Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Article
nitroimidazole conjugate was obtained. 808-NM1 (0.50 g, yield 18%,
HPLC purity analysis 99.3%). 1H NMR (400 Hz, CDCl3): 8.25 (d, J =
8.0 Hz, 2H); 7.74 (S, 2H); 7.62 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 7.45−7.42 (m,
4H); 7.27 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H); 7.19 (s, 2H); 6.24 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 2H);
4.53 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H); 4.31 (J = 4.0 Hz, 4H); 2.65 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H);
2.28−2.25 (m, 4H), 1.84−1.83 (m, 2H); and 1.66 (s, 12H). 13 C NMR
(100 Hz, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6): 172.74, 148.71, 145.07,
143.63, 142.38, 141.50, 129.05, 128.48, 127.89, 126.92, 125.71, 123.03,
111.76, 102.08, 49.51, 47.22, 41.55, 28.34, 27.91, 26.27, 21.50, and
20.78. HRMS [M − Br]+: calculated 761.3325, found 761.3354. 808-
NM2 (0.79 g, yield 26%, HPLC purity analysis 99.4%). 1H NMR (400
Hz, CDCl3): 8.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 7.67 (s, 2H); 7.61 (d, J = 2 Hz,
2H); 7.43−7.40 (m, 4H); 7.27−7.25 (m, 2H); 7.15 (s, 2H); 7.29 (d, J =
6.0 Hz, 2H); 4.34 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H); 4.18 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H); 2.66 (t, J
= 4.0 Hz, 4H); 1.83−1.82 (m, 2H); 1.76−1.69 (m, 8H); 1.64 (s, 12H);
1.42−1.39 (m, 4H); and 1.33−1.30 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 Hz,
DMSO-d6): 172.60, 148.41, 144.96, 143.41, 142.49, 141.50, 129.06,
128.29, 128.27, 126.57, 125.61, 122.98, 111.97, 102.01, 49.75, 49.44,
44.17, 30.06, 27.91, 27.27, 26.25, 26.08, 25.99, 21.51, and 20.80. HRMS
[M − Br]+: calculated 845.4264, found 845.4262. 808-NM3 (0.50 g,
yield 18%, HPLC purity analysis 99.5%). 1H NMR (400 Hz, CDCl3):
8.45 (s, 2H); 8.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 7.62 (s, 1H); 7.61 (s, 1H); 7.47
(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 7.42 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H); 7.28 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H);
6.14 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H); 4.24 (d, J = 4 Hz, 4H); 4.17 (d, J = 4 Hz, 4H);
2.59 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 4H); 2.37 (s, 12H); 2.22−2.20 (m, 4H); 1.79−1.77
(m, 2H); and 1.67 (s, 12H). 13C NMR (100 Hz, DMSO-d6): 172.58,
148.63, 145.98, 145.57, 143.54, 142.30, 141.47, 129.05, 126.85, 125.72,
123.02, 122.25, 111.85, 101.97, 49.49, 44.25, 41.54, 27.90, 27.79, 26.25,
20.83, and 13.19. HRMS [M − Br]+: calculated 789.3638, found
789.3661.
Cell Uptake and Subcellular Location. The cellular uptake of
808-NM2 was imaged and determined among MCF-10A, MCF-7, and
4T1 cells by laser confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis. All
cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into six-well plates and cultured
for 24 h. Cells were incubated in 1.25 μM 808-NM2 for 30 min and then
stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Beyotime,
Shanghai) for 10 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) three times, cells were imaged using a Leica DMI6000 inverted
microscope with a Leica TCS SP5 confocal scanning system
(excitation: 808 nm channel). For flow cytometry analysis, the cells
were trypsinized and collected with PBS. Cellular fluorescence was
measured on a flow cytometer using an Accuir C6 flow cytometer (BD,
Ann Arbor, MI). The cellular uptake of 808-NM2 was compared in
MCF-7 and 4T1 cells in a normoxia chamber (21% O2) with a CO2
incubator (Thermo Fisher Scienticfic, CO2 Incubator Steri-Cycle), a
hypoxic chamber (5% O2) with a tri-gas incubator (Thermo Fisher
Scienticfic, CO2 Incubator 3131) or an anaerobic incubator (Thermo
Fisher Scienticfic, Forma 1029) under hypoxia (1% O2), respectively.
MCF-7 and 4T1 cells were seeded into six-well plates at a density of 5 ×
105 cells/well in 2 mL complete medium and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h.
Cells were incubated with 1.25 μM 808-NM2 for 30 min at 37 °C. After
washing three times with PBS, cells were stained with DAPI for 10 min.
Then, the cells were collected and washed three times with PBS.
Cellular fluorescence was observed by laser confocal microscopy or
measured by flow cytometry analysis. For subcellular localization,
MCF-7 and 4T1 cells (5 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into six-well
plates and cultured for 24 h. All cells were incubated with 1.25 μM 808-
NM2 for 1 h, followed by MitoTracker Green (M7514) for 25 min.
Then, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with
DAPI for 10 min in the dark. Finally, 1 mL 70% glycerinum was added
to each well and imaged by confocal microscopy.
nm. The cell viabilities of MCF-7 and 4T1 cells were compared under
hypoxic and normoxic conditions during incubation with 808-NM2.
MCF-7 and 4T1 cells (3 × 103 cells/well) were cultured with 100 μL of
medium in 96-well plates for 24 h. The cells were cultured with different
concentrations of 808-NM2 in a hypoxic chamber (5% O2, 5% CO2) or
normoxia chamber (5% CO2) for 24 h. The cell viabilities of MCF-7
and 4T1 cells were then tested by the MTT method as mentioned
above. To observe multimodel anticancer activities, the cell viabilities of
MCF-7 and 4T1 cells were determined after exposure to ionizing
radiation under hypoxic and normoxic conditions. MCF-7 and 4T1
cells (3 × 103 cells/well) were cultured with 100 μL of medium in 96-
well plates for 24 h. The cells were cultured with different
concentrations of 808-NM2 in a hypoxic chamber (5% O2, 5% CO2)
for 6 h. Then, the cells were treated with ionizing radiation (1 and 3 Gy)
using RS2000 X-ray irradiator (RadSource Technologies) and
incubated for 72 h. The cell viabilities were tested by MTT method
as mentioned above.
Animals and Tumor Xenografts. Female BALB/c nude mice (4−
6 weeks old) were purchased from the laboratory animal center of Third
Military Medical University. All animal studies were approved by the
Ethics Committee of the Third Military Medical University
(Chongqing, China). For the tumor growth assay, nude mice were
injected with 4T1 cells in 200 μL of serum-free RPMI-1640 medium at
2 × 105 cells/mouse in the left flank. Mice were randomized into three
groups and treated with tail vein injection of normal saline or 10 mg/kg
808-NM2. The next day, for the 808-NM2 radiation group, only tumors
were exposed to 4 Gy ionizing radiation with a lead cover. Small animal
biological irradiator (Pxi X-RAD 320) was used for ionizing radiation
treatment. Using a lead cover, only tumors were exposed to X-ray
irradiation. Every other day, the mice were treated with 808-NM2 and
irradiated three times. Tumor size was measured by calipers once every
2 days. On the 11th day after the first injection of 808-NM2, all of the
tumors in the different groups were dissected from the mice and
weighed. Lung organs were collected after mice were sacrificed at the
end of observation. H&E staining or immunochemical staining of
tumors or organs for pathological histology analysis was performed.
Patients-Derived Xenografts. Human samples were obtained
from all patients with written informed consent. Both written informed
consent and the study protocol were approved by the ethics committee
of the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (namely,
Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Approved No.
KY2020002). Breast cancer fragments (0.5 cm) were obtained from the
Department of Oncology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical
University and implanted in the left flanks of nude mice. Twenty days
after tumor implantation, mice were divided into three groups: the
control group, 808-NM2 (10 mg/kg) group, and 808-NM2 irradiation
group (4 Gy). For the control and 808-NM2 groups, mice were injected
with saline or 10 mg/kg 808-NM2, respectively. The next day, mice in
the 808-NM2 radiation group were exposed to 4 Gy ionizing radiation.
Every other day, the mice were treated with 808-NM2 and irradiated
three times. Tumor size was measured by calipers once every 2 days.
The mouse body weight was also recorded during treatment. On the
11th day after the first injection of 808-NM2, all tumors in the different
groups were dissected from the mice and further stained for different
kinds of immunohistochemistry analysis.
In Vivo NIR Imaging. In vivo NIR imaging was performed using a
small animal imaging system (Perkin Elmer, IVIS Spectrum). For the
assessment of the tumor-targeting ability of 808-nitroimidazole
conjugates, BALB/c mice bearing 4T1 xenografts were established
and injected at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg by tail vein. In vivo NIR imaging was
performed at different times after injection. After 24 h, mice were
sacrificed, and the main organs, including tumors, were collected. Ex
vivo NIR imaging was performed to observe their distribution. To assess
the tumor-targeting ability in the PDX model, athymic nude mice were
injected with 808-NM2 conjugates at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg via the tail
vein. For comparison, the same protocols were performed, but nothing
was implanted in mice as a sham-operated group.
In Vitro Anticancer Effect. The cytotoxicity of MCF-7 and 4T1
cells (3000 cells/well) was evaluated by a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-
2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, M5655, Sigma-Aldrich)
assay. MCF-7 and 4T1 cells were cultured with 100 μL of medium in
96-well plates and cultured for 24 h. Then, the cells were incubated with
different concentrations of 808-NM2 for 72 h at 37 °C. The solution
was discarded. Then, 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to
each well and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The crystals were dissolved in
200 μL of DMSO, and the optical density (O.D.) was recorded at 490
Statistics Analysis. Data were reported as the mean and standard
error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent experiments;
the p value was evaluated and calculated using a two-tailed paired t-test.
3388
J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 3381−3391