M. Oguz, et al.
Bioorganic Chemistry xxx (xxxx) xxxx
1
3
2.5. Synthesis of compounds 8a and 8b
(proline)), 6.53–7.22 (m, 12H, ArH). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ
(
ppm) 173.6, 168.2, 155.8, 153.24, 134.9, 134.1, 129.3, 127.9, 124.38,
Compounds 7a and 7b (0.95 g) were taken in two separate flasks
123.4, 73.3, 59.1, 45.9, 31.5, 31.2, 29.0, 25.0. The HR-MS data of 13a
and 13b (959.5515 and 733.2795, respectively) supported a molecular
and dissolved in ethanol (50 mL) containing aqueous KOH solution. The
reaction mixture was then stirred and heated at reflux for 8 h. After the
Solvent was removed under reduced pressure, the residue was pre-
cipitated with 0.1 M HCl. The solid material was then filtered and
washed till neutralization with water several time. The target com-
pounds 8a and 8b were obtained as white solid. 8a: Yield 85%. IR:
formula 13a: C58
H
74
N
2
O
10 and 13b: C42
H
42
2
N O10 (Figs. S15 and S19).
2.8. Cell culture
Human cancerous cell lines; A-549 (Lung cancer), PC-3 (Prostate
Cancer), DLD-1 (Colon Cancer), HePG2 (Liver Cancer) cell lines were
supplied from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) and healthy
epithelium cell line, PNT1A was obtained from Sigma Aldrich
(Missouri, ABD). The cells were incubated with DMEM, Ham’s F-12,
RPMI 1640 and EMEM mediums, respectively and supplemented with
10% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 1% L-glutamine and 1% penicillin/
−
1
−1
1
1
732 cm
C]O, 1650 cm
NeC]O. H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ
(
(
ppm) 1.16 (s, 36H, But), 1.96–2.16 (m, 8H, CH (proline), 2.18–2.29
2
m, 8H, CH
2
(proline)) 3.27–3.39 (m, 8H, CH
2
(proline)), 3.51–3.63 (m,
4
H, ArCH
2
Ar)), 3.96 (d, 4H, J = 14.6 Hz, ArCH
2
Ar), 4.38 (s, 4H,
OCH
2
), 4.82 (s, 4H, OCH ), 4.94–5.10 (m, 4H, CH(proline)), 7.17 (s,
2
1
3
8
H, ArH). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO): δ (ppm) 172.7, 168.1, 152.2,
1
47.5, 134.7, 125.3, 4.6, 59.0, 45.6, 34.54, 31.4, 30.8, 29.0, 24.8. 8b:
streptomycin at 37 °C in a 5% CO atmosphere and 95% humidity.
2
−
1
−1
1
Yield 80%. IR: 1729 cm
C]O, 1658 cm
NeC]O. H NMR
Following the confluence, the cells were transferred to 96-well plates
and 6-well plates for cytotoxicity studies and apoptosis/comet assay
studies, respectively.
(
400 MHz, DMSO) δ (ppm): 1.86–2.49 (m, 16H, CH
2
(proline)),
2
.91–3.73 (m, 8H, CH
J = 14.1 Hz, ArCH Ar), 4.55–4.73 (m, 8H, OCH
CH(proline)), 6.86–7.14 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.28 (m, 8H, ArH). C NMR
100 MHz, DMSO): δ (ppm) 174.0, 168.1, 156.5, 135.18, 128.9, 122.4,
2.2, 59.1, 45.6, 31.6, 29.0, 25.0. The HR-MS data of 8a and 8b
1267.6733 and 1043.4077, respectively) supported a molecular for-
mula 8a: C72 16 and 8b: C56 16 (Figs. S7 and S11).
2
(proline) ve 4H ArCH
2
Ar), 3.97 (d, 4H,
2
2
), 4.93–5.31 (m, 4H,
1
3
2.9. Determination of IC50 values for chemical treatment
(
7
The cells were counted with the BioRad TC20 automatic cell counter
and death/live ratio was calculated by using 0.04% “Trypan Blue”.
(
4
H
92
N
4
O
H
60
N
4
O
1 × 10 of the cells were incubated for 24 hr. then treated with various
concentration of L-proline-based calix[4]arenes (3, 8a, 8b.13a, and
13b) ranging between 0 and 200 µM. The viability of the cells and
cytotoxicity of the compounds were determined spectrophotometrically
by using Alamar Blue reagent as an indicator (Invitrogen, Thermo
Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [52]. The IC50 value was cal-
culated from the sigmoidal plot of cell inhibition and statistical analyses
were done by GraphPad Prism 5.0.
2.6. Synthesis of compounds 12a and 12b
Compound 11a and 11b (0.95 g, 1 mmol) were dissolved in dry
THF (50 mL) in two separate flasks and the solution of L-proline methyl
ester hydrochloride (0.66 g 4 mmol) was added dropwise in the pre-
sence of pyridine (0.5 mL). The mixture was allowed to stir for 30 h at
room temperature. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After formation
of products, excess of the solvent was removed off at low pressure. The
residue was extracted with chloroform/water several times. Organic
2.10. Apoptosis assays
5
layer was separated and dried with MgSO
4
. After filtration the solvent
2.5 × 10 of the cells from PNT1A, DLD-1, and A549 cell lines were
was evaporated, and residue was dried at room temperature, 12a: Yield
transferred into 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO for 24 hr.
2
1
7
1
5%. H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ (ppm) 1.05 (s, 18H, But), 1.16 (s,
Then, PNT1A, DLD-1, and A549 cells were treated with equivalent
concentration as IC50 values of compound 3, 8a, 8b.13a and 13b.
Following 48 hr incubation, the cells were incubated with Annexin V
and 7-AAD and analyzed by flow cytometer (BD FACS Aria III, software:
FACS Diva software).
8H, But), 1.85–2.11 (m, 8H, CH
(proline)), 3.65 (s, 6H, OCH
Ar), 4.49–4.63 (m, 4H, OCH
2
CH (proline)), 3.38 (m, 4H,
2
CH
2
3
), 3.68 (bs, 4H, ArCH Ar), 4.38–4.46
2
(
(
m, 4H, ArCH
2
2
), 4.76–4.83 (m, 2H, CH
1
proline)), 7.05 (s, 4H, ArH), 7.10 (s, 4H, ArH). 12b: Yield 65%.
H
NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ (ppm) 1.71–1.96 (m, 8H, CH
2
CH
ve ArCH
), 5.06–5.17 (m,
2
(proline)),
3
4
2
.13 (b, 4H, CH
2
(proline)), 3.41–3.67 (m, 10H, (OCH
3
2
Ar)),
3. Results and discussion
.19–4.31 (m, 4H, ArCH
2
Ar), 4.76–4.82 (m, 4H, OCH
2
H, CH(proline)), 6.41–7.08 (m, 12H, ArH).
The target of this work is to prepare an effective antitumor agent
using calix[4]arene by using L-proline amino acid (Fig. 1). In this re-
gard, compound 3 was designed and readily prepared using simple
reaction conditions (Scheme 1). First of all, p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene (1)
2.7. Synthesis of compound 13a and 13b
Compound 12a and 12b (0.95 g) were dissolved in ethanol (50 mL)
as the precursor was treated with Lewis acid (AlCl ) in the presence of
3
in two separate flasks containing aqueous KOH solution. The reaction
mixture was then stirred and heated at reflux for 8 h. Solvent was re-
moved under reduced pressure, the residue was precipitated with 0.1 M
HCl. The solid material was then filtered and washed till neutralization
with water several time. The target compounds 13a, b was obtained as
phenol to remove upper rim tert-butyl groups to obtain calix[4]arene
(2). Then, the calix[4]arene (2) was reacted with L-proline (Mannich
reaction) in the presence of glacial acetic acid and formaldehyde to
synthesize compound 3 as L-proline functionalized calix[4]arene (3)
reported in published work [46,51].
1
white solid. 13a: Yield 85%. H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ (ppm) 1.07
Compound 8a, 8b, 13a, and 13b were synthesized using an acid
chloride method. The L-proline-substituted calix[4]arene derivatives
8(a,b) and 13(a,b) were obtained in five steps (Scheme 2 and 3). The
parent compounds 1, 4, 5 and 6 were synthesized according to litera-
ture [47–49]. Calix[4]arene tetraester derivative (4) was synthesized in
one step from p-tert-butylcalix[4]arene (1) with a yield of 79% by re-
(
s, 18H, But), 1.13 (s, 18H, But), 1.80–2.27 (m, 8H, CH
2
CH (proline)),
2
3
.33 (m, 4H, CH
2
(proline)), 3.62–3.87 (m, 4H, ArCH Ar), 4.36 (d, 4H,
2
J = 12.05 Hz, ArCH
2
Ar), 4.53–4.72 (m, 4H, OCH ), 4.86–4.91 (m, 2H,
2
13
CH(proline)), 7.12 (s, 4H, ArH), 7.18 (s, 4H, ArH). C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): δ (ppm) 173.6, 167.1, 152.0, 150.6, 147.0, 141.1, 133.5,
1
3
28.8, 127.4, 125.6, 74.19, 59.25, 45.93, 34.35, 33.99, 31.86, 31.36,
acting with methyl bromoacetate and K
2
CO in acetone under reflux
3
1
0.9, 29.1, 24.9, 22.3. 13b: Yield 80. H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO): δ
conditions. Base hydrolysis of tetraester derivative (4) in ethanol pro-
duced acid derivative (5) in 85% yield. In the next step, carboxylic acid
derivative (5) was converted into acid chloride (6) via thionyl chloride
in THF at inert conditions. Compound 7 (a.b) was synthesized using an
(
ppm) 1.71–1.93 (m, 8H, CH
2
CH (proline)), 3.17–3.24 (m, 4H,
2
CH
2
(proline)), 3.48–3.52 (m, 4H, ArCH
2
Ar), 3.96–4.11 (m, 4H,
ArCH
2
Ar), 4.25–4.43 (m, 4H, OCH ), 4.78–4.91 (m, 4H, 2H, CH
2
4