8536 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 23, 1999
Li et al.
Compounds were identified in GC-MS runs by comparison
of the silylated sample retention times and fragmentation
patterns with those of silylated authentic compounds. The
compounds that correspond to peaks 5, 11, 14, 19, 20, 22, 31,
32, and 34 were prepared as previously reported.39
P ea k 16. The identity of 3,4-dihydroxybutyric acid was
confirmed by comparison to the reported mass spectrum of the
silylated derivative.74
P ea k 21. This compound has three acids and/or alcohols.
A formula of C5H7ClO4 is obtained. The parent has two
aldehydes and/or ketone and four unsaturations; the derivative
has two unsaturations. The assignment is made partly in
analogy to peak 19 of Table 1 in our previous work.39 On the
basis of its appearance on degradation of 7 and particularly
10, 3-chloro-4,5-dihydroxy-2-pentenoic acid is the most likely
structure.
P ea k 25. This compound is identical to peak 23 in Table 1
of our previous work.39 It was assigned on the basis of having
a mass spectrum identical to silylated cis-4-hydroxy-2-pen-
tenoic acid but a different retention time.
P ea k 26. This compound has three acids and/or alcohols.
A formula of C5H5ClO5 is obtained. The parent has one
aldehyde or ketone and four unsaturations, and the derivative
has three unsaturations. Both 2- and 3-chloro-2-pentenedioic
acid are possible, but the 3-chloro isomer is chosen because of
the appearance from degradation of 10. The two peaks are
presumed to be due to E/Z isomerization.
P ea k 29. This compound is an isomer of peak 26. 2-Chloro-
4-hydroxy-2-pentenedioic acid is proposed on the basis of the
fact that it does not appear on degradation of 10.
P ea k 35. This compound has four acids and/or alcohols and
a formula of C6H9ClO5. The parent has two aldehydes and/or
ketones and four unsaturations. The derivative has two
unsaturations. The proposed structure is a straightforward
degradation product of 6 (Scheme 4).39 The two peaks are
consistent with the two diastereomers of the alcohols but are
also consistent with alkene stereoisomers.
P ea k 36. This compound has four acids and/or alcohols. It
is not reduced by NaBH4 and has a formula of C6H7ClO6. It
has three unsaturations and is a simple derivative of 3-chlo-
romuconic acid. Dihydroxylation of fumaric acid and related
compounds was observed previously.39 The two diastereomers
are again consistent with the hydroxyl groups.
P ea k 37. This compound was only observed on photocata-
lytic degradation of 3. The mass of the silylated compound is
402. The large peak at 285 (i.e., loss of 117) is usually
correlated with a CO2TMS group. Both 402 and 285 contain a
single Cl atom, as indicated by the isotope pattern. This
compound is not reduced by NaBH4. Several possible formulas
can be written; perhaps the most reasonable is C10H5O6Cl-
(TMS)2, corresponding to C10H7O6Cl in the parent. If the
reaction mixture from degradation of 3 is worked up by
reduction of the aqueous volume and ether extraction, followed
by direct analysis, only two GC-MS peaks are observed. They
correspond to 3 and a compound with the following MS: 220-
(30), 205(100), and 177(25). This ether extract can be silylated
to produce a mixture whose principal components are silylated
3 and peak 37. To the extent that the correlation can be made
between peak 37 and the 220-mass (unsilylated) peak, there
is an upper limit of two TMS groups on peak 37. With this
assumption, peak 37 must be a compound with more than six
carbons and thus an adduct between 3 and some other
compound. This is consistent with peak 37 not being observed
in any of the other degradations analyzed by GC-MS reported
in this paper.
The following compounds were prepared by literature
methods: 4-chlorocatechol, 3;68 2-chloro-3-hydroxypropionic
1
acid (peak 7);69 chloromaleic acid (peak 13),70 mp 107 °C, H
NMR (acetone-d6): δ 6.52, 13C NMR: δ 164.4, 163.7, 137.8,
and 124.8; chlorofumaric acid (peak 17),70 mp 192-193 °C, 1H
NMR (acetone-d6): δ 7.27, 13C NMR: δ 164.5, 162.8, 134.2,
and 128.7; (E,E)-3-chloromuconic acid (peak 27);59,60,71 4-chlo-
ropyrogallol (peak 30),72 mp 163-164 °C, 1H NMR (acetone-
d6): δ 6.68 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 6.42 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 1 H), 13C
NMR δ 145.7, 143.2, 135.1, 120.1, 112.4, 108.3.
P ea k 28. (E)-3-Ch lor o-4-oxoh ex-2-en ed ioic Acid . A so-
lution of HOAc (5 mL), HOOAc (32%, 2.52 mL, 12 mmol), and
ferric acetate (1 mg) was stirred at room temperature. To this
was added dropwise a solution of 5-chloro-1,2,4-benzenetriol
(0.60 g, 3.7 mmol) dissolved in HOAc (10 mL) at approximately
1 drop per minute. After an additional 1 h, the reaction was
concentrated under vacuum to give a dark residue (0.5 g).
NMR analysis of the concentrated oil showed that (E)-3-chloro-
4-oxohex-2-enedioic acid was the major component (>60%) of
a mixture. Attempts to purify the compound by chromatogra-
phy were not fruitful. Tituration of the mixture with acetone
or chloroform confirmed the assignment of the 1H NMR by
changing identities and ratios of impurities but also did not
result in pure material. In CDCl3, the closed form, i.e.,
(3-chloro-2-hydroxy-5-oxo-2,5-dihydrofuran-2-yl)-acetic acid,
predominates, whereas in acetone, the equilibrium favors the
open form. 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 6.24 (s, 1 H), 3.21 (d, J ) 16.5
1
Hz, 1 H), 2.83 (d, J ) 16.5 Hz, 1 H). H NMR (acetone-d6): δ
6.41 (s, 1 H), 3.12 (s, 2 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz): δ 169.3, 167.5,
158.9, 120.2, 104.8 and 39.8.
P ea k 33. 5-Ch lor o-1,2,4-ben zen etr iol (6).73 1,2,4-Ben-
zenetriol (1.0 g, 7.9 mmol) was dissolved in dry ether (50 mL)
in an ice bath. Sulfuryl chloride (1.1 g, 8.1 mmol) was added
dropwise. The reaction was stirred in an ice bath for 24 h and
then refluxed for 3 h. A black residue (1.2 g) was obtained on
removal of solvent. The crude material was sublimed at 80-
90 °C at 0.2 Torr, and the sublimate was recrystalized in
benzene to give light brown crystals (0.82 g, yield 65%), mp
1
117 °C (d). H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.87 ppm (s, 1 H),
6.61 (s, 1 H), 5.12 (two close singlets, 2 H, exchanges with D2O),
and 4.70 (s, 1 H, exchanges with D2O). 13C NMR (75 MHz): δ
147.0, 145.9, 139.6, 116.8, 110.1, and 105.0.
Com p ou n d s Ten ta tively Id en tified on th e Ba sis of MS
P a tter n . The mass spectra, along with reasonable constraints
based on the starting materials, generally give unique molec-
ular formulas. The number of TMS groups is readily deter-
mined from the molecular weight and certain fragments. It
corresponds to the total number of alcohol and acid sites in
the unsilylated compound. If the compound is a reduction
product, the number of aldehyde and ketone groups in the
parent is given by the additional molecular weight when
NaBD4 is used. The names used below refer to the unsilylated
compounds, just as in Table 2.
Ack n ow led gm en t. The NSF is gratefully acknowl-
edged for support of this work in the form of a CAREER
Award.
(67) DeGussa. DeGussa Technol. Bull. 1984, 56, 8.
(68) Willstatter, R.; Mu¨ller, H. E. Chem. Ber. 1911, 44, 2182-2191.
(69) Roush, W. R.; Brown, B. B. J . Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3380-3387.
(70) Perkin, W. H. J . Chem. Soc. 1888, 53, 695-713.
(71) Pandell, A. J . J . Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3908-3912.
(72) Horner, L.; Gowecke, S. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 1267-1276.
(73) J oshi, D. K.; Gold, M. H. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59,
1779-1785.
Su p p or tin g In for m a tion Ava ila ble: Copies of proton
NMR spectra from the preparation of authentics samples for
peak 28 in acetone and chloroform. This material is available
(74) Esterbauer, H.; Schubert, J .; Sanders, E. B.; Sweeley, C. C. Z.
Naturforsch. B. 1977, 32, 315-320.
J O990912N