ORGANIC
LETTERS
2
006
Vol. 8, No. 20
545-4548
Stereoselective Epoxidation of
-Deoxypentenosides: A Polarized-
Model
4
4
π
Gang Cheng, Fabien P. Boulineau, Siong-Tern Liew, Qicun Shi,
Paul G. Wenthold, and Alexander Wei*
Department of Chemistry, Purdue UniVersity, 560 OVal DriVe,
West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2084
Received July 15, 2006
ABSTRACT
The high facioselectivity in the epoxidation of 4-deoxypentenosides (4-DPs) by dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) correlates with a stereoelectronic
bias in the 4-DPs’ ground-state conformations, as elucidated by polarized- frontier molecular orbital (PPFMO) analysis.
π
4
-Deoxypentenosides (4-DPs) are unsaturated pyranoside
stereocenters (1-4) or transannular substituents with different
electronic character (5-8, 10) and cannot be simply ex-
plained by previously established stereodirecting effects.5
The epoxidations of R-methyl 4-DPs 1, 5, and 7 proceed
syn rather than anti with respect to the C3 stereocenter, which
precludes the allylic oxygen from being the dominant
derivatives with structural homology to glycals but bear
heteroatomic substituents at the anomeric position rather than
carbon. Studies from our laboratory have shown that 4-DPs
and glycals have similar reactivity profiles, with intriguing
-7
1
ramifications for carbohydrate and natural product synthesis.
8
For example, the 4-DP derived from R-methyl glucoside (R-
Glc-4-DP, 1) can be epoxidized stereoselectively at low
temperatures by dimethyldioxirane (DMDO), followed by
nucleophilic additions to produce pyranosides with rare or
unnatural configurations.2
director. The direct involvement of local steric effects is
also unlikely: for instance, in the ground-state conformation
of â-methyl 4-DP 2, both density functional theory (DFT)
9
calculations and NMR coupling constant analysis suggest
Additional DMDO oxidation studies involving 4-DPs
derived from the methyl glycosides of glucose, mannose,
and glucosamine (2-10) reveal a striking trend with respect
(4) The anticipated â-epoxide from 2-dibenzylamino-4-DP derivative 9
could not be isolated presumably due to its cross reactivity with the C2
dibenzylamino group, although the R-epoxide derived from 10 was stable
upon isolation.
(5) (a) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of
Organic Compounds; Wiley: New York, 1994. (b) Franck, R. W. In
Conformational BehaVior of Six-Membered Rings; Juaristi, E., Ed.; VCH
Publishers: Weinheim, 1995; pp 159-200.
(6) (a) Houk, K. N.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Rondan, N. G.; Wu, Y.-D.;
Brown, F. K.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Metz, J. T.; Li, Y.; Loncharich, R. J.
Science 1986, 231, 1108-1117. (b) Martinelli, M. J.; Peterson, B. C.; Khau,
V. V.; Hutchison, D. R.; Leanna, M. R.; Audia, J. E.; Droste, J. J.; Wu,
Y.-D.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 2204-2210.
(7) Washington, I.; Houk, K. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4485-
4488.
(8) In comparing these results with earlier reports on the DMDO
oxidation of glycals, we note that a gulal derivative (stereoanalogue of 1)
produced a 1:1 mixture of stereoisomers at 0 °C: Halcomb, R. L.;
Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 6661-6666.
3
to stereochemical outcome (see Table 1). The facioselective
epoxidation proceeds anti to two of the three substituents
on the 4-DP reactant, producing epoxyacetals in essentially
4
quantitative yield in nearly all cases. This empirical “major-
ity rule” is independent of the relationship among contiguous
(
1) (a) Tolstikov, A. G.; Tolstikov, G. A. Russ. Chem. ReV. 1993, 62,
79-601. (b) Ferrier, R. J.; Hoberg, J. O. In AdV. Carbohydr. Chem.
Biochem.; Horton, D., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 2003; Vol. 58, pp
5-119.
2) (a) Boulineau, F. P.; Wei, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2281-2283. (b)
Boulineau, F. P.; Wei, A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3391-3399.
3) The synthesis of compounds 5-10 will be reported elsewhere.
5
5
(
(
1
0.1021/ol0617401 CCC: $33.50
© 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/30/2006