3246 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 39, No. 15, 2000
Jarvis et al.
for any metathesis reaction.14 Reactions involving group 4
halides are typically predicted to reach the boiling point of the
salt produced in the reaction.25 In this case, the boiling point of
the byproduct salt, NaCl, is 1413 °C.26 This is very close to the
phase transition temperature reported for ZrP, which is 1425
°C. To see if the maximum reaction temperature causes the
formation of the cubic phase, NaCl was added to the system as
a heat sink. Results of the salt additions are shown in Figure 2.
Energy given off in the reaction now has to heat both the
products and the heat sink, thereby lowering the maximum
temperature reached in the reaction.14 Because there is now less
heat present to sinter the ZrP crystallites to larger sizes, the
ZrP X-ray peaks have broadened. Note, however, that the
product is still c-ZrP. Therefore, it can be concluded that the
maximum reaction temperature is not responsible for the
formation of the cubic phase.
Because cubic phase formation is not due to the maximum
temperature, phosphorus deficiency was investigated next. Irani
and Gingerich showed that their c-ZrP was relatively stable on
heating in the absence of phosphorus, but converted to h-ZrP
upon heating in the presence of phosphorus. This suggested that
ignition metathesis reactions might not allow for sufficient
diffusion of phosphorus to the zirconium resulting in cubic ZrP.
However, when 0.25 g of red phosphorus was added to a 0.5 g
ZrP ignition reaction, only c-ZrP was produced. Adding the extra
phosphorus should alleviate the problem of insufficient phos-
phorus diffusion in the reaction, if it exists. In the presence of
sufficient phosphorus the system still nucleates the high-
temperature cubic phase. It can be concluded that, although
phosphorus deficiency may be associated with c-ZrP, it is not
responsible for its formation in metathesis reactions.
then stirred together and ignited, approximately equal amounts
of c-HfP and h-HfP are observed in the product (Figure 4c).
However, if the starting materials are ground separately, then
ground vigorously together and ignited, the product is almost
exclusively c-HfP (Figure 4d). The explanation for these results
becomes clearer upon closer examination of the reactants before
ignition. An X-ray pattern taken of the reactants just after stirring
shows only peaks for HfCl4 and Na3P (Figure 4a). But the
pattern of the reactants ground together is different in two
obvious ways (Figure 4b). First, the diffraction peaks of the
reactants are greatly reduced in intensity if not altogether
eliminated. Second, two diffraction peaks emerge at ∼26° and
∼32° 2θ that can be assigned to the (111) and (200) lines of
NaCl. From these two observations it can be concluded that
the starting material lattices begin breaking down and the
product salt, NaCl, starts to form. The formation of NaCl during
the grinding stage lowers the amount of heat given off during
ignition by forming some product ahead of time. Less heat given
off with the ignition reaction means that the product is heated
less and quenched sooner. This is why more c-HfP is observed
and the diffraction peaks are broadened when the precursors
are ground separately and then ground vigorously together and
ignited.
The compound TiP has been predicted to undergo a hexagonal
to cubic transition at a lower temperature than ZrP (1425 °C)
does.7 This study does not support this prediction. Both ignition
and sealed tube metathesis reactions between TiI4 and Na3P form
only h-TiP. No evidence was found in any of the TiP reactions
that a phase transition takes place in this system. Additionally,
a reaction between TiCl3 and Na3P produced exclusively
hexagonal TiP, thereby ruling out a templating effect between
the byproduct salt NaCl and cubic TiP.
A third possibility is that the byproduct salt is assisting in
the crystallization of the cubic phase via templating. Because
there is only a 6.6% lattice mismatch between the lattice
parameters of the byproduct salt NaCl (a ) 5.64 Å)26 and the
product c-ZrP (a ) 5.27 Å)14 and the requirement for some
epitaxial growth is a mismatch of e15%, templating is a
possibility.27 When Li3P is substituted for Na3P to produce the
byproduct salt LiCl (a ) 5.14 Å),13 the result is still cubic ZrP;
this is consistent because the lattice mismatch is only 2.5%. To
further test the templating hypothesis, the salt KCl (a ) 6.29
Å)13 was added to the reaction. KCl has a 16% lattice mismatch
with c-ZrP and would therefore not be expected to assist in the
crystallization of the cubic phase. The reaction still yielded only
cubic ZrP. As a further test, hexagonal ZnS was added to the
ZrCl4/Na3P reaction. Hexagonal ZnS would certainly not be
expected to help form the cubic phase and might reasonably be
expected to assist in the formation of the hexagonal phase.
Interestingly, cubic ZrP was still the exclusive phosphide phase
and the crystallite size decreased to 290 Å as may be expected
for an inert additive. Hence, templating of the cubic phase can
be ruled out.
Conclusions
Solid-state metathesis reactions can be used to rapidly
synthesize metastable cubic phases of transition-metal phos-
phides. In contrast, sealed tube reactions between metal halides
and sodium phosphide, at 1000 °C, lead exclusively to the low-
temperature hexagonal phase. Salts were added to lower the
maximum reaction temperatures to check whether the high
temperatures reached in the rapid metathesis reactions were
responsible for cubic phase formation. The lower temperatures
produced by salt addition resulted in lower crystallinity, but still
produced only the cubic phase. Because phosphorus deficiency
can lead to cubic phases, excess phosphorus was added to the
ignited metathesis reactions; however, the result was still
exclusively the cubic phase. To test a possible templating effect,
compounds with lattice mismatches greater than the 6.6%
mismatch of NaCl were added to the metathesis reactions. The
addition of KCl with a 16% lattice mismatch still resulted in
cubic ZrP. Even the addition of hexagonal ZnS led only to cubic
ZrP formation, essentially ruling out a templating effect. Hence,
it appears most likely that the high-temperature cubic phases
of ZrP and HfP are nucleated first and then quenched rapidly
before the cubic phase can convert to the low-temperature
hexagonal phase.
It can be concluded that the high-temperature phases are most
likely nucleating first and retained due to the rapid quenching
of the system because neither maximum reaction temperature,
phosphorus deficiency, nor a templating effect is responsible
for cubic phase formation. Further evidence to support this
conclusion comes from the HfP system when the reaction
conditions are varied. If HfP and Na3P are ground separately,
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Professor John B.
Wiley, Dr. Philippe R. Bonneau, and Dr. Randolph E. Treece
for their insightful discussions regarding this work. This research
was funded by the National Science Foundation and the
University of California Campus Laboratory Collaboration
Program.
(26) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; West, R. C., Ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1985.
(27) West, A. R. Solid-State Chemistry and Its Applications; John Wiley
and Sons: New York, 1984.
IC000057M