Fig. 3 Optimized structure of the Cl2Q·2–o-L complex.16
Fig. 1 Plots of K vs. [L] for electron transfer from CoIITPP to Cl4Q, in the
presence of o- (5), m- (:) and, p-L (-) in deaerated DMSO at 298 K.
The ESR spectrum of the Cl2Q·2–o-L complex produced in
the electron transfer reduction of Cl2Q by CoIITPP in the
presence of o-L (0.10 M) was observed at 298 K. The g value
(2.0056) and the proton hyperfine coupling constants (aH
=
been confirmed that a mono-chelating compound (benzanilide)
has no effect as the hydrogen bond donor in the present system.
This indicates that the hydrogen bond formation is quite
sensitive to the geometry of interaction between the dichelating
hydrogen bond donor and the semiquinone radical anion.
When Cl4Q is replaced by a weaker electron acceptor,
0.268 mT) are virtually the same as observed in the absence of
o-L (g = 2.0056, aH = 0.268 mT). This indicates the
interaction between Cl2Q·2 and o-L is largely electrostatic.
This work was partially supported by a Grant–in–Aid for
Scientific Research Priority Area (No. 13031059) from the
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technol-
ogy, Japan.
2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone (Cl2Q: E0 vs. SCE = 20.19
red
V), electron transfer from CoIITPP to Cl2Q becomes en-
dergonic, and the electron transfer equilibrium is shifted to the
reactants side.14 When o-L is added to the CoIITPP–Cl2Q
system, the equilibrium is drastically shifted to the product side
and the observed first-order rate constant of electron transfer
(kobs) increases linearly with increasing o-L concentration as
shown in Fig. 2.15 No such enhancement of electron transfer
was observed with m-L or p-L.
Notes and references
1 (a) S. Scheiner, Hydrogen Bonding, Oxford University Press, Oxford,
1997; (b) S. Fukuzumi, in Electron Transfer in Chemistry, ed. V.
Balzani, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 4, pp. 3–67.
2 (a) A. Niemz and V. M. Rotello, Acc. Chem. Res., 1999, 32, 44; (b) V.
M. Rotello, in Electron Transfer in Chemistry, ed. V. Balzani, Wiley-
VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 4, pp. 68–87.
3 E. Breublinger, A. Niemz and V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
117, 5379.
4 A. O. Cuello, C. M. McIntosh and V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2000, 122, 3517.
5 (a) B. G. Malmström, Acc. Chem. Res, 1993, 26, 332; (b) S. Ferguson-
Miller and G. T. Babcock, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 2889; (c) C. W.
Hoganson and G. T. Babcock, Science, 1997, 277, 1953.
6 M. Y. Okamura and G. Feher, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1992, 61, 861.
7 R. A. Isaacson, E. C. Abresch, F. Lendzian, C. Boullais, M. L. Paddock,
C. Mioskowski, W. Lubitz and G. Feher, in The Reaction Center of
Photosynthtic Bacteria: Structure and Dynamics, ed. M.-E. Michel-
Beyerle, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 353–367.
8 (a) P. J. OAMalley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 5093; (b) P. J.
OAMalley, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 248.
9 For the intramolecular hydrogen bond formation of p-benzosemiqui-
none radical anion, see: S. Fukuzumi, Y. Yoshida, K. Okamoto, H.
Imahori, Y. Araki and O. Ito, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 6794.
10 S. Fukuzumi and K. Ohkubo, Chem. Eur. J, 2000, 6, 4532.
11 Electrochemical measurements were performed on a BAS 100B
electrochemical analyzer in deaerated DMSO containing 0.01 M
Fig. 2 Plots of kobs vs. [Cl2Q] for electron transfer from CoIITPP (5.0 3
1026 M) to Cl2Q in the presence of o-L (0.10 (5), 0.30 (:) M) in DMSO
at 298 K.
2
Ph4As+ClO4 as a supporting electrolyte at 298 K. A three-electrode
system was used with a platinum working electrode, a platinum wire
counter electrode, and an Ag/AgNO3 (0.01 M) reference electrode.
12 Observation of the Cl4Q·2 absorption band is obscured due to the
overlap with the absorption band of CoIIITPP+ which has a much larger
absorption coefficient than Cl4Q·2.
The ortho-selective activation of electron transfer from
CoIITPP to p-benzoquinone derivatives by L described above is
rationalized by the computed structure of the Cl2Q·––o-L
complex in which two hydrogens of o-L interact with the
carbonyl oxygen of Cl2Q·– as shown in Fig. 3, where the
hydrogen bond distance is 1.64 Å.16,17 A similar structure was
obtained for the Cl2Q·––m-L complex, but the hydrogen bond
distance (1.82 Å) is significantly longer than the distance in the
Cl2Q·––o-L complex. In the case of the Cl2Q·2–p-L complex,
only one hydrogen interacts with the carbonyl oxygen of Cl2Q·2
because of the geometrical restriction. In such a case, only o-L
is effective in accelerating the electron transfer reduction of
Cl2Q by regioselective hydrogen bond formation in DMSO.17
13 No superhyperfine due to the Co nucleus was observed, indicating no
covalent interaction in the CoIIITPP+–Cl4Q·2 complex.
14 The K value of Cl2Q obtained is 78 M21 which is more than 400 times
smaller than that of Cl4Q.
15 From the plot of kobs vs. [Cl2Q], the K ( = ket/k2et) value obtained at
[Cl2Q] = 0.3 M is 1.9 3 104 M21 which is ca. 240 times larger than the
value of the o-L free system.
16 Theoretical calculations were performed on a COMPAQ DS20E
computer using the Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) program
version 1999.02 developed by Baerends et al.17 The two phenyl groups
in L were replaced by methyl groups in the calculation.
17 G. Te Velde and E. J. Baerends, J. Comput. Phys., 1992, 99, 84.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1984–1985
1985