S. Bala et al.
Bioorganic Chemistry 115 (2021) 105185
M and 298.50 sec 1, respectively (Table S2).
ꢀ
3.6. Comparison of binding of inhibitors with H. Pylori MetAP1a
9
4.17 ± 6.8
μ
3
.4. Selective inhibition of Helicobacter pylori MetAP1a compared to its
To understand the structural basis for the selective inhibition of
H. pylori MetAP1a, we have developed the 3D model of the full-length
protein and compared it with the HsMetAP1b-7d and HsMetAP1b-7e5
structures. H. pylori MetAP1a and the human MetAP1b share 32.7%
identity with all-metal binding and gatekeeper histidines conserved. Of
the six residues that make up the S1 pocket, all three residues in the right
lobe are conserved (F198, C203, and W353 in humans and F64, C69, and
W223 in the H. pylori protein). However as seen in other proteins
described in Table 1, all residues in the left lobe are different in
HpMetAP1a (F58, L61, and P175) compared to the human counterpart
(P192, Y195, and F309). It is important to note that in 2,500 sequences
aligned with the human enzyme in the HSSP database as discussed
above, there was no sequence with leucine at Site 2 and proline in Site 3.
In the HsMetAP1b-7d and HsMetAP1b-7e5, methylene carbon of the
benzyl group in inhibitors makes a very short contact with the side chain
of the Y195 (3.4 Å). In the H. pylori MetAP1a, leucine being small and
branched could rotate away with ease without affecting the neighboring
residues thereby accommodating the inhibitor with better ease
compared to that in the human enzyme thus providing the structural
basis for selectivity (Fig. 5a and 5b). In this process, tryptophan (W223)
may not have to flip away from the active site which could be costly in
terms of energy.
human counterpart
The library of 17 compounds synthesized in this study were screened
for inhibition and determined their inhibition constants (Ki) against
pylori and human Type 1 MetAPs (Table 2). As we hypothesized from
the design, all 17 molecules inhibited the pylori enzyme with high
selectivity compared to the human enzyme. Of the eight 4-azaindole
substituted compounds, five showed inhibition better than 1 µM
against HpMetAP1a, while eight out of nine 5-azaindole substituted
compounds showed lower activity than 1 µM. The best compound in the
4
-substituted series (7c) showed 200-fold selective inhibition of pylori
enzyme compared to human MetAP1b. Among the 5-substituted series,
d4 showed 520 folds and 7g7 showed 400-fold selectivity against
7
HpMetAP1a. Among the substituents of the aromatic rings at the 1st
position on the azaindole, compounds with trifluoromethyl groups (7g
and 7g7) are better inhibitors with more than 100-fold selectivity.
Surprisingly, the best molecule with more than 500-fold selectivity has
no substitution on the aromatic ring (7d4). Compound 7i9 with two
fluorine atoms at position 2 and 4 though inhibit the HpMetAP1a at a
low concentration similar to 7j10, it also inhibits the human enzyme at
low concentration (Ki = 10.07 µM). Compound 7d inhibits the HpMe-
tAP1a at 0.53 µM and human MetAP1b at 11.05 µM. On the other hand,
homologous compound, 7d4 inhibits at 0.11 µM and 57.33 µM, pylori,
and human MetAPs respectively. Together, the structure activity rela-
tionship analysis suggests that azaindoles with hydroxamic acid at the
3.7. In-silico analysis for the binding of azaindole hydroxamic acid
derivatives on human Type 2 MetAP
4
th position and aromatic rings with halogen substitution at position 1
We have carried our docking studies to understand whether azain-
dole derivatives non-specifically target human Type 2 MetAP (MetAP2)
are better and selective inhibitors against HpMetAP1a (Table 2).
(
Fig. 6 and Fig. 7). The major interaction of metal chelating inhibitors is
3
.5. Crystal structure of inhibitors in complex with human enzyme
their ability to interact strongly with metal ions in the active site. The
active site of MetAP2 is having two histidine residues (H339, H231)
which might be helping the enzyme in specificity. These two histidine
residues are restricting the metal ion access for the bulky azaindole
molecules used in this study.
Several attempts to crystallize the HpMetAP1a were not successful.
To get a clue on the mode of binding, we have determined the crystal
structure of two inhibitors in complex with human enzyme using the
reported conditions (Table 3) [12]. Several inhibitors were soaked but
crystals in complex with compounds 7d (4-azaindole derivative) and
4. Conclusions
7
e5 (5-azaindole derivative) yielded the diffraction quality crystals. The
overall structure of inhibitor complexes is similar to the human holo-
structure (PDB ID: 2B3H) with less than 0.15 Å RMSD (all main chain
atoms). Except for W353 all other amino acids in the active site are
We have identified MetAP1a from Helicobacter pylori that have var-
iations within the S1 pocket, identified as left lobe compared to human
MetAP1b. Using these differences in the active site we have designed
and synthesized a library of 17 compounds that contain hydroxamic acid
moiety as a metal binding scaffold. All 17 compounds inhibited the
pylori enzyme with selectivity as high as 500 compared to the human
enzyme. The crystal structure of the human enzyme with two com-
pounds provided the molecular basis for selective inhibition.
◦
unaltered. Tryptophan side chain flips away by 180 to make space for
the aromatic ring of the inhibitor. In compound 7d, the hydroxamic acid
at 4th position of the azaindole moiety binds to the bimetalo center
placing the hydroxyl group between the two metal ions (Fig. 4a and 4b).
In the holo structure, a water molecule acts as a bridge between the two
metal ions that are believed to act as a nucleophile in hydrolyzing the
peptide substrates. The ketone in the hydroxamic acid replaces another
conserved water molecule and makes interactions with one of the metal
ions in the metal center (2.3 Å) while making two other hydrogen bonds
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial
interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence
the work reported in this paper.
(
T231 (3.4 Å) and a water molecule (2.9 Å)). The azaindole moiety
extends into the hydrophobic S1 pocket formed by Y195, F198, H212,
F309, and W253 (Fig. 4a and 4b). The benzyl group at N-1 pushes the
W353 away by flipping it compared to the native position. In the new
Acknowledgments
position, W353 makes edge- interaction (4.2 Å) with the inhibitor on
π
one side and partially solvent exposed on the other.
AA (EMR/2015/000461 and CRG/2019/006013) and RG (ECR/
2016/000288) thank Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB),
India for funding. RG acknowledges the lab facility at GITAM University.
SCB and BK acknowledge fellowship from DBT (Department of
Biotechnology), India. We acknowledge funding from DST (Department
of Science and Technology), India for the transport of our crystals and
data collection at Elettra Synchrotron. We thank Dr. Babu Manjashetty,
Beamline Scientist, Elettra Synchrotron for collecting data on our behalf.
The communication number issued by CSIR-IICT for this article is IICT/
Pubs./2021/021.
The overall conformation of the inhibitor in the HsMetAP1b-7e5 is
similar to that of 7d in HsMetAP1b-7d except for the orientation of the
carbonyl group in the hydroxamic moiety at the metal center (Fig. 4c
and Fig. 4d). In this structure, the carbonyl group flips out and makes
strong contact with H310 (2.6 Å). The rest of the molecule adopts a
similar conformation including the flipping of the W353 side chain.
1
2