Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
hydrazones. While the dibenzylhydrazone still furnished the
The mechanistic details of the catalytic coupling reaction
expected product 3b, albeit in moderate yield, the much less
electron-donating diphenylhydrazone resulted in essentially
no reaction (3c). Hydrazones bearing cyclic amino groups,
that is, 1-piperidinyl and 4-morpholinyl, participated effi-
ciently in the coupling reaction giving the desired products 3d
and 3e, respectively, in high yields. Most interestingly, the
monosubstituted N-methylhydrazone yielded the ring-fluori-
nated 4,4-difluoropyrazol-5-one 3 f as the sole product, which
presumably originates from spontaneous lactamization of the
amino ester coupling product.[22] Next we investigated the
effect of substituents on the aryl moiety of various benzalde-
hyde-derived N,N-dimethylhydrazones. Good results were
obtained with para- and meta-substituted aryls. Notably,
substrates with electron-withdrawing para substituents
afforded the products 3g–m in higher yields than those
bearing electron-donating substituents (3o–r). However,
sterically hindered ortho-substituted aryls afforded the
desired coupling product in low yield (3u). The reaction
tolerated a wide range of substituents/functional groups,
including nitro, cyano, carboxylic ester, formyl, acetyl, and
halide (Cl, Br), thus offering opportunities for further
diversification. However, the presence of a vinyl substituent
on the aryl moiety (3t) led only to decomposition of the
substrate. Importantly, several heterocyclic aldehyde-derived
hydrazones [i.e. pyridinyl, quinolinyl, and pyrazolyl (3v–3x)]
proved suitable substrates for the transformation wherein the
heterocyclic ring was untouched. An ethyl glyoxylate hydra-
zone participated also efficiently in the reaction (3y).
Unfortunately, as illustrated with 3z, aliphatic aldehyde-
derived hydrazones proved to be more challenging substrates
for this reaction, thus giving only small amounts of the desired
product under the standard reaction conditions. Finally, the
robustness of this transformation was further demonstrated
by performing the synthesis of 3m on a 2.5 mmol scale (64%
yield).[23] Importantly, the scope of the reaction coupling
partners was not restricted to ethyl bromodifluoroacetate 2
(Scheme 3). Indeed, the coupling reaction of 1a with the
remain unclear at the present stage. However, given the
known propensity of Pd0 species to promote the formation of
difluoromethyl radicals from fluoroalkyl halides through
SET,[10–13,16,17] the possibility of a radical/SET pathway that
would initiate the catalytic reaction was briefly explored. Our
standard coupling reaction of 1a with 2 (93% yield) was thus
repeated in the presence of the radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-
tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO; 1.0 equiv). Interest-
ingly, formation of coupling product 3a was completely
inhibited, and the TEMPO–CF2CO2Et adduct 8[24] was
formed in 31% yield as estimated by 19F NMR spectroscopy
(Scheme 4a). The reaction was also conducted in the presence
Scheme 4. Preliminary mechanistic studies. a) Inhibition experiment
using TEMPO. b) Radical clock experiment with a-cyclopropylstyrene.
of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT; 1.0 equiv) which
again led to inhibition of the coupling process. Moreover,
repeating the reaction in the presence of 5 mol% of the
electron transfer scavenger p-dinitrobenzene (1:1 ratio with
respect to the metal) caused a dramatic drop in the reaction
yield (25%). Finally, we performed a radical clock experi-
ment using a-cyclopropylstyrene (9) as a radical trapping
agent.[25] When 9 was reacted with 2, formation of the known
ring-expanded product 10 was observed (18% yield as
estimated by 19F NMR spectroscopy), thus confirming that
a free CF2CO2Et radical can be generated under our standard
reaction conditions (Scheme 4b).[16b]
bromodifluoroacetamide
4,[17b]
or
even
2-(bromo-
difluoromethyl)benzo[d]oxazole (6),[17d] was made possible
with some modifications of the reaction conditions (potas-
sium phosphate as the base in DMF at 1208C) to afford the
desired coupling products 5 and 7, respectively.
These preliminary experiments seem to confirm that
a radical/SET pathway may initiate the coupling reaction.
Furthermore, deuterium-labeling studies showed no primary
kinetic isotope effect (KIE; kH/kD = 1.14) in the experiment
using
a deuterated benzaldehyde-derived N,N-dimethyl-
hydrazone (1n-d) thus indicating that cleavage of the
À
azomethine C H bond is not involved in the rate-determining
step of the process.[20] A plausible mechanism is depicted in
Scheme 5 and takes into account the previous observations.
The process would begin with single-electron transfer from
the Pd0 metal complex to the fluoroalkyl bromide to form the
PdIBr complex A and difluoroalkyl radical intermediate B,
with subsequent recombination of these two species to give
the regular PdII oxidative addition adduct C.[26] Subsequent
electrophilic palladation of the hydrazone, followed by
deprotonation of the resulting cationic intermediate D
would generate the azomethinyl PdII complex E. Finally,
reductive elimination would form the coupling product and
Scheme 3. Scope of coupling partners. DMF=N,N-dimethylform-
amide.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1885 –1889
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1887