Buncel et al.
63
which K+ is postulated to exert Lewis acid catalysis of nu-
cleophilic substitution at phosphorus (whereas the smaller
size of Li+ results in inhibition rather than activation) (33).
In some proteins, cationic amino acid residues replace
monovalent metal ions, suggesting that monovalent cations
mimic the properties of cationic amino acids in stabilizing
anionic transition states.
Enzyme models have been reported that demonstrate bi-
functional catalysis by two metal ions (34). However, the
best metal-containing systems for acceleration of phosphoryl
transfer employ lanthanides (35), exchange-inert Co3+ sys-
tems, and ligand-coordinated Cu2+ (36).
10. R. Nagelkerke, M.J. Pregel, E.J. Dunn, G.R.J. Thatcher, and E.
Buncel. Org. React. Tartu, 102, 11 (1995).
11. E. Buncel, E.J. Dunn, R.A.B. Bannard, and J.G. Purdon. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 162 (1984).
12. E. Buncel and M.J. Pregel. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1566 (1989).
13. E.J. Dunn and E. Buncel. Can. J. Chem. 67, 1440 (1989).
14. E.J. Dunn, R.Y. Moir, and E. Buncel. Can. J. Chem. 69, 1837
(1990).
15. M.J. Pregel, E.J. Dunn, and E. Buncel. Can. J. Chem. 68, 1846
(1990).
16. M.J. Pregel, E.J. Dunn, and E. Buncel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113,
3545 (1991).
The simple system reported herein reveals multiple metal
ion catalysis of nucleophilic substitution at phosphorus in a
phosphonate monoester monoanion by the monovalent cat-
ions Na+, K+, and Li+. More unexpectedly, the detailed ki-
netic treatment of the data requires possibly three, four, or
five cations in the transition state, even though the putative
pentacoordinate transition state is only dianionic. The pri-
mary limitation to the number of cations involved in the
transition state appears to be the size of the cation and steric
limitations on the number of cations that can access the oxy-
gen ligands. Our results, both kinetic and modeling, reveal
the importance of electrostatic stabilization of the transition
state for phosphoryl transfer that may be effected by multi-
ple cations, either monovalent metal ions or amino acid resi-
dues. The more such cations can be brought into contact
with the anionic transition state, the greater the catalysis ob-
served.
17. M.J. Pregel and E. Buncel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 10 (1993).
18. M.J. Pregel and E. Buncel. J. Org. Chem. 56, 5583 (1991).
19. M.J. Pregel, E.J. Dunn, R. Nagelkerke, G.R.J. Thatcher, and E.
Buncel. Chem. Soc. Rev. 24, 445 (1995).
20. E. J. Dunn and E. Buncel. In Metal ions in biology and medi-
cine. Edited by Ph. Collery, L.A. Poirier, N.A. Littlefield and
J.C. Etienne. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris. 1994.
21. (a) J.R. Jones. Prog. React. Kinet. 7, 1 (1973); (b) A. Papoutsis,
G. Papanastasiou, J. Jannakoudakis, and C. Georgulis. J.
Chim. Phys. 82, 913 (1985).
22. J.L. Kurz. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 987 (1963).
23. R. Cacciapaglia and L. Mandolini. Chem. Soc. Revs. 22, 221
(1993).
24. O.S. Tee. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. (1994).
25. R. Wolfenden. Acc. Chem. Res. 5, 10 (1972).
26. E. Buncel and H. Wilson. Acc. Chem. Res. 12, 42 (1979).
27. R.L. Schowen. In Transition states of biochemical processes.
Edited by R.D. Gandour and R.L. Showen. Plenum, New York.
1978.
Acknowledgment
28. A. Fersht. Enzyme structure and mechanism. 2nd. ed. W.H.
Freeman and Company, New York. 1985.
29. (a) A. Streitwieser, A. Rajca, R.S. McDowell, and R. Glaser. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 4184 (1987); (b) A. Rajca, J.E. Rice, A.
Streitwieser, and H.F. Schaeffer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 4189
(1987).
This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The
award to R.N. of a Postgraduate Scholarship by NSERC is
gratefully acknowledged.
30. J.S. Loran, R.A. Naylor, and A. Williams. J. Chem. Soc.
References
Perkin Trans. 2, 418 (1977).
31. D.E. Wilcox. Chem. Rev. 96, 2375 (1996).
32. S.M. Wilbanks and D.B. McKay. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2251
(1995).
1. R. Nagelkerke, G.R.J. Thatcher, and E. Buncel. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 1, 163 (2003).
2. G.R.J. Thatcher and R. Kluger. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 25, 99
(1989).
3. F.H. Westheimer. Chem. Rev. 81, 313 (1981).
4. W.N. Lipscomb and N. Slater. Chem. Rev. 96, 2375 (1996).
5. W.P. Jencks. Catalysis in chemistry and enzymology. Wiley,
New York. 1969.
6. R. Breslow. Adv. Enzymol. 58, 1 (1986).
7. D. Herschlag and W.P. Jencks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 4665
(1987).
33. R. Zhang, V. Villeret, W.N. Lipscomb, and H.J. Fromm. Bio-
chemistry, 35, 3038 (1996).
34. (a) S. Liu and A.D. Hamilton. Bioorg. & Med. Chem. Lett. 7,
1779 (1997); (b) R. Breslow and B. Zhang. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
116, 7893 (1994)
35. (a) W.W. Butcher and F.H. Westheimer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77,
2420 (1955); (b) A.A. Neverov and R.S. Brown. Inorg. Chem.
40, 3588 (2001); A.A. Neverov and R.S. Brown. J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 2, 1039 (2002).
36. (a) M. Wall, R.C. Hynes, and J. Chin. Angew. Chem. 105,
1696 (1993); (b) D. Wahnon, A.-M. Lebuis, and J. Chin.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 34, 2412 (1995).
8. R.A. Kenley, R.H. Fleming, R.M. Lane, D.S. Tse, and J.S.
Winterle. Inorg. Chem. 23, 1870 (1984).
9. M.J. Pregel, E.J. Dunn, and E. Buncel. Atual. Fis. Quim. Org.
Conf. Latinoam. Fis. Quim. Org. 1st, 110 (1991).
© 2003 NRC Canada