signal ratios of 0.4-1.0% are typical for unlabeled retinol. This
phenomenon has been documented with several linear-beam
single-quadrupole instruments and has been attributed to ion-
molecule reactions occurring in the mass spectrometer ion
source.8,9
It was our hypothesis that by sweeping out nontarget mol-
ecules from the ionization chamber using a complex broad-band
wave form, ion-molecule reactions would be minimized and
undesirable chemical noise eliminated. This reduction in noise
would expand the analytic range of the method to isotopic
enrichment levels lower than those previously obtainable on linear-
beam instruments. We applied this technique to measure retinol-
d4/ retinol ratios in human plasma from an individual administered
an oral dose of 30 mg of â-carotene-d8.
While many studies employing labeled vitamin A and â-caro-
tene tracers have used pharmacological doses of retinyl-d4 acetate
13
(20-45 mg),8-11 [8,9,19- C]retinyl palmitate (55 mg),12 or â-carotene-
d8 (30-120 mg),6,7,13 smaller doses more typical of daily dietary
intake are desirable for quantitating rate processes and evaluating
nutritional status by isotope dilution techniques; physiological-
sized doses will minimize perturbations of endogenous retinoid
and carotenoid pools and limit departure from steady-state kinetics
during the metabolic course of the tracer. Furthermore, admin-
istration of smaller doses reduces experimental costs and improves
the feasibility of epidemiological studies of larger populations.
Smaller doses, however, require increased instrument dynamic
range and precision at lower enrichments. The modeling of
â-carotene is further complicated by a low rate of bioconversion
where as little as one-sixth of a â-carotene dose is converted to
retinol when taken orally.14
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Chemicals. trans-â-Carotene-10,10′,19,19,19,19′,19′,19′-d8 (â-
carotene-d8) and retinyl-10,19,19,19-d4 acetate were purchased from
Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Woburn, MA). Isotopic purity
for the deuterated retinol was 83% retinol-d4, 17% retinol-d3;
â-carotene-d8 was 80% â-carotene-d8, 16% â-carotene-d7, and 4%
â-carotene-d6. N-Methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoracetamide
(MTBSTFA) was purchased from Regis (Morton Grove, IL) in
glass ampules.
Sample P reparation. Serial blood specimens were drawn
over a 16-day period from a healthy 22-year-old female volunteer
(55 kg) who ingested 30 mg of â-carotene-d8 followed by a low
carotenoid breakfast consisting of a bagel with cream cheese and
a glass of low fat milk. Blood was collected in glass tubes
containing K3EDTA and the plasma separated by centrifugation
and stored at -20 °C prior to analysis. Retinol isotopomers were
extracted using a single-column solid-phase extraction (SPE)
method previously described,7 converted to their tert-butyldi-
methylsilyl ethers (tBDMS-retinol and -retinol-d4) with MTBSTFA,8
and stored at -20 °C until analysis by GC/ MS.
GC/ MS Conditions. The GC/ MS experiments were carried
out using a Varian Saturn 4D quadrupole ion trap mass spectrom-
eter (Varian Associates, Walnut Creek, CA) running Saturn
Revision 5.2 software. SIS experiments were created using SIS
Version 1.0 software. The system was equipped with a Varian
Star 3400CX gas chromatograph and a 1078 universal capillary
injector. The GC was fitted with a DB-23 column (50% cyanopro-
pylpoly(dimethylsiloxane); J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA) 15 m in
length, with an internal diameter of 0.25 mm and a phase thickness
of 0.15 µm. A helium head pressure of 12 psi was used; the carrier
gas also acted as the buffer gas within the ion trap. The injector
and MS transfer line were maintained at 250 °C. The GC oven
temperature was 140 °C (initial hold 1 min), then 25 °C/ min to
195 °C, then 12 °C/ min to 218 °C, and then 25 °C/ min to 255 °C
(final hold 2 min). The ion trap manifold was held at 200 °C.
The molecular masses of tBDMS-retinol and -retinol-d4 are 400
and 404 D, respectively. Analyses were performed using electron
impact ionization in the SIS mode to store ions between m/ z 390
and 420. The voltage adjustment factor (VAF) was set at 175%.
This factor controls the amplitude of the applied rf (radio
frequency) wave form. The manufacturer does not document the
actual value of the voltage controlled by this factor. The
background mass was set to m/ z 48 during the SIS experiments;
this corresponds to a qz value of ∼0.11 for the molecular ions.
Spectra were recorded using an m/ z range of 240-420 using the
AGC feature and an ion current target value set at 8000.
Instrument Calibration. The normal physiological concen-
tration of retinol ranges from 1 to 1.5 µM (286-429 ng/ mL) in
The search for improved precision at low enrichments led to
our examination of ion trap mass spectrometry (ITMS). Ion trap
mass spectrometers have the ability to selectively accumulate ions
and then eject them in a rapid burst to a detector. This
concentrating effect creates higher effective concentrations seen
by the detector, leading to high sensitivity. Traditionally, they
have had a limited dynamic range because of the requirement
that total ion density in the trap does not exceed ∼105 ions.15-17
Without other developments, ITMS instrumentation would prob-
ably not offer many advantages over linear-beam instruments for
retinol isotopomer analyses. However, two developments, the
selected ion storage (SIS) scan functions and automatic gain
control (AGC) have significantly improved the versatility of these
instruments for quantitative analysis.17,18 The SIS scan function
enables the selective storage and/ or ejection of single ion species
using multifrequency wave forms. This feature can increase
instrument sensitivity through the removal of unwanted ions from
the sample matrix and column bleed (gas chromatography
applications). Automatic gain control prevents the buildup of
excessive space charge by maintaining the correct number of ions
in the trap through the adjustment of ionization time, leading to
a greatly improved dynamic range.
(10) Haskell, M. J.; Handelman, G. J.; Peerson, J. M.; Jones, A. J.; Rabbi, M. A.;
Awal, M. A.; Wahed, M. A.; Mahalanabis, D.; Brown, K. H. Am. J. Clin.
Nutr. 1 9 9 7 , 66, 67-74.
(11) Furr, H. C.; Amedee-Manesme, O.; Clifford, A. J.; Bergen, H. R.; Jones, A.
D.; Anderson, D. P.; Olson, J. A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1 9 8 9 , 49, 713-6.
(12) Reinersdorff, D. v.; Bush, E.; Leverato, D. J. J. Lipid Res. 1 9 9 6 , 37, 1875-
85.
(13) Tang, G.; Andrien, B.; Dolnikowski, G. FASEB J. 1 9 9 6 , 10, 3 (Astract 1386).
(14) World Health Organization. Handbook on Human Nutritional Requirements;
WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1974; No. 61, p 66.
(15) March, R. E.; Hughes, R. J. Quadrupole Storage Mass Spectrometry; Chemical
Analysis Series 102; Wiley: New York, 1989.
(16) March, R. E., Todd, J. F. J., Eds. Practical Aspects of Ion Trap Mass
Spectrometry; CRC Press: New York, 1996; Vol. I-III.
(17) Stafford, G. C.; Taylor, D. M.; Bradshaw, S. C.; Syka, S. C. 35th ASMS
Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Denver, CO, 1987; p
775-6.
(18) Buttrill, S. E., Jr.; Shaffer, B.; Karnicky, J.; Arnold, J. T. 40th ASMS
Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Washington, DC, 1992;
p 1015-6.
1370 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 70, No. 7, April 1, 1998