A R T I C L E S
Lihs and Caudle
simple aliphatic carbamates, C-N bond rotation has the effect
of localizing the lone pair onto the nitrogen atom to a greater
degree, making the nitrogen atom more nucleophilic and thus
subject to protonation and decarboxylation. Indeed, such zwit-
terionic species are believed to be important in the acid-
K (1 + x) - (K (1 + x) - 4(K - 1)K x)
H
x
H
H
H
kobs ) k2
(5)
[
]
2
(K - 1)
H
Equation 5 results in saturation behavior for kobs since the
expression in the brackets increases from 0 to 1 as [HA]o
increases. Equation 5 was fit to the data in Figure 7 to obtain
20
dependent decarboxylation of simple aliphatic carbamates.
1
However, the nitrogen lone pair in N -carboxybiotin is still partly
-
1
a value for the terminal rate constant k2 ) 23(2) min , which
is the rate constant for unimolecular elimination of CO2 from
H2. Assuming that this value is the same whether proton transfer
occurs from acetic or benzoic acid, the slower rates for acetic
acid dependent decarboxylation result from a smaller KH value
for acetic acid (KH ) 0.022(5) M ) versus benzoic acid (KH
15(4) M ). This is in turn consistent with the higher pKa
for acetic acid compared with benzoic acid in DMSO.
delocalized into the carbonyl group even when the carboxyl
group is orthogonal to the ureido ring. Thus, loss of N-CO2
-
1
double bond character in 2 or N -carboxybiotin may not make
the nitrogen appreciably more nucleophilic. This might explain
-
why carboxyl exchange of 2 is several orders of magnitude
-
1
slower than for the simple aliphatic carbamates such as lithium
diethylcarbamate, which has a CO2 exchange rate constant of
-
1
)
1
7
-
1
21
at least 50 min under the same conditions, Figure S1. The
The CO2 exchange experiments and the acid-dependent
decarboxylation together suggest two pathways for elimination
1
-
rate for CO2 elimination from N -carboxybiotin and 2 is slowed
since the nitrogen lone pair is not as available for protonation
as in a simple alkylcarbamate.
-
1
of CO2 from 2 and, by inference, from N -carboxybiotin. An
acid-independent pathway is operative in the uncatalyzed
carboxyl exchange experiments and a more rapid acid-dependent
pathway is operative in acid-dependent decarboxylation. The
rate for elimination of CO2 from H2 is almost 3 orders of
Inasmuch as rapid carboxyl exchange would facilitate car-
boxyl transfer in the carboxylase enzymes, it is counterintuitive
that the biochemical cofactor eliminates CO so much more
2
-
magnitude more rapid than from 2 . This is consistent with the
slowly than simple aliphatic carbamates, which could be
biosynthesized from much simpler precursors. Indeed, at least
1
general stability of N -carboxybiotin and N-carboxyimidazoli-
done at neutral and higher pH and suggests that CO2 release
could then be controlled by the enzymatic system to occur only
in the carboxyl transferase active site by enzyme-facilitated
three enzymes employ N-carboxylation of the amino side chain
of a lysine residue to generate a carbamate group for the purpose
22-24
of coordinating a metal ion.
These carbamates are prepared
1
catalysis or proton transfer to N -carboxybiotin.
from a readily available endogenous protein residue and would
Comparing Scheme 3b and 3c, we see that the proposed
mechanisms for the magnesium-catalyzed carboxyl exchange
and the acid-dependent decarboxylation are chemically similar.
In both cases, a Lewis acid coordinates to the carbonyl oxygen.
The predicted effect is to polarize the C-N double bond away
from the carboxyl group and more toward the carbonyl group.
1
appear to be kinetically more reactive than N -carboxybiotin.
However, the organization of the BDC enzymes into two
1
independent active sites coupled only by N -carboxybiotin led
to the hypothesis that the two subunits may have originally
2,8
evolved as separate enzymes. In this case, a carboxyl transfer
reagent would be required that was sufficiently stable to
decarboxylation to freely diffuse between two isolated proteins.
There would then be a chemical advantage to having a carboxyl
carrier that was more stable to dissociation but whose CO2
elimination could be triggered, for example, by interaction with
a Lewis acid or by proton transfer. This stability can also serve
-
This would weaken the N-CO2 bond and thereby facilitate
dissociation of CO2. Thus, Scheme 3b and 3c are similar up
through the point of CO2 dissociation. However, in Scheme 3c
CO2 dissociation is irreversible because of the very large forward
driving force resulting from the tautomerization equilibrium that
strongly favors the formation of 1. While 1† should be reactive
toward CO2,18 tautomerization (i.e., migration of the proton from
O to N) competes with carboxylation, thereby preventing reentry
1
to minimize abortive decarboxylation prior to N -carboxybiotin
translocation and substrate binding. Our chemical studies lend
some support to this idea by showing that unimolecular
elimination of CO2 from the N-carboxyimidazolidone functional
group is slow but can be catalyzed by noncovalent interactions
with the ureido headgroup. Indeed, a kinetic analysis of the
carboxyltransferase subunit of acetyl-CoA carboxylase has
identified one or more ionizable residues in the active site that
+
of CO2. The more ionic interactions in Mg3 mean that even if
migration of Mg2 from O to N occurs, Mg3 remains reactive
+
+
toward CO2. As a result, magnesium ion catalyzes reversible
CO2 dissociation instead of decarboxylation. The Mg2+ and acid-
dependent experiments therefore show that the rate for unimo-
lecular CO2 exchange can be tuned by influencing specific
interactions with the ureido ring, which is an important step
toward understanding how CO2 elimination might be triggered
in biotin enzymes.
It has also been suggested that decarboxylation of N1-
carboxybiotin involves rotation of the carbamyl group out of
planarity,19 which might result if the N-CO2- double bond
(
20) Johnson, S. L.; Morrison, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1323-1334.
Ewing, S. P.; Lockshon, D.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
3072.
(21) Deposited in Supporting Information
(
22) Rubisco: Schreuder, H. A.; Knight, S.; Curmi, P. M. G.; Andersson, I.;
Cascio, D.; Sweet, R. M.; Branden, C. I.; Eisenberg, D. Protein Sci. 1993,
2, 1136-1146. Belknap, W. R.; Portis, A. R., Jr. Biochemistry 1986, 25,
1864-1869. Schreuder, H. A.; Knight, S.; Curmi, P. M. G.; Andersson, I.;
character is decreased by interactions between Lewis acidic sites
Cascio, D.; Br a¨ nden, C.-I.; Eisenberg, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1993, 90, 9968-9972. Cleland, W. W.; Andrews, T. J.; Gutteridge, S.;
Hartman, F. C.; Lorimer, G. H. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 549-561.
1
on the protein and the carbonyl group of N -carboxybiotin. In
(
23) Urease: Park, I.-L.; Carr, M. B.; Hausinger, R. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1994, 91, 3233-3237. Park, I.-L.; Hausinger, R. P. Science 1995,
267, 1156-1158. Pearson, M. A.; Schaller, R. A.; Michel, L. O.; Karplus,
P. A.; Hausinger, R. P. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 6214-6220.
(
(
(
17) Izutsu, K. Acid-base dissociation constants in dipolar aprotic solVents;
Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, U.K., 1990.
18) Hegarty, A. F.; Bruice, T. C.; Benkovic, S. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1969, 1173-1174.
(24) Zinc-dependent phosphotriesterase: Shim, H.; Raushel, F. M. Biochemistry
2000, 39, 7357-7364. Hong, S.-B.; Kuo, J. M.; Mullins, L. S.; Raushel,
F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7580-7581.
19) Thatcher, G. R. J.; Poirier, R.; Kluger, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
2
699-2704.
11340 J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 124, NO. 38, 2002