G836
Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 151 ͑12͒ G833-G838 ͑2004͒
2
interface, as evidenced by the well-defined plateau in the corre-
Table II. Surface concentrations „atomsÕcm … of N and H. The
sponding nitrogen profile. In contrast, both ONO-S and ONO-L
stacks exhibited a much broader distribution of nitrogen across the
top oxide/nitride interface, which is consistent with the top oxide
grown by nitride reoxidation. Present SIMS data do not provide
conclusive evidence on the exact distribution and the amounts of
nitrogen in the bottom oxide layers of ONO stacks; unfortunately,
back-side SIMS measurements which could resolve these issues
were not available for this study.
H1, H2, and H3 correspond to the top SiO Õpoly-Si interface, the
nitride layer, and the bottom SiO ÕSi interface, respectively.
2
a
2
Sample
N
H1
H2
H3
1
1
1
1
1
3
6
6
6
6
13
13
13
13
13
BOX
ON
5.2 ϫ 10
1.1 ϫ 10
1.0 ϫ 10
1.0 ϫ 10
—
—
—
3.7 ϫ 10
9.0 ϫ 10
3.0 ϫ 10
2.2 ϫ 10
3.7 ϫ 10
15
14
14
14
4.9 ϫ 10
7.0 ϫ 10
7.2 ϫ 10
7.8 ϫ 10
14
14
15
ONO-S
ONO-L
ONO-TEOS 0.8 ϫ 10
2.8 ϫ 10
4.9 ϫ 10
2.4 ϫ 10
XRR measurements.—Both the density and thickness of indi-
vidual layers in the three ONO specimens as measured by XRR
a
The statistical uncertainties ͑2͒ are about 20%.
͑Fig. 6͒ are summarized in Table III. The statistical uncertainties
2͒ for the thickness and density measurements were about 1%.
͑
The XRR-derived thickness values agreed well with those measured
from the HRTEM images; the scale in the HRTEM images was
calibrated using ͕111͖ lattice fringes of Si. The three ONO speci-
relatively poor reproducibility of electrical properties for the ONO-
TEOS capacitors ͑see the following͒, where the extent of oxidation
could control the electrical performance.
3
mens exhibited similar densities for the bottom oxide ͑2.18 g/cm ͒,
SIMS.—SIMS measurements on the single-layer thermal bottom ox-
ide ͑Fig. 4a͒ revealed a low concentration of nitrogen ͑surface den-
sity 5.2 ϫ 10 atoms/cm , Table II͒ uniformly incorporated in the
which were significantly larger than those of the top oxide layers in
both ONO-S and ONO-TEOS specimens. In contrast, the density of
the top oxide in the ONO-L specimen was comparable to that of the
bottom oxide. The results suggest that longer reoxidation of the
nitride increases the density of the resulting top oxide. The nitride
layers in the three specimens exhibited similar densities of about
1
3
2
layer. The incorporation of N into the oxide layer apparently oc-
curred from the N gas, which was pumped through the chamber
2
15
during the thermal oxidation (T ϭ 900°C). Additionally, the ther-
3
mal oxide contained 3.7 ϫ 1013 atoms/cm2 of hydrogen at the
2.77 g/cm . XRR measurements for the single thermal oxide layer
3
prior to nitride deposition yielded an average density of 2.11 g/cm ,
SiO /Si interface. The hydrogen concentration at the SiO /Si inter-
2
2
3
13
which was significantly lower than the 2.18 g/cm deduced for the
face increased further to 9.0 ϫ 10 upon subsequent deposition
of the nitride layer ͑Fig. 4b, Table III͒; the nitride layer contained
.9 ϫ 10 atoms/cm of hydrogen. The nitrogen content in the ox-
bottom oxide in the ONO stacks. Furthermore, fitting to the experi-
mental XRR data suggested a significant density gradient in the
single thermal oxide layer ͑BOX͒, with the density varying from
1
5
2
4
ide layer of the ON stack was difficult to ascertain because of the
potential trailing of the nitrogen signal into the oxide; still, no clear
3
3
2
.22 g/cm for the bottom third of the layer to 1.99 g/cm for the top
third. These results suggest densification of the upper part of the
bottom oxide layer upon subsequent deposition/growth of the nitride
and the top oxide layers; similar results were reported by Santucci
segregation of the nitrogen to the SiO /Si interface was observed,
2
consistent with the EELS measurements.
The hydrogen profiles for the complete ONO stacks featured
three well-resolved maxima ͑Fig. 5, Table II͒, corresponding to the
1
et al. Such densification can be attributed, at least partly, to the
incorporation of small amounts of nitrogen into the upper part of the
bottom oxide layer. According to XRR, the oxide layers in the ONO
stacks exhibited uniform densities, indicating that the XRR mea-
surements were rather insensitive to the broad nitrogen distributions
in the top oxide layers of the ONO-L and ONO-S specimens.
top SiO /poly-Si interface ͑H1͒, the nitride layer ͑H2͒, and the bot-
2
tom SiO /Si interface ͑H3͒, respectively. The surface density of
2
hydrogen at the SiO /Si interface, H1, decreased progressively on
2
going from ONO-TEOS to ONO-S to ONO-L; that is, the hydrogen
content at the Si/SiO interface diminished with increasing thermal
2
budget used to form the top oxide. The hydrogen content in the
Electrical characterization.—The memory transistors built with
all three ONO stacks ͑ONO-L, ONO-S, and ONO-TEOS͒ featured
overall high endurance/retention characteristics ͑Fig. 7͒. Yet the
transistors based on ONO-L exhibited the lowest reduction of Vt in
the programmed state ͑after cycling and bake͒, while those based on
ONO-TEOS yielded the worst performance. Note that both ONO-L
and ONO-TEOS stacks feature nearly identical thickness for the
nitride layer ͑H2͒ also decreased considerably during growth/
15
2
deposition of the top oxide from 4.9 ϫ 10 atoms/cm for the ON
to (7-7.8) ϫ 1014 atoms/cm for the ONO stacks; however, all three
ONO stacks exhibit similar concentration of hydrogen in the nitride.
This evolution of hydrogen content in the nitride layers is attributed
to the breaking of Si-H bonds at temperatures above 500-600°C
upon growth of the top oxide, while the majority of the N-H bonds,
which are stable up to significantly higher temperatures ͑Ͼ1000°C͒,
remain intact.16
2
g
oxide layers. Furthermore, because the ONO stacks were processed
at the first stages of the device fabrication, the thermal budget used
in the processing of ONO had no influence on either the channel
length or the drain engineering of memory transistors. Therefore, the
differences in the performance of devices based on the different
The SIMS nitrogen depth profiles for the ONO stacks revealed
small ͑Ͻ1 atom/%͒ amounts of nitrogen incorporated into the top
oxide layers; these concentrations were below the detection limits of
the present EELS measurements. ONO-TEOS featured uniform dis-
tribution of nitrogen in the top oxide with a sharp top SiO /Si N
g
In a separate study, we confirmed that different thickness of the nitride layer had no
effect on the Vt degradation.
2
3
4
3
Table III. Thickness „nm… and density „gÕcm … of individual layers in ONO stacks. The statistical uncertainty in the thickness derived from the
HRTEM images is estimated to be Á0.5 nm „2…. The relative statistical uncertainties for the thickness and density measured by XRR are 1%
„
2….
Bottom oxide
Thickness
Nitride
Thickness
Top oxide
Thickness
Density
XRR
Density
XRR
Density
XRR
Specimen
TEM
XRR
TEM
XRR
TEM
XRR
ONO-S
ONO-L
ONO-TEOS
5.8
6.0
6.0
6.4
6.4
6.0
2.18
2.18
2.22
6.4
7.8
6.3
6.6
8.2
6.1
2.76
2.80
2.77
9.1
12.5
13.1
8.7
12.4
13.4
2.04
2.16
2.04