1332
N. A. Colabufo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21 (2013) 1324–1332
active towards P-gp and more active towards the other MDR
pumps, BCRP and MRP1.
References and notes
1. Gottesman, M. M.; Fojo, T.; Bates, S. E. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 48.
2. Leslie, E. M.; Deeley, R. G.; Cole, S. P. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 204, 216.
3. Tan, B.; Piwnica-Worms, D.; Ratner, L. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2000, 12, 450.
4. Szakács, G.; Paterson, J. K.; Ludwig, J. A.; Booth-Genthe, C.; Gottesman, M. M.
Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2006, 5, 219.
5. Borst, P.; Evers, R.; Kool, M.; Wijnholds, J. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000, 92, 1295.
6. Avendano, C.; Menendez, J. C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 159.
7. Pérez-Tomás, R. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1859.
Since this aryl fragment and the presence and position of substi-
tuent addressed the activity towards P-gp or BCRP or MRP1, in the
present work the effect of the hindrance on the activity towards P-
gp/BCRP/and MRP1 replacing the aryl group with substituted
naphthalenyl fragments was evaluated. The employed heteronu-
clei: (i) oxazole; (ii) thiazole; (iii) furyl, could play an important
role in terms of selectivity.
8. Modok, S.; Mellor, H. R.; Callaghan, R. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 350.
9. Teodori, E.; Dei, S.; Martelli, S.; Scapecchi, F.; Gualtieri, F. Curr. Drug Targets
2006, 7, 893.
Aryloxazole and arythiazole derivatives, previously developed,
displayed with respect to MC18 and MC70, a decreased P-gp activity
and selectivity.22 In addition, both aryl-oxazoles and -thiazoles were
P-gp substrates whereas MC18 and MC70 showed inhibitory activ-
ity. As listed in Table 1, compounds 11a,b and 11e displayed P-gp
inhibitory activity although less potent than MC18 and MC70. More-
over, 11d, 12c,d were found unambiguous substrates while all the
other compounds could be considered as ambiguous substrates.15
In terms of potency towards P-gp, the best results have been ob-
tained with methoxy-naphathalenyl substituted derivatives 11d
and 12d bearing oxazole and thiazole nuclei, respectively. Among
them, only 12d was inactive towards MRP1 and BCRP (Fig. 5) while
11d was inactive toward BCRP and displayed moderate MRP1
activity. These results lead to consider the thiazole nucleus as
pivotal to hit P-gp activity while oxazole nucleus compromised
the P-gp selectivity because 11d was active also towards MRP1.
Moreover, also 6-Br-substituted derivative 12c was inactive to-
wards BCRP and therefore the substituent unaffected BCRP activity.
Finally, furyl derivatives 5a,b displayed moderate P-gp activity and
good selectivity but they were ambiguous substrates.
In conclusion, the replacement of aryl with naphthalenyl
moiety led to obtain P-gp inhibitors, unambiguous or ambiguous
substrates. These different activities were modulated both by het-
eronucleus and substituent on the naphthalenyl fragment. Indeed,
oxazole derivatives were inhibitors when R = H, F, OH, unambigu-
ous substrates when R = OCH3, ambiguous substrate when
R = Br. Thiazole derivatives were unambiguous substrates when
R = OCH3, Br, while when R = H, F were ambiguous substrates.
Finally furyl derivatives were ambiguous substrates. These conclu-
sions in terms of intrinsic activity should be corroborated by other
characterizations such as the contribution of passive diffusion to
perform acceptable predictions of in vivo biodistribution.31
10. Thomas, H.; Coley, H. M. Cancer Control 2003, 10, 159.
11. Nobili, S.; Landini, I.; Giglioni, B.; Mini, E. Curr. Drug Targets 2006, 7, 861.
12. Palmeira, A.; Sousa, E.; Vasconcelos, M. H.; Pinto, M.; Fernandes, M. X. Curr.
Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 4197.
13. Kannan, P.; Telu, S.; Shukla, S.; Ambudkar, S. V.; Pike, V. W.; Halldin, C.;
Gottesman, M. M.; Innis, R. B.; Hall, M. D. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 82.
14. Dörner, B.; Kuntner, C.; Bankstahl, J. P.; Stanek, J.; Wanek, T.; Stundner, G.;
Mairinger, S.; Löscher, W.; Müller, M.; Langer, O.; Erker, T. J. Med. Chem. 2009,
52, 6073.
15. Wanek, T.; Kuntner, C.; Bankstahl, J. P.; Bankstahl, M.; Stanek, J.; Sauberer, M.;
Mairinger, S.; Strommer, S.; Wacheck, V.; Löscher, W.; Erker, T.; Müller, M.;
Langer, O. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, 149.
16. Doyle, L. A.; Ross, D. D. Oncogene 2003, 22, 7340.
17. Bauer, F.; Kuntner, C.; Bankstahl, J. P.; Wanek, T.; Bankstahl, M.; Stanek, J.;
Mairinger, S.; Dörner, B.; Löscher, W.; Müller, M.; Erker, T.; Langer, O. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 5489.
18. Colabufo, N. A.; Berardi, F.; Cantore, M.; Perrone, M. G.; Contino, M.; Inglese, C.;
Niso, M.; Perrone, R.; Azzariti, A.; Porcelli, L.; Simone, G. M.; Paradiso, A. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 362.
19. Colabufo, N. A.; van Waarde, A. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 1701.
20. Van Waarde, A.; Ramakrishnan, N. K.; Rybczynska, A. A.; Elsinga, P. H.; Berardi,
F.; de Jong, J. R.; Kwizera, C.; Perrone, R.; Cantore, M.; Sijbesma, J. W.; Dierckx,
R. A.; Colabufo, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 4524.
21. Leung, K. 6,7-Dimethoxy-2-{3-[4-[11C]methoxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-naphthalen-
(1E)-ylidene]-propyl}-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-isoquinoline, Molecular Imaging and
Contrast Agent Database (MICAD), 2010.
22. Leung,
K.
6,7-Dimethoxy-2-[3-(5-[11C]methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-
naphthalen-1-yl)-propyl]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-isoquinoline, Molecular Imaging
and Contrast Agent Database (MICAD), 2010.
23. Inglese, C.; Perrone, M. G.; Berardi, F.; Perrone, R.; Colabufo, N. A. Curr. Drug
Metab. 2011, 12, 702.
24. Colabufo, N. A.; Berardi, F.; Cantore, M.; Perrone, M. G.; Contino, M.; Inglese, C.;
Niso, M.; Perrone, R.; Azzariti, A.; Simone, G. M.; Paradiso, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2008, 16, 3732.
25. Colabufo, N. A.; Berardi, F.; Cantore, M.; Perrone, M. G.; Contino, M.; Inglese, C.;
Niso, M.; Perrone, R. ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 188.
26. Feng, B. J.; Mills, B.; Davidson, R. E.; Mireles, R. J.; Janiszewski, J. S.; Troutman,
M. D.; de Morais, S. M. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 268.
27. Kangas, L.; Grönroos, M.; Nieminem, A. L. Med. Biol. 1984, 62, 338.
28. Rautio, J.; Humphreys, J. E.; Webster, L. O.; Balakrishnan, A.; Keogh, J. P.; Kunta,
J. R.; Serabjit-Singh, J.; Polli, J. W. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006, 34, 786.
29. Eidelman, O.; Cabantchik, Z. I. Methods Enzymol. 1989, 172, 122.
30. Altenberg, G. A.; Vanoye, C. G.; Han, E. S.; Deitmer, J. W.; Reuss, L. J. Biol. Chem.
1994, 269, 7145.
Supplementary data
31. Garberg, P.; Ball, M.; Borg, N.; Cecchelli, R.; Fenart, L.; Hurst, R. D.; Lindmark, T.;
Mabondzo, A.; Nilsson, J. E.; Raub, T. J.; Stanimirovic, D.; Terasaki, T.; Oberg, J.
O.; Osterberg, T. Toxicol. In Vitro 2005, 19, 299.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in