Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 3 of 4
DOI: 10.1039/C8CC03456G
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
Scheme 3. Synthesis of (+)-ovafolinin A
global debenzylation and
a
Cu(OAc)2-enabled benzylic
oxidative cyclization. As the result, the synthesis (+)-ovafolinin
B has been completed in 11 linear steps and 23% total yield.
And the synthesis of (+)-ovafolinin A has been achieved in 12
linear steps and 21% total yield.
OMe
OH
OMe
O
H
O
H
OH
OMe
OMe
OMe
OMe
conditions
H
We are grateful for financial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (21772153, 21642006 and
21372184), the Key Science and Technology Innovation Team
of Shaanxi Province (2017KCT-37) and the China Postdoctoral
Science Foundation (334100041).
H
H
H
OH
OH
O
HO
OMe
OMe
(+)ꢀovafolinin B (2)
(+)ꢀovafolinin A (1)
conditions
yields of 1
OMe
PhI(OAc)2, DCM, r.t.
28%
Conflicts of interest
O
H
OH
Ag2O, DCM, r.t.
DDQ, 1,4ꢀdioxane, r.t.
Cu(OAc)2, MeCN, 65
TBAF, air, THF, r.t.
air, neat, r.t.
55%
76%
91%
52%
< 5%
OMe
OMe
There are no conflicts to declare.
H
O
HO
OMe
Notes and references
17
1
(a) J. Chang, J. Reiner, J. Xie, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4581-
4609. (b) R. B. Teponno, S. Kusari, M. Spiteller, Nat. Prod.
Rep. 2016, 33, 1044-1092.
decomposition products.9 In our case, protections of three
hydroxy groups in 16 are all benzyl groups. To our delight,
treatment of 16 with trifluoroacetic acid established
successfully the expected polycyclic skeleton through basically
2
3
4
T. F. Imbert, Biochimie 1998, 80, 207-222.
J. L. Charlton, J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 1447-1451.
M. Fauré, E. Lissi, R. Torres, L. A. Videla, Phytochemistry
1990, 29, 3773-3775.
P. C. Li, D. H. F. Mark, M. K. T. Poon, S. P. Ip, K. M. Ko,
Phytomedicine 1996, 3, 217-221.
a double Friedel-Crafts reaction process, affording
yield. The subsequent hydrogenation removed all three benzyl
protections and gave (+)-ovafolinin B ( ) in quantitative yield.
Noteworthy, the final de-protection process in Barker’s
synthesis led to formation of not only but also , both in
poor yields. In our synthesis, there was no formation of
observed during the debenzylation process of
3 in 87%
5
6
7
2
K. Kashima, K. Sano, Y. S. Yun, H. Ina, A. Kunugi, H. Inoue,
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2010, 58, 191-194.
2
1
L. Xiong, C. Zhu, Y. Li, Y. Tian, S. Lin, S. Yuan, J. Hu, Q. Hou, N.
Chen, Y. Yang, J. Shi, J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1188-1200.
H. H. Jia, X. D. Wu, Zhong Yao Cai. 1992, 15, 35-36.
S. J. Davidson, D. Barker, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56,
9483-9486.
1
2.
8
9
With the successful development of an asymmetric route to
, we focused on the synthesis of . We envisaged that the
benzylic oxidation cyclization of could lead to the formation
of p-benzoquinone methide intermediate 17 And the
following conjugated addition from the vicinal hydroxy group
will furnish in the end. Therefore, was submitted to various
2
1
10 (a) C. E. Rye, D. Barker, J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6636-6648.
(b) S. J. Davidson, D. Barker, Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56,
4549-4553. (c) C. E. Rye, D. Barker, Synlett 2009, 3315-3319.
11 T. Suzuki, M. Takamoto, T. Okamoto, H. Takayama, Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1986, 34, 1888-1900.
12 (a) F. Ishibashi, E. Taniguchi, Chem. Lett. 1986, 15, 1771-
1774. (b) F. Ishibashi, E. Taniguchi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1988, 61, 4361-4366. (c) F. Ishibashi, E. Taniguchi,
2
.
1
2
conditions reported for formation of benzoquinone methide
intermediates. The employment of PhI(OAc)2 resulted in the
17
generation of
and DDQ19 could significantly improve the formation of
respectively. The best result was obtained from the treatment
with Cu(OAc)2,20 affording
in 91% yield. Barker’s condition
was also checked, which lead to the formation of in
moderate yield after the complete consumption of . Due to
our curiosity, the aerial oxidation of was checked under neat
can be formed after three
1
but in poor yield. The oxidation with Ag2O18
1,
Phytochemistry 1998, 49, 613-622. (d) G. Stork, D. Niu, A.
Fujimoto, E. R. Koft, J. M. Balkovec, J. R. Tata, G. R. J. Dake, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3239-3242. (e) H. Miyaoka, Y.
Hara, I. Shinohara, T. Kurokawa, Y. Yamada, Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 7945-7949. (f) D. Stadler, T. Bach, Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7557-7559. (g) K. Ota, N. Sugata, Y.
Ohshiro, E. Kawashima, H. Miyaoka, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18,
13531-13537.
1
1
2
2
condition. Only trace amount of
days.
1
13 F. Kieseritzky, Y. Wang, M. Axelson, Org. Process Res. Dev.
2014, 18, 643-645.
14 (a) J. Rath, S. Kinast, M. E. Maier, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3089-
3092. (b) J. Quancard, A. Labonne, Y. Jacquot, G. Chassaing, S.
Lavielle, P. Karoyan, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7940-7948.
After the synthesis of
rotation properties of our synthetic (+)-ovafolinins A and B
were checked. The data (+159.5, (c = 0.36, MeOH) for and
+166.0 (c = 0.16, MeOH) for ) are close to those observed by
1 and 2 completed, the optical
1
2
Baker and coworkers, which supports Barker’s conclusion that
natural ovafolinins A and B were both isolated in scalemic
mixtures.
15 Compound
5
was prepared in three steps from
syringaldehyde. Please see the Supporting Information file
for experimental details.
16 For attempts on the originally proposed double Friedel-
Crafts reaction between
Supporting Information for detail.
17 B. Fang, X. Xie, C. Zhao, P. Jing, H. Li, Z. Wang, J. Gu, X. She, J.
Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 6338-6343.
18 (a) F. D. Ramdayal, D. J. Kiemle, R. T. LaLonde, J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 4607-4609. (b) K. C. Rice, W. C. Ripka, J. Reden, A.
Brossi, J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 601-607.
5 and 14, please see the
Conclusions
In summary, an asymmetric synthetic approach to (+)-
ovafolinins A and B has been developed. The entire synthetic
route features with a high stereoselective alkylation of (S)-
Taniguchi lactone, a double Friedel-Crafts reaction process, a
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins