A. V. Shindikar, C. L. Viswanathan / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 1803–1806
1805
Table 1. Characterization data of test compounds
Compound Mp (°C) Yield (%) Spectral analysis
I
295–297 62.08
FT-IR (KBr): 3522 (O–H), 3067 (C–H, Ar), 1697 (C@O, acids), 1626 (C@O, amide), 1539 (C@N, imine),
253 ((CH –C)
H NMR (DMSO-d
s, 1H, –CONH–N@), 4.14, 2.50 (m, 8H, piperazine), 1.41 (s, 9H, t-butyl)
1
3 3
)
1
6
): 11.5 (s, 1H, O–H), 8.86 (s, 1H, C-2 of quinolone), 8.44, 8.12 (d, 2H, Ar), 5.32
(
II
304–308 62.31
FT-IR (KBr): 3481 (O–H), 3283 (N–H), 2980 (C–H aromatic), 2851 (C–H aliphatic), 1728 (C@O acids),
6135 (C@O amide), 1026 (C–H, cyclopropyl)
H NMR (DMSO-d ): 8.76 (s, 1H, C-2 of quinolone), 8.46, 7.80 (m, 4H, Ar) 7.20 (s, 2H, NH
m, 1H, cyclopropyl), 3.33 (m, 6H, 3,5-dimethyl of piperazine), 2.83–2.49 (m, 6H, piperazine), 1.05
m, 4H, cyclopropyl)
1
6
2
), 3.96
(
(
III
IV
210–212 74.33
FT-IR (KBr): 3499 (O–H), 3329 (N–H), 2930 (C–H, Ar), 2892 (C–H aliphatic), 1630 (C@O amide), 1572
N–H amide)
(
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
.6 (m, 1H, –CONH–), 4.08 (m, 2H, –CH2), 3.6, 2.5 (m, 8H, piperazine), 2.6 (m, 2H, –CH
t-butyl)
6
): 8.62 (s, 1H, C-2 of quinolone), 8.1, 8.0 (d, 2H, Ar), 7.7, 7.6, 7.4 (m, 2H, pyrazine),
5
2
), 1.23 (s, 9H,
226–228 72.61
FT-IR (KBr): 3545 (O–H), 3323 (N–H), 2930 (C–H, Ar), 2852 (C–H, –CH
2
–), 1631 (C@O, amide)
): 9.1 (s, 1H, O–H), 8.83 (s, 1H, C-2 of quinolone), 8.71, 8.58, 7.82 (m, 3H,
pyrazine), 7.3 (m, 2H, NH ), 5.6 (m, 3H, pyrazine), 4.06 (m, 1H, cyclopropyl), 4.03, 3.73 (m, 4H, –CH
.46 (m, 6H, 3,5-dimethyl of piperazine), 2.91–2.50 (m, 6H, piperazine), 1.63 (m, 4H, cyclopropyl)
1
H NMR (DMSO-d
6
2
2
–),
3
isonicotinic acid hydrazide (0.013 M) at 135 °C for 1 h.
Finally removal of DMF and recrystallization from eth-
anol–DMF (70:30) gave compounds I (Scheme 1) and II
(
Scheme 2), respectively.
Condensation of equimolar quantities (0.0086 M) of
compound vi/x with 2(pyrazinamido)-1-bromoethane
in presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate in
2
0 ml of DMF at 150 °C for 1 h followed by removal
of DMF, washing with water and recrystallization from
DMF–water (60:40) gave compounds III (Scheme 1)
and IV (Scheme 2), respectively.
Figure 1. Effect of test compounds I–IV and sparfloxacin on the
survival rate (determined on 30th day) and inhibition of CFUs
observed on Lowenstein–Jensen medium expressed as percentage.
Open columns represent survival rate and striped columns represent
Compounds ix and x were synthesized as per literature
,7
6
methods
points and spectral analysis. Characterization data for
and were characterized by their melting
%
inhibition of CFUs in spleen in mice.
*
Group 1-Infected mice without any drug treatment (Àve control); 2-
test compounds I–IV is given in Table 1.
Sparfloxacin treated (300 mg/kg) (+ve control); 3-Sparfloxacin treated
(
200 mg/kg) (+ve control); 4-Compound I treated (200 mg/kg); 5-
Compound II treated (200 mg/kg); 6-Compound III treated (200 mg/
kg); 7-Compound IV treated (200 mg/kg).
The test compounds were evaluated for anti-tubercular
8
activity in Swiss albino mice using sparfloxacin (SPFX)
as a standard (dose equivalents correlating anti-tubercu-
lar activity in mice: SPFX: 60 mg/kgꢀINH: 25 mg/
9
,10
kgꢀRIF: 20 mg/kg).
A group of five mice were used
for testing each compound. The mice were infected
6
intravenously with M. tuberculosis H Rv (ꢀ10 organ-
3
7
0
.3
.25
0.2
.15
.1
Splenomegaly
isms) and after 24 h, compounds I–IV were administered
orally six times a week for a period of four weeks. The
parameters studied were survival rate, spleen weights,
gross lung lesions, and colony forming units (CFUs) in
the spleen. Groups treated with III and sparfloxacin
exhibited 100% survival rate while those treated with I,
II, and IV gave a value of 80% (Fig. 1). All treated
groups exhibited reduction of splenomegaly (Fig. 2).
Groups treated with III, IV, and sparfloxacin showed
absence of lung lesions, while those with I and II showed
few lung lesions. Groups treated with II, III, and spar-
floxacin showed 55%, 75%, and 56% inhibition of
CFUs, respectively, at a dose of 200 mg/kg (Fig. 1).
0
0
0
0.05
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
group*
Figure 2. Effect of test compounds I–IV and sparfloxacin on spleen
*
enlargement observed during tuberculosis infection in mice. Group 1-
Infected mice without any drug treatment (Àve control); 2-Sparflox-
acin treated (300 mg/kg) (+ve control); 3-Sparfloxacin treated (200 mg/
kg) (+ve control); 4-Compound I treated (200 mg/kg); 5-Compound II
treated (200 mg/kg); 6-Compound III treated (200 mg/kg); 7-Com-
pound IV treated (200 mg/kg); 8-Non-infected mice.
Results of the study indicate potent anti-tubercular
activity for test compounds I–IV. Compound III with