1590
Y. Chaudier et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 12 (2002) 1587–1590
predicament that led us to devise this family of
molecules, namely that they should be simul-
2. Breyton, C.; Tribet, C.; Olive, J.; Dubacq, J.-P.; Popot, J.-L.
J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 21892.
3. Pucci, B.; Maurizis, J. C.; Pavia, A. A. Eur. Polym. J. 1991,
27, 1101.
4. Barthelemy, P.; Tomao, V.; Selb, J.; Chaudier, Y.; Pucci, B.
Langmuir. 2002, 18, 2557.
5. Kraft, M.-P. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 200.
6. Chabaud, E.; Barthelemy, P.; Mora, N.; Popot, J.-L.;
Pucci, B. Biochimie 1998, 80, 515.
7. Pavia, A. A.; Pucci, B.; Riess, J. G.; Zarif, L. Makromol.
Chem. 1992, 193, 2505.
8. Barthelemy, P.; Ameduri, B.; Chabaud, E.; Popot, J.-L.;
Pucci, B. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1689.
9. Pierre, Y.; Breyton, C.; Kramer, D.; Popot, J.-L. J. Biol.
Chem. 1995, 270, 29342.
10. Chabaud E. These de Doctorat de l’Universite Paris-VI,
2001.
11. Sardet, C.; Tardieu, A.; Luzzati, V. J. Mol. Biol. 1976,
105, 383.
12. Barry, J. M. (Procter & Gamble), US Patent 3194840,
1965.
13. Stern, R. M.; Fan, W. Q.; Blagev, L. P. PCT Int. Appl.,
1997.
14. Szonyi, S.; Vandamme, R.; Cambon, A. J. Fluor. Chem.
1985, 30, 37.
taneously less aggressive than detergents towards
membrane proteins (because of the physical proper-
ties of fluoroalkyl tails), while interacting more
favorably with them than surfactants with a per-
fluorinated alkyl chain (because of the ethyl tip).8,10
The present observations clearly establish the stabi-
lizing effect of the hemifluorinated chain, since the
homologous hydrocarbon surfactant, used under the
same conditions, totally inactivated our test protein.
This discrepancy was not as striking with the two
compounds studied earlier, which, probably thanks
to their large polar heads, were mild detergents in
their hydrocarbon version8,10 and inactivated cyto-
chrome b6 f only after protracted incubation.10 By
analogy with earlier experiments,24 we expect that
following fractionation on sucrose gradients con-
taining C2H5C6F12C2H4–AO, most of C12M will
have desorbed from the protein. On the other
hand, bound lipids ought to have been largely
retained. These points will be the object of direct
investigations.
15. Wirtz, P.; Broell, R. (Hoechst), Ger. Offen. DE 2829594,
1979.
From a practical point of view, C2H5C6F12C2H4–AO 5d
presents significant advantages over the molecules stud-
ied thus far : it is monodisperse and its synthesis is sim-
ple once the hemifluorinated acid has been prepared.
One of the two earlier molecules, C2H5C6F12C2H4–
STHAMTriGal 2b, was also monodisperse, but its
synthesis was particularly difficult and its stability in
aqueous solutions proved insufficient for biochemical
purposes. The second, C2H5C6F12C2H4–STeloTHAM
1b, was appropriately stable, easier if not simple to
produce, but featured a polydisperse, oligomeric polar
head. While detergents with heterogeneous polar heads,
such as Triton X-100, are still widely used in biochem-
istry, their polydispersity is a source of difficulties,
including problematic batch-to-batch reproducibility.
C2H5C6F12C2H4–AO 5d does not suffer from any of
these drawbacks. A full assessment of its potential use-
fulness in biochemistry will require further studies.
16. Clark, L. C., Jr.; Clark, E. W.; Moore, R. E.; Kinnett,
D. G.; Inscho, E. I., Jr. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1983, 122, 169.
17. Corkill, J. M.; Goodman, J. F.; Ogden, C. P. Trans.
Faraday Soc. 1965, 61, 583.
18. Nivet, J. B.; Le Blanc, M.; Riess, J. G. J. Dispersion, Sci.
Technol. 1992, 13, 627.
19. Riess, J. G. New J. Chem. 1995, 19, 891.
20. Riess, J. G.; Krafft, M.-P. Biomaterials 1998, 19, 1529.
21. Mc Quade, D. T.; Quinn, M. A.; Yu, S. M.; Polans, A. S.;
Krebs, M. P.; Gellman, S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
758.
22. Chaudier, Y.; Barthelemy, P.; Pucci, B. Tet. Lett. 2001,
42, 3583.
23. 1H, 13C and 19F nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
spectra were recorded at 250 MHz on a Bruker AC250 spec-
trometer. Chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million
(ppm) relative to tetramethylsilane (1H and 13C spectra) or
CFCl3 (19F spectra). Mass spectra were recorded on a DX300
JEOLapparatus in Fab+. Example : compound 5d. 1H NMR
(DMSO-d6) d=1.09 (m, 6H, NCH2CH3 isomers cis–
3
trans+CH3CH2); 2.21 (m, 2H CH3CH2CF2 JHH=7.3 Hz,
Acknowledgements
3JHF=17 Hz, ), 2.65 (m 2H, CF2CH2); 3.16–3.48 (m, 12H,
CF2CH2CH2+N(CH2CH3)CH2CH2+NO(CH3)2); 3.71 and
3.81 (t, 2H, CH2NO(CH3)2, 3J=8 Hz isomers cis+trans).
19F NMR (CDCl3) d=ꢀ114.63 (CF2CH2CH2CO); ꢀ116.65
(CH3CH2CF2); ꢀ122.16 ((CF2)2CF2CH2CH2CO); ꢀ123.98
(CH3CH2CF2(CF2)2). 13C NMR (CDCl3) d=5.14 (CH3);
13.2 (NCH2CH3); 23.27 (CF2CH2CH2); 25.3 (CH3CH2);
25.73 (CF2CH2CH2); 40.43 (NO(CH3)2+(NCH2CH3); 42.18
(N(Et)CH2CH2); 58.14 (N(Et)CH2CH2); 106.35–122.56
(CF3+CF2); 169.54 (CO) FAB+ MS: m/z=517 (M+H)+.
HR MS m/z=517.1717 (M+H)+, calculated for
C17H25O2N2F12: 516.1646.
This research was supported in part by the inter-
disciplinary program Physique et Chimie du Vivant and
the Groupement de Recherche Colloıdes en Interaction
(GDR 692) of the Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, and by a Human Frontier Science Program
grant to J.-L.P., Y.C. and D.S. were supported by the
Ministere de la Recherche et de la Technologie.
References and Notes
24. Tribet, C.; Audebert, R.; Popot, J.-L. Langmuir 1997, 13,
5570.
1. Le Maire, M.; Champeil, P.; Møller, J. V. Biochim. Bio-
phys. Acta 2000, 1508, 86.