Scheme 1
number of modifications of the BINOL scaffold aimed at
resulting chiral ligands have been investigated as precursors
to new titanium-based catalysts. Worthy of note, the 7 and
7′ positions cannot be accessed through direct electrophilic
modification routes that are commonly used in order to
modify BINOL. Most importantly, the configurational in-
tegrity of the homochiral precursors is not perturbed under
the conditions described herein. More forceful conditions
allow one to introduce substituents into the 6 and 6′ positions.
Nucleophilic displacement of aromatic fluorine is a well-
known reaction with a wide scope and utility.6 A variety of
nucleophiles are known to participate in this chemistry. When
5,5′,6,6′,7,7′,8,8′-octafluoro-1,1′-binaphthyl (2b) was sub-
jected to the substitution protocol with sodium methoxide,
the nucleophilic displacement of fluorine did take place but
a complicated mixture of poly(methoxylated) products
signaled lack of regioselectivity. Gratifyingly, the presence
of the methoxy substituents at the 2 and 2′ positions in bis-
(methyl) ether 2c was sufficient to secure high regioselec-
tivity of the methoxylation reaction (Scheme 1). Double
substitution resulted in the 7,7′-bis(methoxy) product 3a in
improving catalytic performance have been documented.3 We
recently reported the synthesis and first catalytic applications
of F8BINOL (2a), an isostere of BINOL with modulated
coordination preferences and remarkable configurational
stability under a wide range of reaction conditions.4 The
application of 2a in titanium-catalyzed asymmetric sulfide
oxidation with organic hydroperoxides revealed increased
activity of the derived catalyst compared to that of BINOL.5
The opposite sense of chiral induction in asymmetric
sulfoxidation was observed for BINOL and F8BINOL of the
same absolute configuration, indicating significant difference
in the nature of the catalytically active species obtained from
these two ligands. A related goal of our research is to develop
mild routes to diversely functionalized ligands with axial
chirality based on the electronically perturbed polyfluoro-
binaphthol scaffold. The challenge of improving catalytic
efficiency can be approached by a ligand modification
reaction that proceeds in high yield on a sub-millimole scale
without concomitant racemization. A useful process should
accomplish one (or both) of the following goals: (a)
introduce substituents into positions that have electronic
influence over the hydroxyl groups (e.g., 6 and 6′) or (b)
introduce substituents into the positions that modulate steric
effects (e.g., 7,7′ or 3,3′). If these requirements are met, rapid
generation of diverse catalyst libraries should become
straightforward. The present Letter highlights the possibility
of selective introduction of a variety of substituents at the 7
and 7′ positions via nucleophilic substitution of fluorine. The
(3) For representative applications of BINOL derivatives in asymmetric
catalysis, see: (a) Noyori, R. Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis;
Wiley: New York, 1994. (b) Pu, L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2405. (c) Rosini,
C.; Franzini, L.; Rafaelli, A.; Salvadori, P. Synthesis 1992, 503. (d) Maruoka,
K.; Itoh, T.; Shirasaka, T.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
310. (e) Kitajima, H.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 1996, 568. (f) Reetz, M. T.; Merk,
C.; Naberfeld, G.; Rudolph, J.; Griebenow, N.; Goddard, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 5273. (g) Chan, A. S. C.; Zhang, F. Y.; Yip, C. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4080. (h) Morita, T.; Arai, T.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki,
M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1445. (i) Iida, T.; Yamamoto, N.;
Matsunaga, S.; Woo, H.-G.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998,
37, 2223. (j) Kobayashi, S.; Kusakabe, K.; Komiyama, S.; Ishitani, H. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4220. (k) Nakamura, Y.; Takeuchi, S.; Ohgo, Y.;
Curran, D. P. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 351. (l) Ishitani, H.; Yamashita, Y.;
Shimizu, H.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5403.
(4) Yudin, A. K.; Martyn, L. J. P.; Pandiaraju, S.; Zheng, J.; Lough, A.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 41.
(5) Martyn, L. J. P.; Pandiaraju, S.; Yudin, A. K. J. Organomet. Chem.
2000, 603, 98.
(6) Welch, J. T.; Peters, D.; Miethchen, R.; Il’chenko, A. Y.; Ru¨diger,
S.; Podlech, J. In Organo-fluorine Compounds, 4th ed.; Baasner, B.,
Hagemann, H., Tatlow, J. C., Eds.; Georg Thieme Verlag: Stuttgart, 2000;
Vol. E10b/Part 2, pp 293-459.
3434
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 22, 2000