A R T I C L E S
Hollmann et al.
An interesting alternative is to directly regenerate the catalyti-
cally active monooxygenase component. Direct regeneration of
monooxygenases has mostly been described for cytochrome
P450 enzymes. Direct reduction with dithionite15 and indirect
methods using cobalt(III) sepulchrate as mediator between the
enzyme and an electrode16,17 or elementary zinc18 have been
reported. By cathodic reduction of the iron-sulfur protein
putidaredoxin, Vilker and co-workers were able to omit the
reductase component and NADPH in cell-free hydroxylation
and epoxidation reactions.19,20 However, direct regeneration of
a FAD (or FMN)-dependent monooxygenase has not been
reported so far. Typically, such enzymes show turnover numbers
of about 10-20 s-1 21,22 for product formation and are therefore
very interesting catalysts.
In the present study we show that a FADH2-dependent
monooxygenase (in this case StyA) can be regenerated directly
by means of non-native redox catalysts such as [Cp*Rh(bpy)-
(H2O)]2+ (Scheme 1, lower panel). We show that this cell-free
chemoenzymatic approach can be used for the production of
enantiopure epoxides via asymmetric synthesis. In particular,
we compare the non-native redox catalyst to the native reductase
with respect to conversion rate, substrate range, and optical
purity of the resulting products. Finally, we identify the factors
that influence the extent to which the catalytic regeneration
reaction is coupled to the biocatalytic epoxidation reaction,
provide a quantitative measure for the coupling efficiency, and
compare it with the “native”, fully enzymatic approach.
Experimental Section
Organometallic complexes such as (2,2′-bipyridyl)(penta-
methylcyclopentadienyl) rhodium ([Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+) have
been described as potent redox catalysts for the specific
regeneration of nicotinamide cofactors (NAD(P)H) using either
formate or a cathode as source of reducing equivalents.23-26
Recently, we reported that [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ can also
reduce alloxazine derivatives such as FAD or FMN at rates
comparable to those obtained for NAD(P)H regeneration.27
Therefore, [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ appears to be an ideal can-
didate to catalyze the direct regeneration of FAD-dependent
monooxygenases for synthetic purposes.
Styrene monooxygenase (StyAB) from Pseudomonas sp.
VLB12028 catalyzes the specific (S)-epoxidation of a broad range
of m- and p-, as well as R- and â-, substituted styrene
derivatives.29 The enzyme is composed of a FAD-dependent
monooxygenase component (StyA) that catalyzes the epoxida-
tion reaction and a NADH-dependent reductase component
(StyB) that delivers the reducing equivalents from NADH to
StyA via FADH2.30 StyAB may be classified as a member of
the “two-component flavin-diffusible monooxygenase” fam-
ily.30,31 Partially purified StyAB from recombinant Escherichia
coli has been used for cell-free biocatalytic epoxidation reactions
using formate dehydrogenase for the in situ regeneration of
NADH (Scheme 1, upper panel).32
Chemicals. Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased
from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) in the highest quality available and
used without further purification. Appropriate safety precautions were
taken where suitable, especially when working with rhodium, 3-chlo-
roperoxobenzoic acid, and organic solvents.
[Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ was synthesized according to literature meth-
ods33 by addition of 2 equiv of 2,2′-bipyridine to a suspension of
[{Cp*RhCl(µ-Cl)2}] (Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) in methanol. [Cp*Rh-
(bpy)Cl]Cl was precipitated upon addition of diethyl ether. Aqueous
stock solutions were stored at room temperature for several months
without detectable loss of activity. Racemic epoxides were produced
from the corresponding styrene derivatives with 3-chlorobenzoic acid
according to literature procedures.34
StyA (95% pure) was obtained from recombinant E. coli JM101
(pSPZ10)35 as described.32 StyB was purified from recombinant E. coli
JM109 (pTEZ302) as reported previously.36
Methods. Determination of the Catalytic FAD Reduction by
[Cp*Rh(bpy)H]+ and StyB. The rates of the formate-driven, [Cp*Rh-
(bpy)(H2O)]2+-catalyzed reduction of FAD and FMN were measured
in oxygen-free media by monitoring the depletion of oxidized FAD
(FMN) at λ ) 450 nm (ꢀ ≈ 10 000 M-1 cm-1). Alternatively, the fast
reoxidation of reduced isoalloxazine in O2-containing media leading
to hydrogen peroxide was quantified on the basis of either the depletion
of O2 using a Clark electrode (Strathkelvin Instruments Ltd., Glasgow,
UK) or the formation of hydrogen peroxide, determined using the
colorimetric assay of Tanaka and co-workers.37 Each method gave
comparable values for the catalytic performance of [Cp*Rh(bpy)-
(H2O)]2+ [e.g. at 37 °C and c(formate) ) 150 mM turnover frequencies
for [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ of 74.3, 69.9, and 67.6 h-1 were determined
using FAD depletion, H2O2 formation, or O2 consumption, respectively].
The activity of StyB was determined on the basis of the hydrogen
peroxide formation rate.
General Reaction Conditions for the Chemoenzymatic Epoxi-
dation Reactions. Unless indicated otherwise, the chemoenzymatic
epoxidations were performed in 2.0-mL Eppendorf tubes placed in an
Eppendorf 5436 thermomixer. The reactions were performed in a 50
mM potassium phosphate buffer containing 150 mM sodium formate,
pH 7.6. After supplementation with StyA and FAD, the reaction mixture
was maintained at the indicated reaction temperature. The reactions
were started by the simultaneous addition of [Cp*Rh(bpy)(H2O)]2+ and
(14) Drauz, K.-H.; Waldmann, H. Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, 2nd
ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002.
(15) Fang, X.; Halpert, J. R. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1996, 24, 1282-1285.
(16) Estabrook, R. W.; Shet, M. S.; Fisher, C. W.; Jenkins, G.; Waterman, M.
R. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1996, 333, 308-315.
(17) Faulkner, K. M.; Shet, M. S.; Fisher, C. W.; Estabrook, R. W. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92, 7705-7709.
(18) Schwaneberg, U.; Appel, D.; Schmitt, J.; Schmid, R. D. J. Biotech. 2000,
84, 249-257.
(19) Reipa, V.; Mayhew, M. P.; Vilker, V. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1997, 94, 13554-13558.
(20) Mayhew, M. P.; Reipa, V.; Holden, M. J.; Vilker, V. L. Biotechnol. Prog.
2000, 16, 610-616.
(21) Walsh, C. T.; Chen, Y.-C. J. Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 342-352.
(22) Palfey, A.; Massey, V. In ComprehensiVe Biological Catalysis; Sinnott,
M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, London, 1998; Vol. III, pp 83-154.
(23) Ruppert, R.; Herrmann, S.; Steckhan, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 6583-
6586.
(24) Westerhausen, D.; Herrmann, S.; Hummel, W.; Steckhan, E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1529-1531.
(25) Lo, H. C.; Buriez, O.; Kerr, J. B.; Fish, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1999, 38, 1429-1432.
(32) Schmid, A. In DiVision of Biochemical Technology at the 224TH ACS
National Meeting; Boston, 2002, p BIOT 128.
(33) Ko¨lle, U.; Gra¨tzel, M. Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 572-574.
(34) Schwetlick, K. In Organikum: Organisch-chemisches Grundpraktikum;
Barth Verlagsgesellschaft: Leipzig, 1993; Vol. 19, pp 272-274.
(35) Panke, S.; Wubbolts, M. G.; Schmid, A.; Witholt, B. Biotech. Bioeng. 2000,
69, 91-100.
(36) Otto, K.; Hofstetter, K.; Witholt, B.; Schmid, A. In FlaVins and FlaVopro-
teins; Chapman, S. K., Perham, R. N., Scrutton, N. S., Eds.; Rudolf
Weber: Berlin, 2002; pp 1027-1033.
(37) Saito, Y.; Mifune, M.; Nakashima, S.; Odo, J.; Tanaka, Y. Talanta 1987,
34, 667-669.
(26) Hollmann, F.; Schmid, A.; Steckhan, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2001,
40, 169-171.
(27) Hollmann, F.; Witholt, B.; Schmid, A. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2002,
19-20, 167-176.
(28) Panke, S.; Witholt, B.; Schmid, A.; Wubbolts, M. G. Appl. EnVirom.
Microbiol. 1998, 64, 2032-2043.
(29) Schmid, A.; Hofstetter, K.; Feiten, H.-J.; Hollmann, F.; Witholt, B. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 732-737.
(30) Schmid, A. Unpublished results.
(31) Gala´n, B.; D´ıaz, E.; Prieto, M. A.; Garc´ıa, J. L. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 183,
627-636.
9
8210 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 27, 2003