Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
140
P. Chakraborty et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 436 (2015) 139–145
Table 1
2. Experimental section
2.1. Physical methods and materials
Crystallographic data and details of refinements for complex 1.
Empirical formula C21H35Cu2N9O9 F(000)
1416
24.71
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
684.66
monoclinic
P21/n
8.8950(11)
17.1010(13)
19.0790(19)
97.475(10)
2877.5(5)
4
hmax (°)
Reflections collected 8822
Elemental analyses (carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen) were per-
formed using a Perkin–Elmer 240C elemental analyzer and copper
content was estimated gravimetrically. Infrared spectra were
recorded on KBr disks (400–4000 cmꢁ1) with a Perkin–Elmer RXI
FTIR spectrophotometer. Electronic spectra (200–800 nm) were
measured at room temperature on a Shimadzu UV-3101PC by
using dry methanol/DMSO as medium. Cyclic voltammetric and
DPV measurements were performed by using a CH1106A poten-
tiostat with glassy carbon (GC) as working electrode, Pt-wire as
counter electrode and Ag, AgCl/sat KCl as reference electrode.
Magnetic susceptibility measurements over the temperature range
5–300 K was performed at a magnetic field of 0.0750 T using a
MPMS SQUID-VSM dc magnetometer. Correction for the sample
holder, as well as the diamagnetic correction, which was estimated
from the Pascal constants, [23] was applied.
All solutions were purged with dinitrogen prior to measure-
ments. All other chemicals used in this study were obtained from
commercial sources and used as received. Solvents were dried
according to standard procedure and distilled prior to use. 4-
Methyl-2,6-diformylphenol was prepared according to the litera-
ture method [24]. N-(2-Aminoethyl)pyrrolidine was purchased
from Sigma–Aldrich Chemical Company and used as received.
Unique reflections
Rint
Observed I > 2
4687
0.044
2733
383
r(I)
Parameters
b (°)
Goodness of fit (F2)
0.917
V (Å3)
R1 (I > 2
r(I))
0.0498
0.1298
ꢁ0.545, 0.372
Z
wR2
Dcalc (mg mꢁ3
)
1.542
Dq
(e Å3)
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
The complex was synthesized adopting template synthesis
technique in which a methanolic solution of copper(II) nitrate tri-
hydrate was treated with the Schiff-base formed in situ by the reac-
tion between 4-methyl-2,6-diformylphenol and N-(2-aminoethyl)
pyrrolidine. Complex 1 was obtained after the addition of a
water–methanolic solution of sodium azide (four times with
respect to the copper salt). The IR spectrum of the complex shows
a band due to C@N stretch at 1646 cmꢁ1 and skeletal vibration at
1553 cmꢁ1. Broad band centered at 1383 cmꢁ1 indicates the pres-
ence of weakly coordinated nitrate ion in the complex. A strong
band observed at 2079 cmꢁ1 confirms the presence of bridging
azide ion in the complex (see Table 2).
2.2. Synthesis of the complex
2.2.1. [Cu2(L)(H2O)2(N3)](NO3)2 (1)
3.2. Description of crystal structure
A methanolic solution (5 mL) of N-(2-aminoethyl)pyrrolidine
(0.256 g, 2 mmol) was added dropwise to a heated methanolic
solution (10 mL) of 4-methyl-2,6-diformylphenol (0.164 g,
1 mmol), and the resulting mixture was refluxed for half an hour.
Then, a methanolic solution (15 mL) of Cu(NO3)2ꢂ3H2O (0.604 g,
2.5 mmol) was added to it and the reflux was further continued
for 2 h. After cooling down the reaction mixture at room tempera-
ture a water–methanolic (1:1) solution (5 mL) of sodium azide
(0.325 g, 5 mmol) was added dropwise at stirring condition. The
resulting mixture was allowed to stir for 3 h and filtered. After fil-
tration, the clear deep-green solution was kept in a CaCl2 desicca-
tors in dark. Square-shaped deep-green crystals, suitable for X-ray
analysis, were obtained from the filtrate after a few days (yield
70%). Anal. Calc. for C21H35Cu2N9O9: C, 36.84; H, 5.15; N, 18.41;
The structural analysis of compound 1 shows that it comprises
of a dicationic species [Cu2L(H2O)2(N3)]2+ counterbalanced by two
nitrate anions. The ORTEP drawing of the complex is shown in
Fig. 1, while a selection of coordination geometry parameters is
reported in Table 3. The metals are chelated by the ligand L
through the phenoxido oxygen, the imino and amino pyrrolidine
nitrogen donors, and bridged by a l1,1 azide, completing their
square pyramidal coordination sphere through aqua ligands. The
Cu–O(phenoxo) bond lengths are comparable being of 1.982(3)
and 1.960(3) Å for Cu1 and Cu2, respectively. The length of the
Cu–N(imino) bond distances (1.924(4) and 1.916(5) Å) are similar
to those involving the bridging azide (1.983(4) and 1.998(5) Å).
On the other hand the Cu–N(pyrrolidine) ones are slightly longer,
of 2.037(4) and 2.028(4) Å, for the different hybridization of N
atom donors. On the other hand the water molecules at apical
Found: C, 36.94; H, 4.89; N, 18.47%; IR:
(skeletal vibration) 1553 cmꢁ1 (H2O) 3434 cmꢁ1
2079 cmꢁ1
m
(C@N) 1653 cmꢁ1
(Nꢁ3 1
)
; m
;
m
;
m
.
Table 2
2.3. X-ray data collection and crystal structure determination
Coordination bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for complex 1.
Cu(1)–N(1)
Cu(1)–N(2)
Cu(1)–O(1)
Cu(1)–N(5)
Cu(1)–O(1w)
Cu(1)–O(8)
N(1)–Cu(1)–N(2)
N(1)–Cu(1)–O(1)
N(1)–Cu(1)–N(5)
N(1)–Cu(1)–O(1w)
N(2)–Cu(1)–O(1)
N(2)–Cu(1)–N(5)
N(2)–Cu(1)–O(1w)
O(1)–Cu(1)–N(5)
O(1)–Cu(1)–O(1w)
N(5)–Cu(1)–O(1w)
Cu(1)–O(1)–Cu(2)
1.924(4)
2.037(4)
1.982(3)
1.983(4)
2.330(4)
2.753(5)
86.0(2)
91.4(2)
167.0(2)
95.8(2)
176.5(2)
103.4(2)
94.1(2)
78.8(2)
88.6(2)
Cu(2)–N(3)
Cu(2)–N(4)
Cu(2)–O(1)
Cu(2)–N(5)
Cu(2)–O(2w)
Cu(2)–O(4)
N(3)–Cu(2)–N(4)
N(3)–Cu(2)–O(1)
N(3)–Cu(2)–N(5)
N(3)–Cu(2)–O(2w)
N(4)–Cu(2)–O(1)
N(4)–Cu(2)–N(5)
N(4)–Cu(2)–O(2w)
O(1)–Cu(2)–N(5)
O(1)–Cu(2)–O(2w)
N(5)–Cu(2)–O(2w)
Cu(1)–N(5)–Cu(2)
1.916(5)
2.028(4)
1.960(3)
1.998(5)
2.337(5)
2.979(6)
86.0(2)
91.6(2)
169.2(2)
96.4(2)
168.5(2)
102.3(2)
96.3(2)
78.9(2)
95.1(2)
The single crystal of complex 1 was mounted on a glass fiber
and coated with epoxy resin. Intensities data were collected at
room temperature on a Nonius DIP-1030H system with Mo K
a
radiation (k = 0.71073 Å). Maximum diffraction angle theta was
24.7° (completeness of 96%) due to poor diffracting crystals. Cell
refinement, indexing and scaling of the data sets were carried
out using Denzo and Scalepack [25]. The structure was solved by
direct methods and subsequent Fourier analyses [26] and refined
by the full-matrix least-squares method based on F2 with all
observed reflections using SHELX-97 [26] software. The non-hydro-
gen atoms were refined anisotropically. All calculations were car-
ried out using WINGX System version 1.80.05 [27].
92.5(2)
101.8(2)
89.5(2)
100.5(2)
The CCDC number of the complex is 1033058. Pertinent crystal-
lographic data and refinement details are summarized in Table 1.