000, 0–0