advantages arise from their easy handling and safe storage
without deterioration. Noyori et al. discovered that the
combination of basically inert LiH and catalytic amounts of
ZnCl2 can be used as a reagent in reduction chemistry.12
Additionally, a recent report appeared on the use of the
CaH2–ZnBr2 combination in the reduction of imines.13 This
prompted us to react a solution of (DIPP-nacnac)ZnCl in
THF with commercially available CaH2, the cheapest
available metal hydride. We found quantitative conversion
of the chloride to (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH (Scheme 1) and the raw
product is essentially pure.
The convenient synthesis and the good accessibility of the
hydride functionality in (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH encourages
further exploration of this complex.
Notes and references
Fig. 1 The crystal structure of (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH (ORTEP plot
with 50% probability; overlay with van der Waals radii). Selected
bond distances (A) and angles (1): Zn–N1 1.950(1); Zn–N2 1.952(1);
Zn–H 1.46(2); N1–Zn–N2 97.33(4); N1–Zn–H 131.5(7); N2–Zn–H
131.2(7).
z For (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH: mp 211 1C. Anal. Calc. (Found) for
C29H42N2Zn: C 71.96 (71.89); H 8.75 (8.94)%. 1H NMR (C6D6,
3
3
300 MHz): d 1.11 (d, J(H,H) = 6.9 Hz, 12H, iPr), 1.27 (d, J(H,H)
6.9 Hz, 12H, iPr), 1.68 (s, 6H, Me backbone), 3.18 (sept, J(H,H)
=
=
3
6.9 Hz, 4H, iPr), 4.39 (s, 1H, ZnH), 5.02 (s, 1H, H backbone), 7.12 (m, 6H,
aryl). 13C NMR (C6D6, 75 MHz): 23.2 (iPr-Me), 23.5 (Me backbone),
24.8 (iPr-Me), 28.4 (iPr-CH), 96.0 (CH backbone), 123.9 (aryl), 126.2
(aryl), 141.8 (aryl), 144.6 (aryl), 168.1 (CMe backbone).
not give rise to the appearance of another set of signals
that could be assigned to a dimeric species. However, a
significant shift of the signals for the hydride (Dd = 0.31 ppm)
and the iPr-methyl group directed towards the hydride
(Dd = 0.09 ppm) was observed, i.e. those groups most affected
by possible dimer formation (all other signals hardly shifted).
This indicates a possible monomer–dimer equilibrium which
at higher temperatures shifts to the monomer side on account
of entropy. From pulsed gradient spin echo (PGSE) diffusion
measurements10 on a solution of (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH in
toluene-d8 at 20 1C, a hydrodynamic radius of 5.2(1) A
could be deduced. As measurements on monomeric
(DIPP-nacnac)ZnMe gave an equal hydrodynamic radius,
(DIPP-nacnac)ZnH in toluene at 20 1C is largely monomeric.
(DIPP-nacnac)ZnH is the first monomeric zinc hydride
y Crystal data for (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH: C29H42N2Zn, M = 484.04,
monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 12.639(3), b = 15.856(3),
c = 14.020(3) A, b = 105.528(10)1, U = 2707.1(10) A3, Z = 4,
Dc = 1.188 g cmꢁ3, F(000) = 1040, m(Mo Ka) = 0.925 mmꢁ1
,
3.8
r
2y
r
61.01, 50 265 reflections measured, 7976 unique
(Rint = 0.045) were used in all calculations, R1 = 0.0278 [I 4 2s(I)]
and wR2 = 0.0777 (all data); max/min. residual electron density:
0.41/ꢁ0.35.
1 Y. Gao, K. Harada, T. Hata, H. Urabe and F. Sato, J. Org. Chem.,
1995, 60, 290; M. Uchiyama, S. Furumoto, M. Saiko, Y. Kondo and
T. Sakamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11425; A. Looney,
R. Han, I. B. Gorrell, M. Cornebise, K. Yoon and G. Parkin,
Organometallics, 1995, 14, 274; M. Rombach, H. Brombacher and
H. Vahrenkamp, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2002, 153; W. Marciniak,
K. Merz, M. Moreno and M. Driess, Organometallics, 2006, 25, 4931.
2 H. Hao, C. Chunming, H. W. Roesky, G. Bai, H.-G. Schmidt and
M. Noltemeyer, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1118.
complex with
a three-coordinate Zn center. All other
complexes with a terminal Zn–H functionality show four-fold
coordination at Zn and the only other zinc hydride complex
with a three-coordinate Zn center is a dimer with bridging
hydride atoms: [(2,6-DIPP-phenyl)ZnH]2.11
3 W. Klaui, U. Schilde and M. Schmidt, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36,
1598.
4 J. Spielman, G. Jansen, H. Bandmann and S. Harder, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 6290.
¨
5 M. Krieger, B. Neumuller and K. Dehnicke, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem., 1998, 624, 1563.
¨
The monomeric nature of (DIPP-nacnac)ZnH and its low
metal coordination number make this complex an interesting
precursor in reduction chemistry, catalysis, material chemistry
or for mimicking zinc–enzyme processes. Therefore we
developed an even more attractive synthetic route for this
potentially useful complex.
6 R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1976, 32, 751.
7 S. P. Green, C. Jones and A. Stasch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 9079.
8 B. Cordero, V. Go
J. Echeverria, E. Cremades, F. Barraga
Trans., 2008, 2832.
´
mez, A. E. Platero-Prats, M. Reve
´
s,
´
n and S. Alvarez, Dalton
9 A. P. Dove, V. C. Gibson, P. Hormnirun, E. L. Marshall,
J. A. Segal, A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Dalton Trans.,
2003, 3088; M. Cheng, D. R. Moore, J. J. Reczek,
B. M. Chamberlain, E. B. Lobkovsky and G. W. Coates, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 8738.
Salt metathesis between the well-accessible (DIPP-nacnac)-
ZnCl and a metal hydride would be preferable over both the
amidoborane, and the zinc fluoride/silane routes.2,3 In such
syntheses highly reactive metal hydrides like NaH or KH are
usually used. In recent years, however, there has been an
increased interest in implementing cheaper, more inert, metal
hydrides like LiH and CaH2. Both hydrides show extremely
high lattice energies and do not react with a large variety of
functional groups (hence the application of CaH2 as a versatile
drying agent for many organic liquids). Other operational
10 M. Valentini, H. Ruegger and P. S. Pregosin, Helv. Chim. Acta,
2001, 84, 2833.
¨
11 Z. Zhu, R. J. Wright, M. M. Olmstead, E. Rivard, M. Brynda and
P. P. Power, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 5807.
12 T. Ohkuma, S. Hashiguchi and R. Noyori, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
217.
13 T. Aida, N. Kuboki, K. Kato, W. Uchikawa, C. Matsuno and
S. Okamoto, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 1667.
ꢂc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
3456 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 3455–3456