Scheme 4
ing acyloin derivatives 2a-j and 3a-c were obtained in high
afforded (R)-2a, (R)-3a, and (S)-benzoin in optically pure
form after separation of the products by column chroma-
tography (Scheme 4). To obtain full conversion of (R)-
benzoin into (R)-HPP derivatives, methoxy and dimethoxy
acetaldehydes have to be used in excess and should be added
to the reaction mixture at fixed time intervals. Some
representative examples of the synthesis of benzoins are
shown in Table 2.
enantiomeric excess, as summarized in Table 1. The optical
purity of the products was determined using HPLC with a
chiral column, and the data were compared with those from
racemic products synthesized either using classical chemical
4a
synthesis methodology or by racemization of chiral com-
9
pounds. Since HPP generated through wild-type BAL-
catalyzed reaction is of (R)-configuration, we assumed that
HPP derivatives also possess (R)-configuration. To determine
the absolute configurations of the products, (R)-2-hydroxy-
3
-methoxy-1-phenylpropan-1-one (2a) was converted chemi-
Table 2. Synthetic (S)-Benzoins and (R)-2-HPP Derivatives
5
cally to the known (R)-2,3-dihydroxy-1-phenylpropan-1-one
by means of a selective cleavage of ether functionality.
1
0
(S)-4a -e
(R)-2
yield (%)a
rac 4
Ar
yield (%)a
ee (%)b
ee (%)b
As shown in Table 1, BAL is able to bind a broad range
of different aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes to C2-
ThDP prior to ligation. The yield of the reaction depends
on the structure of the aldehyde. Fluorine substitution on
the 3,5- and 2,4-positions of the phenyl ring decreased the
yield of the reaction. Pyridine carbaldehyde also furnished
a low yield, but furfural and o-methoxy benzaldehyde gave
the products in high yields. The steric and electronic demand
of the substituent putatively plays a decisive role in the
conversion rate.
>98c
>98f
93
94f
96f
92g
a
b
c
d
e
ph
47
44
46
39
48
>98c
38.5
45.5
45
f
2,4-F2C6H3
4-MeOC6H4
2-MeOC6H4
2-furanyl
d
>98
>98
e
c
45.5
92
44
a
Acetaldehyde derivatives were used in excess amounts, and yields are
b
based on benzoin. Ee value is measured immediately after workup.
c
Chiralpak AD, UV detection at 254 nm, 90:10 hexane/2-propanol, flow
0.8 mL/min. d Chiralpak AD, UV detection at 254 nm, 75:25 hexane/2-
propanol, flow 0.95 mL/min. e Chiralpak AD, UV detection at 254 nm, 98:2
f
hexane/2-propanol, flow 0.90 mL/min. Chiralcel OD column, UV detection
8
at 254 nm, 95:5 hexane/2-propanol, flow 0.6 mL/min. g Chiralcel OD
column, UV detection at 254 nm, 90:10 hexane/2-propanol, flow 0.5 mL/
min.
In our previous communications, we showed that BAL
is also able to accept benzoin as a substrate to catalyze C-C
bond cleavage followed by carboligation in the presence of
acetaldehyde (Scheme 2). Accordingly, (R)-benzoin was
reacted with BAL in the presence of methoxy and dimethoxy
acetaldehyde; the reaction was monitored by HPLC. Addition
of the corresponding acetaldehyde derivative resulted in the
formation of (R)-2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-1-phenylpropan-1-
one (2a) and (R)-2-hydroxy-3,3-dimethoxy-1-phenylpropan-
The results presented here are in accord with the mecha-
nistic investigation of other ThDP-dependent enzymes. Since
structural information about BAL is still lacking, a structure-
based discussion of the observed stereocontrol is not yet
possible.
1
-one (3a) in high yields and almost optically pure form
The method described herein presents the first enzyme-
catalyzed highly enantioselective synthesis of (R)-2-hydroxy-
(Scheme 4). As anticipated, the same reaction starting from
(S)-benzoin failed. Repeating this reaction with rac-benzoin
3
-methoxy-1-arylpropan-1-one and (R)-2-hydroxy-3,3-di-
methoxy-1-arylpropan-1-one via acyloin linkage. The reac-
tion works in organic-aqueous medium, overcomes the
solubility problem with organic substrates, and paves the way
for large-scale preparation. The products are obtained in high
yields starting from simple, easily available aromatic alde-
hydes, benzoins, and methoxy and dimethoxy acetaldehyde
via C-C bond cleavage and carboligation reactions. This
(
8) (a) Demir, A. S.; Pohl, M.; Janzen, E.; M u¨ ller, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 633. (b) Demir, A. S.; Sesenoglu, O.; Eren, E.; Hosrik,
B.; Pohl, M.; Janzen, E.; Kolter, D.; Feldmann, R.; D u¨ nkelmann, P.; M u¨ ller,
M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 96. (c) D u¨ nkelmann, P.; Kolter-Jung, D.;
Nitsche, A.; Demir, A. S.; Siegert, P.; Lingen, B.; Baumann, M.; Pohl, M.;
M u¨ ller, M. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12084. (d) Pohl, M.; Lingen, B.;
Muller, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 5289. (e) Iding, H.; D u¨ nnwald, T.;
Greiner, L.; Liese, A.; M u¨ ller, M.; Siegert, P.; Gr o¨ tzinger, J.; Demir, A.
S.; Pohl, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1483.
(
9) Demir, A. S.; Hamamci, H.; Sesenoglu, O.; Neslihanoglu, R.;
Asikoglu, B.; Capanoglu, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 6447.
10) (a) Seetharamiah, A. J. Chem. Soc. 1948, 894. (b) Nagaoka, M.;
Kunitama, Y.; Numazawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 334.
11) Tamura, Y.; Yakura, T.; Terashi, H.; Haruta, J.-I.; Kita, Y. Chem.
(12) Kochetkov, N. K.; Nifant’ev, E. E. J. Gen. Chem. 1960, 30, 1848.
(13) (a) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Teles, J. H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996, 79,
1217. (b) Enders, D.; Kallfass, U. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1743.
(14) Clecak, N. J.; Cox, R. J. (Int. Business Machines Corp.) U.S. Patent
3499763, 1970; Chem. Abstr. 1970, 73, 89166.
(
(
Pharm. Bull. 1987, 35, 570.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 12, 2003
2049