Convenient preparations of racemic and enantiopure methyl 6-oxopipecolate

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/00397919608086742

Short, convenient syntheses of racemic and enantiopure methyl 6-oxopipecolate are described, starting from either pipecolic acid or (S)-lysine respectively. The sequence for the latter compound relies upon improved methodology for the oxidation of C-6 of

Full text of DOI:10.1080/00397919608086742

This article was downloaded by: [Tulane University]
On: 31 August 2014, At: 05:08
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK
Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid
Communication of Synthetic
Organic Chemistry
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
Convenient preparations of
racemic and enantiopure
methyl 6-oxopipecolate
Catherine E. Davies a , Thomas D. Heightman a
Stephen A. Hermitage a & Mark G. Moloney a
,
a The Dyson Perrins Laboratory , University of
Oxford , South Parks Rd, Oxford, OX1 3QY
Published online: 21 Nov 2007.
To cite this article: Catherine E. Davies , Thomas D. Heightman , Stephen A.
Hermitage & Mark G. Moloney (1996) Convenient preparations of racemic and
enantiopure methyl 6-oxopipecolate, Synthetic Communications: An International
Journal for Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 26:4, 687-696, DOI:
10.1080/00397919608086742
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919608086742
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with

primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions