1068
H. ESHGHI ET AL.
δH (ppm): 3.50 (s, 3H), 5.40 (s, 1H), 6.75 (s, 2H, NH2),
7.0–7.50 (m, 10H).
CN
OH
Ar
NH2
(Entry 4): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3430, 3116, 3045, 2965,
2194, 1709, 1551, 1460, 1375, 1273, 1097, 830, 750. δH
(ppm): 5.30 (s, 1H), 6.80–7.05 (m, 3H), 7.10–7.75 (m,
9H).
O
Fe(HSO4)3
OH
NH2
(Entry 5): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3445, 3180, 2196, 1654, 1585,
1555, 1536, 1500, 1386, 1258, 1159, 1013, 805, 770. δH
(ppm): 5.25 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.60–7.80 (m,
3H), 7.90–8.15 (m, 5H).
CN
Ar
O
CN
CN
ArCHO +
+
(Entry 6): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3456, 3166, 3091, 2171,
1585, 1572, 1548, 1493, 1372, 1233, 1145, 987, 875.
δH (ppm): 5.15 (s, 1H), 6.65 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.0–7.70 (m,
8H), 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 8 Hz).
Fe(HSO4)3
OH
HO
O
NH2
CN
(Entry 7): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3444, 3305, 3192, 2738, 2194,
1617, 1537, 1317, 1258, 1086, 808; δH (ppm): 3.65 (s,
3H), 5.60 (s, 1H), 7.35 (m, 6H), 7.4–7.8 (m, 6H).
(Entry 9): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3437, 3057, 3006, 2930, 2195,
1570, 1482, 1375, 1216, 1087, 866. δH (ppm): δH 4.85
(s, 1H), 6.40–7.40 (m, 10H), 9.9 (s, 1H, OH).
(Entry 10): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3400, 3108, 2970, 2196,
1713, 1460, 1094, 1020, 736. δH (ppm): δH 4.80 (s, 1H),
6.90–7.10 (m, 2H, NH2), 7.30–7.50 (m, 4H), 7.55–7.95
(m, 3H), 9.75 (bs, 1H, OH).
OH
Ar
Fe(HSO4)3
SCH. 1. Ferric hydrogen sulfate-catalyzed three-component synthesis of 2-
amino-4H-chromenes.
General Procedure for Synthesis of 2-Amino-3-cyano-4-
substituted-4H-benzo[e]chromene Derivatives (1–8) and
2-Amino-3-cyano-7-hydroxy-4-substituted-4H-chromene
(9–12)
(Entry 11): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3445, 3133, 2195, 1736,
1660, 1452, 1301, 1117, 958, 752. δH (ppm): δH 4.75 (s,
1H), 7–7.30 (m, 7H), 7.40–7.55 (m, 2H), 9.70 (s, 1H,
OH).
A reaction mixture of 2-naphthol (144 mg, 1.0 mmol),
benzaldehyde (106 mg, 1.0 mmol), malononitrile (61 µL,
1.1 mmol), and Fe(HSO4)3 (0.034 mg, 0.1 mmol) in MeCN
(10 mL) was refluxed for 4.5 h. Thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) showed completion of the reaction. The reaction mix-
ture was filtered to recover the catalyst. The catalyst was further
washed with an additional portion of MeCN (2 × 5 mL). The
combined filtrates were concentrated in vacuo to give Entry 1 as
an amorphous, off-white-colored solid (271 mg). NMR evalua-
tion of this solid shows the obianed compound is almost pure.
Crystallization of this solid from hot EtOH gives pure prod-
uct (256 mg, 86% yield) as colorless needles (melting point
[mp] 278◦C). The recovered Fe(HSO4)3 catalyst could be reused
without further treatment.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Using β-naphthol, malononitrile, and benzaldehyde in a sto-
ichiometric ratio of 1:1.1:1 and 0.1 equivalents ferric hydrogen
sulfate (based on the aldehyde component), a reaction was de-
signed as a model in order to find out the optimum solvent, and
the results are shown in Table 1.
As it can be seen in Table 1, among the various solvents in-
vestigated, CH3CN was found to be the best choice. However,
ethanol, toluene, and benzene afforded satisfying yields. Mod-
erate and poor yields were obtained when the reactions were
carried out in THF and hexane respectively. As can be seen in
Representative spectral data for the selected products are:
(Entry 3): IR (KBr) (υmax, cm−1): 3440, 3325, 2185, 1680, Table 1, the catalyst could be reused without significant loss of
1665, 1595, 1550, 1502, 1365, 1255, 1200, 995, 840. its catalytic activity until at least five times.
TABLE 1
Influence of solvent on Fe(HSO4)3-catalyzed reaction of β-naphthol, malononitrile, and benzaldehyde and reusability study
Solvent
Acetonitril
Dichloroethane
Ethanol
Toluene
Benzene
THF
Hexane
Yielda,b
86
82
78
75
70
∼42
<20
—
Reusabilityc
86d
85e
83f
83g
∼80h
—
aAll the reactions were carried out under reflux condition for 4 h.
bIsolated yields.
cReusability of the recovered catalyst was investigated in CH3CN as the optimum solvent.
d-hReusability of the recovered catalyst in new runs (from run 2 [d] to run 6 [h]).