JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2012 195
Table 1 Synthesis of 2-substituted 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one
Entry
Aldehyde/Ketone
X
Time /min
Yield/%
M.p. /°C (found)
M.p. /°C (lit.)
1
2
Benzaldehyde
4-Chlorobenzaldehyde
4-Methoxybenzaldehyde
2-Chlorobenzaldehyde
4-Methylbenzaldehyde
3-Nitrobenzaldehyde
4-Nitrobenzaldehyde
4-Bromobenzaldehyde
4-Fluorobenzaldehyde
Cyclohexanone
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
CH3CO2−
Cl−
5
5
80
81
79
80
86
78
76
79
82
80
83
79
76
73
78
82
70
71
72
74
216–218
204–206
189–191
205–207
227–230
216–218
206–208
200–202
205–206
223–225
250–252
216–218
204–206
189–191
205–207
227–230
216–218
206–208
200–202
205–206
218–22019
205–20616
192–19317
208–21022
233–2342o
216–21717
213–21417
200–20016
205–20616
217–21921
257–2621
3
3
4
5
5
3
6
8
7
15
5
8
9
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
Cyclopentanone
5
Benzaldehyde
5
218–22019
205–20616
192–19317
208–21022
233–2342o
216–21717
213–21417
205–20616
205–20616
4-Chlorobenzaldehyde
4-Methoxybenzaldehyde
2-Chlorobenzaldehyde
4-Methylbenzaldehyde
3-Nitrobenzaldehyde
4-Nitrobenzaldehyde
4-Bromobenzaldehyde
4-Fluorobenzaldehyde
Cl−
5
Cl−
5
Cl−
5
Cl−
5
Cl−
10
5
Cl−
Cl−
5
5
Cl−
Table 2 Comparison the results of tris(hydrogensulfato)boron with other catalysts reported in the literature
Entry
Conditions
Time /min
Yield/%
Ref.
1
2
3
4
5
Ga(OTf)3 (1 mol%), EtOH, 70 oC
35–70
5–7 h
55–75
4–7 h
3–15
71–91
70–94
77–90
70–95
70–86
17
Copolymer-PTSA (0.3 g), EtOH, reflux
18
19
[Bmim]BF4 (3.0 ml), H2O, 80 oC
Montmorillonite K-10 (0.3 g), EtOH, reflux
B(HSO4)3 (0.036 g), solvent-free, 110 oC
20
This paper
Shimadzu spectrophotometer as KBr disks. The NMR spectra were
recorded on a Bruker250MHz spectrometer. Tris(hydrogensulfato)
boron has been prepared according to reported method.26
these cases, the corresponding 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-
ones were obtained in good yields at 110 °C under solvent-
free conditions without formation of any side products. It is
important to note that the synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-
4(1H)-ones could not be achieved in the absence of catalyst.
Moreover, the condensation of ketones with isatoic anhy-
dride and ammonium salts was also successfully carried out
under the same conditions and the corresponding 2,3-dihydro-
4(1H)-quinazolinones were obtained in high yields and short
reaction times (Table 1, entries 10–11). All products are known
compounds and structures of them were confirmed by com-
parison with their known physical and spectral (NMR and IR)
data.16–21
In order to compare the current protocol with previously
published methods for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-
4(1H)-one, we carried out the studies described in Table 2.
These results, clearly demonstrate that tris(hydrogensulfato)
boron is a good catalyst with respect to reaction times and
yields of the obtained products.
In conclusion, we have described a successful strategy for
the efficient and rapid synthesis of 2-substituted 2,3-dihydro-
quinazolinones in a one-pot, three-component cyclocondensa-
tion reaction of isatoic anhydride, aldehydes or ketones and
ammonium salts using tris(hydrogensulfato)boron as catalyst
at 110 °C under solvent-free conditions. The notable features
of this procedure are high yields of products, operational
simplicity, enhanced reaction rates, cleaner reaction profiles
and ease of isolation of products, which make this process
quite simple, more convenient and environmentally benign for
the synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones.
Synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones; general procedure
A mixture of isotoic anhydride (1 mmol), aldehyde/ketone (1 mmol),
ammonium acetate or chloride (1 mmol) and tris(hydrogensulfato)bor
on (0.036 g) was stirred at 110 °C for the appropriate time indicated
in Table 1. The progress of reactions was monitored by TLC (ethyl
acetate/n-hexane). After completion of the reaction, a solid was
obtained. It was washed with water and purified by recrystalisation
from ethanol to afford pure products.
2-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one: IR(KBr):
3424, 3300, 3184, 2924, 1655, 1611, 1515 cm−1; 1H NMR (250 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ = 5.74 (1H, s, CH), 6.65–6.73 (2H, m, ArH), 7.08 (2H,
s, NH), 7.16–7.24 (3H, m, ArH), 7.48–7.60 (3H, m, ArH), 8.27 (1H, s,
N-CO).
2-(4-Nitrophenyl)-2,3-Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one: IR(KBr):
3445, 3280, 2922, 2854, 1647, 1610, 1519, 1519 cm−1; 1H NMR
(250 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 5.88 (1H, s, CH), 6-63–6.75 (2H, m, ArH),
7.21–7.27(1H, m, ArH), 7.33 (1H, s, NH), 7.58(1H, d, J = 7.75 Hz,
ArH), 7.71 (2H, d, J = 7.5, ArH), 8.23 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, ArH), 8.53
(1H, s, NH–CO).
2-(4-Methylphenyl)-2,3-Dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one: IR(KBr):
3312, 3194, 3062, 2934, 1658, 1610 cm−1, 1H NMR (250 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ = 2.26 (3H, s, CH3), 5.67 (1H, s, CH), 6.60–6.72 (2H, m,
ArH), 7.04 (1H, s, NH), 7.14–7.23 (3H, m, ArH), 7.34 (2H, d, J =
7.75 Hz, ArH), 7.57 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, ArH), 8.23 (1H, s, NH–CO).
2-(2-Chlorophenyl)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one: IR(KBr):
3361, 3194, 3064, 2922, 1646, 1615, 1503 cm−1, 1H NMR (250 MHz,
DMSO-d6): δ = 6.11 (1H, s, CH), 6.69–6.75 (2H, m, ArH), 7.0 (1H, s,
NH), 7.20–7.23 (1H, m, ArH),7.36–7.40 (3H, m, ArH), 7.63 (2H, d,
J = 6.25 Hz, ArH), 8.21 (1H, s, NH–CO).
Experimental
Received 6 January 2012; accepted 17 February 2012
Paper 1201086 doi: 10.3184/174751912X13310556980246
Published online: 17 April 2012
All chemicals were commercially available and used without further
purification. Melting points were recorded on an electrothermal type
9100 melting point apparatus. The IR spectra were obtained on a 4300