8666 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 36, 2000
White et al.
made these nonadrides the objects of much interest,10 and a
synthesis of (()-9 and (()-10 was completed in 1999 by
Nicolaou.1 A unifying biogenetic hypothesis has been proposed
which accommodates the nonadrides, including 9 and 10, within
a matrix of head-to-head and head-to-tail dimers of a putative
dialkylmaleic anhydride intermediate.12
forded 13 in high yield, a result which can be readily understood
if 13 adopts a U-shaped conformation similar to that seen in
the X-ray crystal structure of the bis-p-bromophenylhydrazide
of byssochlamic acid. Before beginning our own synthesis of
3, the anticipated preference for the cis configuration of side
chains was substantiated through a conformational analysis in
which energy minimization using a PM3 algorithm predicted a
difference of ∼2.6 kcal/mol between cis (3c) and trans (3t)
isomers in favor of the former. The factor which destabilizes
1
Structural elucidation of 1, 2, and 3 by the Barton group13 at
Imperial College built upon earlier degradative work addressed
at 1 and 2 by Sutter14 and Kraft and led to the proposal 3,
exclusive of stereochemistry, for byssochlamic acid. Confirma-
tion of this assignment and designation of the cis relative
configuration was obtained through X-ray crystallographic
analysis of the bis-p-bromophenylhydrazide of 3.16 The absolute
configuration of byssochlamic acid was determined by degra-
dative experiments which caused fission of the nine-membered
ring and gave products of known stereochemistry.17 Unfortu-
nately, these degradative studies gave no hint of the relative
stability of cis and trans isomers of 3, a detail which proved to
be significant in our synthetic endeavors.
15
3
t relative to 3c is the pseudoaxial orientation of the propyl
chain, which creates a transannular steric interaction with an
endo hydrogen of the methylene adjacent to the ethyl substituent
(Figure 1). Interestingly, the nine-membered rings of both 3c
and 3t adopt a chairlike conformation, according to this
computation, and are, therefore, quite different in shape from
the ring conformation seen in the crystal structure of byssoch-
The first synthesis of a member of the nonadride family was
18
that of (()-3 by Stork. This pioneering accomplishment, which
created the nine-membered ring of 3 through Beckmann
fragmentation of oxime 11, provided the initial indication that
a cis orientation of ethyl and n-propyl substituents was more
stable. Reduction of 12 under thermodynamic conditions af-
1
6
lamic acid bis-p-bromophenylhydrazide. An important con-
sequence of this conformational analysis of 3 is that, if the center
bearing the propyl group is stereomutable, the absolute sense
of an asymmetric synthesis of byssochlamic acid can be
controlled through correct orientation of the remote ethyl
substituent. This point is addressed in more detail below.
A seemingly inconsequential addendum to the Imperial
College structural elucidation of byssochlamic acid17 was the
disclosure that the natural product undergoes a reaction to give
a saturated isomer when irradiated in tetrahydrofuran. Two
structures were considered for “photobyssochlamic acid,” one
(14) derived from intramolecular, parallel [2 + 2] cycloaddition
and the other (15) corresponding to a crossed photoaddition.
Since pyrolysis of the photoisomer of byssochlamic acid failed
to regenerate 3, the conclusion was drawn that its structure was
15. The implication that 14 should have reverted to byssochlamic
acid upon thermolysis was a proposition which played an
important role in guiding our synthesis plan for 3.
The concept of a [2 + 2] photoaddition-cycloreversion
strategy for assembling carbocyclic structures has long been
recognized as a powerful paradigm in medium-ring synthesis.19
It was first exemplified in the context of natural product
(
10) (a) Davies, H. M. L.; Calvo, R.; Ahmed, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
8, 1737. (b) Sgarbi, P. W. M.; Clive, D. L. J. Chem. Commun. 1997, 2157.
c) Armstrong, A.; Critchley, T. J.; Mortlock, A. A. Synlett 1998, 552. (d)
3
(
20
21
synthesis by Lange and Wender in their approaches to
germacranolide sesquiterpenes, and others soon followed their
Kwon, O.; Su, D.-S.; Meng, D.; Deng, W.; D’Amico, D. C.; Danishefsky,
S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1877, 1880. (e) Waizumi, N.;
Itoh, T.; Fukuyama, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6015. (f) Chen, C.;
Layton, M. E.; Shair, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10784. (g)
Frontier, A. J.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Koppel, G. A.; Meng, D. Tetrahedron
2
2
lead. Our own plan for constructing the 1,5-cyclononadiene
nucleus of 3 (Scheme 1) hinged upon connection of two
(17) Baldwin, J. E.; Barton, D. H. R.; Sutherland, J. K. J. Chem. Soc.
1965, 1787.
1
998, 54, 12721. (h) Bio, M. M.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
1
21, 890.
(
(18) Stork, G.; Tabak, J. M.; Blount, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
4735.
(19) Schaumann, E.; Ketcham, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1982,
21, 225.
(20) (a) Lange, G. L.; Huggins, M.-A.; Neidert, E. Tetrahedron Lett.
1976, 4409. (b) Lange, G. L.; McCarthy, F. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978,
4749.
(21) (a) Wender, P. A.; Lechleiter, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
267. (b) Wender, P. A.; Hubbs, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 365. (c)
Wender, P. A.; Letendre, L. J. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 367.
(22) (a) Wilson, S. R.; Phillips, L. R.; Pelister, Y.; Huffman, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 7373. (b) Williams, J. R.; Callahan, J. F. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 405. (c) Williams, J. R.; Callahan, J.
F. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4475, 4479. (d) Randall, M. L.; Lo, P. C.-K.;
Bonitatebus, P. J. Jr.; Snapper, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4534
and ref 5 cited.
11) (a) Nicolaou, K. C.; Baran, P. S.; Zhong, Y.-L.; Choi, H.-S.; Yoon,
W. H.; He, Y.; Fong, K. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1699.
b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Baran, P. S.; Zhong, Y.-L.; Fong, K. C.; He, Y.; Yoon,
W. H.; Choi, H.-S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 1676.
12) Moss, M. O. In Microbial Toxins; Ciegler, A., Ed.; Academic
Press: New York & London, 1971, 6, 381.
13) Baldwin, J. E.; Barton, D. H. R.; Bloomer, J. L.; Jackman, L. M.;
Rodriguez-Hahn, L.; Sutherland, J. K. Experientia 1962, 18, 345.
14) (a) Sutter, H.; Wijkman, N. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1933, 505, 248. (b)
(
(
(
(
Sutter, H.; Wijkman, N. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1935, 519, 97. (c) Sutter, H.;
Rottmayr, F.; Porsch H. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1936, 521, 189.
15) (a) Kraft, K.; Porsch, H. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1937, 527, 168. (b) Kraft,
K. Lieb. Ann. Chem. 1937, 530, 20.
16) Hamor, T. A.; Paul, I. C.; Monteath-Robertson, J.; Sim, G. A.
Experientia 1962, 18, 352.
(
(