C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
0.1% circularly polarized. It is somewhat surprising that the
measured dissymmetry factors for P-2 and M-2 are approximately
the same or even slightly less than that determined for 1. We had
anticipated that the increased helical overlap introduced by the
additional aromatic ring might lead to an increase in circular
polarization in the luminescence. It is well-known that interacting
independent chromophores exhibit maximum chirality when the
angle between the transition dipole directions is equal to 90°.
Although the additional aromatic ring in 2 increases the helical
twist, it must be the case that the net chirality is an inherently
complex function of the electronic structure of the twisted chro-
mophore. Previous studies on the CD of n-helicenes have also
shown that the prediction of net chirality of the observed transitions
is not a simple function of molecular geometry.9
It is important to compare the results presented here with previous
work by Phillips et al.6 In this study a 10-fold increase in the
luminescence dissymmetry ratio was observed (glum ) 0.01) for a
system of aggregating helicenes. However, the increased ordering
of these aggregates also results in a large degree of linear
polarization (P ) 0.39) which can greatly affect the CPL measure-
ment.10 In the measurements presented here, precautions have been
taken to ensure the complete removal of linearly polarized emission
in the direction of emission detection (see Supporting Information).
In summary, we have reported the first triarylamine-based
helicenes capable of preferentially absorbing and emitting circularly
polarized light. We believe that these systems are amenable to
device application, and we are thus pursuing derivatives of these
molecules to attain an increased CPL response that would allow
for the development of practical polarized organic light-emitting
diodes (POLEDs).
Figure 2. UV-vis electronic spectra of M-2 and P-2 in CHCl3. (A)
Absorption; (B) CD; (C) total luminescence; (D) CPL.
Acknowledgment. We thank Noah Tremblay for his contribu-
tions to the synthesis of these molecules, and Franc¸oise Muller for
assistance with the CPL measurements. D.V. gratefully acknowl-
edges the financial support of the National Science Foundation
CAREER Grant CHE-0134287, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and the
Camille and Henry Dreyfus New Faculty Award.
right circularly polarized light and ꢀ is defined as the average molar
absorptivity. Also plotted in Figures 1 and 2 are the total
luminescence spectrum (I) and the circularly polarized luminescence
spectra (∆I) for the diastereomers of 1 and 2. As expected, the
total emission spectra of M-1 and P-1 are virtually identical, as are
M-2 and P-2, and, therefore, only one is plotted. The emission
maximum occurs at 453 nm for helicene 1 and 478 nm for helicene
2.
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic procedures and
characterization data for all compounds, and experimental procedures
for the CPL measurements (PDF). This material is available free of
In analogy with eq 1, the degree of circularly polarized
luminescence is given by the luminescence dissymmetry ratio
References
IL - IR
(1/2)I (1/2)(IL + IR)
∆I
glum
)
)
(2)
(1) Riehl, J. P.; Richardson, F. S. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 1-15.
(2) (a) Dyreklev, P.; Berggren, M.; Ingana¨s, O.; Andersson, M. R.; Wenner-
stro¨m, O.; Hjertberg, T. AdV. Mater. 1995, 7, 43-45. (b) Grell, M.;
Bradley, D. C. AdV. Mater. 1999, 11, 895-905. (c) Grell, M.; Oda, M.;
Whitehead, K. S.; Asimakis, A.; Neher, D.; Bradley, D. D. C. AdV. Mater.
2001, 13, 577-580.
(3) Chen, S. H.; Katsis, D.; Schmid, A. W.; Mastrangelo, J. C.; Tsutsui, T.;
Blanton, T. N. Nature 1999, 397, 506-508 and references therein.
(4) (a) Feringa, B. L.; van Delden, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
3418-3438. (b) Sato, I.; Yamashima, R.; Kadowaki, K.; Yamamoto, J.;
Shibata, T.; Soai, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1096-1098.
(5) Peeters, E.; Christiaans, M. P. T.; Janssen, R. A. J.; Schoo, H. F. M.;
Dekkers, H. P. J. M.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9909-
9910.
(6) Phillips, K. E. S.; Katz, T. J.; Jockusch, S.; Lovinger, A. J.; Turro, N. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11899-11907.
(7) Field, J. E.; Hill, T. J.; Venkataraman, D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, ASAP.
(8) Thongpanchang, T.; Paruch, K.; Katz, T. J.; Rheingold, A. L.; Lam, K.-
C.; Liable-Sands, L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1850-1856.
(9) Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R.; Wachsmann, C.; Weber, E.; Sobanski, A.; Vo¨gtle,
F.; Grimme, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1717-1724.
(10) For reviews of CPL measurement techniques see (a) Maupin, C. L.; Riehl,
J. P., Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry; Lindon, J. C.,
Trantner, G. E., Holmes, J. L., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 1999;
pp 319-326. (b) Riehl, J. P.; Richardson, F. S. Methods Enzymol. 1993,
226, 539-553. (c) See ref 1.
where ∆I is the difference in the intensities of left and right
circularly polarized emissions and I is the total emission intensity.
In Figures 1 and 2, we plot ∆I at various wavelengths through the
luminescence transition. In Figure 1 each point is plotted with a
standard error bar, and in Figure 2 representative error bars are
given. The dashed lines in the CPL plot are presented to show the
luminescence spectral line shape. As can be seen in these figures,
for the same transition, gabs and glum have essentially the same value
for both helicenes. This is the result one expects in situations where
there is no significant geometry change upon population of the
emitting state. This is further corroborated by the small Stokes shifts
of the emission maxima. The dissymmetry factors at the peak
maxima for 1 and 2 are |0.001| and |0.0008|, respectively.
It should be noted that the results obtained show that even for
these very strained systems that the chiral discrimination in
absorption or the net circular polarization in emission is quite small.
A value of glum equal to 0.001 corresponds to light that is only
JA035626E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 39, 2003 11809