Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201908553
COMMUNICATION
The published reaction conditions were adapted for the use of
methylene blue as photocatalyst and, after having acquired the
kinetic profile, the reaction was performed on a window ledge,
under solar irradiation (see Supplementary Information) with a
reaction control system. In Figure 5 the results from the solar
experiments are presented. The use of the reaction control
system resulted in a similar reaction yield (between 69 and 78%),
with a significantly higher productivity during the second day (up
-2
-1
to 21.2 mmol∙m ∙h ) due to the higher irradiance.
Figure 4. Outdoor trifluoromethylation of mesitylene in the blue LSC-PM. (A)
Reaction conditions. (B) Reaction yield of the samples collected during the
experiment. The first sample was taken after 60 minutes, and after that, one
sample every 5 minutes was acquired. (C) Light intensity measured at the
device edge and proportional changes in residence time during the experiment
operated by the autonomous reaction control system.
In 1912, Giacomo Ciamician challenged the scientific community
to imagine a chemical industry run on solar energy.[34] Inspired by
Ciamician’s grand vision, we have developed a novel reactor
design that constitutes a versatile, inexpensive and photon
efficient solution to harvest solar energy for synthetic
applications.[35] Several different photon-driven reactions are
showcased, ranging from photochemical oxidations to
metallaphotoredox couplings. With the adoption of a reaction
control system, stable product quality can be ensured even during
fluctuating irradiance conditions. Notably, the LSC-PM design
reported here is mostly transparent to IR radiation, which avoids
heating of the reactor. This also means that a further increase in
the fraction of utilizable solar light can be achieved by combining
it with other solar energy conversion technologies capable of
making productive use of such low-energy photons, like
photovoltaic cells.[36]
All of these examples showcase the relative simplicity in adapting
photochemical reactions for solar applications using the LSC-PM.
However, as highlighted in the introduction, the productivity
afforded by solar photochemistry has a physical limit of several
moles per square meter and per hour of solar irradiated area.[6]
This means that solar photochemistry is especially a viable option
for high added-value chemicals such as drugs and fragrances.
Therefore, to provide a realistic application for the LSC-PM
concept, the continuous solar-driven synthesis of artemisinin[31]
was taken as an example. Artemisinin and its derivatives are the
most effective drugs against malaria, and their yearly production
is not sufficient to meet the world’s needs.[32,33] A solar-based
production plant would be particularly suited for those limited
resource settings where the disease is endemic. The crucial step
in the semisynthetic approach is the biomimetic photooxygenation
of dihydroartemisinic acid to the corresponding endoperoxide,
which yields, after acid-catalyzed Hock cleavage, artemisinin
Acknowledgements
D.C. and T.N. would like to acknowledge the European Union for
a Marie Curie ITN Grant (Photo4Future, grant number 641861).
P.R.P. received a Marie Curie European post-doctoral fellowship
(
MOSPhotocat, Grant No. 793677). K.G. and P.H.S. thanks for
generous financial support provided by the Max Planck Society
and DFG InCHeM (FOR 2177).
(
Figure 5, top).
Keywords: Flow Chemistry • Photoredox Catalysis • Solar
Energy • Luminescent Solar Concentrator • Photochemistry
[
[
1]
2]
N. S. Lewis, Science 2016, 351, aad1920.
B. Parida, S. Iniyan, R. Goic, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2011, 15, 1625-
1
636.
3]
4]
[
[
Y. Tian, C. Y. Zhao, Appl. Energy, 2013, 104, 538-553.
J. H. Montoya, L. C. Seitz, P. Chakthranont, A. Vojvodic, T. F. Jaramillo,
J. K. Norskov, Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 70-81.
[
[
[
5]
6]
7]
P. Anastas, N. Eghbali, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301-312.
M. Oelgemoeller, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9664-9682.
C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic, D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem. Rev. 2013, 113,
5
322-5363.
8]
9]
[
[
N. A. Romero, D. A. Nicewicz, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 10075-10166.
D. Cambié, C. Bottecchia, N. J. W. Straathof, V. Hessel, T. Noel, Chem.
Rev. 2016, 116, 10276-10341.
10] P. Esser, B. Pohlmann, H.-D. Scharf, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33,
009-2023.
[
2
[
[
11] D. Cambié, T. Noel, Top. Curr. Chem. 2018, 376, 45.
12] V. A. Rajkumar, C. Weijers, M. G. Debije, Renew. Energy 2015, 80, 308-
315.
[
13] M. G. Debije, P. P. C. Verbunt, Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 12-35.
[
14] D. Cambié, F. Zhao, V. Hessel, M. G. Debije, T. Noel, Angew. Chem. Int.
Figure 5. Methylene blue-catalyzed photooxidation of dihydroartemisinic acid
under natural sunlight irradiation in a red LSC-PM. The experiments were
performed in the Max Plank Institute for Colloids and Interfaces of Potsdam
Ed. 2017, 56, 1050-1054.
15] F. Zhao, D. Cambié, V. Hessel, M. G. Debije, T. Noel, Green Chem. 2018,
0, 2459-2464.
16] W. G. J. H. M. van Sark, K. W. J. Barnham, L. H. Slooff, A. J. Chatten, A.
[
2
[
(
Germany) on the 26th and 29th of June 2018, under different sky conditions
cloudy in the first case, and sunny in the second). The different irradiance
Buechtemann, A. Meyer, S. J. McCormack, R. Koole, D. J. Farrell, R. Bose, E.
E. Bende, A. R. Burgers, T. Budel, J. Quilitz, M. Kennedy, T. Meyer, C. De Mello
Donega, A. Meijerink, D. Vanmaekelbergh, Opt. Express 2008, 16, 21773-
(
received by the reactor resulted in vastly different solar productivities but with
similar yields thanks to the reaction control system.
2
1792.
17] S. P. Pitre, C. D. McTiernan, H. Ismaili, J. C. Scaiano, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
013, 135, 13286-13289.
[
2
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.