5774 Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 22, 2010
Hosokawa et al.
The phebox-Fe complex 2a is diamagnetic. The 1H NMR
spectrum of 2a exhibited two singlet signals at δ 1.42 (6H)
and 1.25 (6H), which were assigned to the methyl groups on
the oxazoline rings. Likewise, the AB doublet signals for the
oxazoline CH2 groups were observed at δ 4.43 (2H) and 4.39
(2H). These spectral features indicated that 2a has a Cs-
symmetric structure. In the IR spectrum of 2a, strong
absorptions were observed at 2020 and 1969 cm-1, which
were assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric CO stretch-
ing vibrations, respectively. The intensity ratio of these peaks
implied a cis arrangement of the CO ligands. The wavenum-
bers of these peaks are close to those of the related phebox-Ru
analogue (phebox)Ru(CO)2Br, (2037, 1959 cm-1).13
Reaction of the chiral isopropyl phebox precursor [(S,S)-
phebox-ip]Br(1b) withFe2(CO)9 at 50 °C for 3 h also produced
the chiral phebox-Fe complex 2b in 69% yield (eq 1). In
the 1H NMR spectrum of 2b, there are four doublet signals for
methyl protons of the isopropyl group at δ 0.43, 0.45, 0.49, and
0.83, due to the lack of symmetry elements in the molecule.
The molecular structure of 2a was determined by X-ray
analysis using crystals obtained from a CH3CN/CH2Cl2
solution.14 The ORTEP diagram shows pseudo-octahedral
geometry with the meridionally coordinated phebox ligand
Figure 1. ORTEP diagram of 2a at the 50% probability level.
Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond
lengths (A): Fe(1)-C(1) = 1.930(2), Fe(1)-C(17) = 1.792(2),
Fe(1)-C(18) = 1.839(2), Fe(1)-N(1) = 2.0122(17), Fe(1)-
N(2) = 2.0060(18), Fe(1)-Br(1) = 2.4924(5), C(17)-O(3) =
1.086(3), C(18)-O(4)=1.134(3). Selected angles (deg): N(1)-Fe-
(1)-N(2)=157.42(7), Br(1)-Fe(1)-C(17)=177.48(7), C(1)-Fe-
(1)-C(18)=175.82(9).
˚
˚
(Figure 1). The Fe-C1 bond length of 1.930(2) A is compa-
rable to that of [C6H3(CH2NMe2)2]FeCl2 (1.937(2) A).
2a
˚
This bond length of the phebox-Fe complex 2a is slightly
13
˚
shorter than that of the phebox-Ru complexes (1.96-2.00 A).
Similarly, the Fe-N bond lengths (2.0122(17) and 2.0060(18)
Asymmetric reduction of ketone is one of the most versa-
tile methods for preparation of optically active secondary
alcohols.16 In this context, the iron-catalyzed asymmetric
reduction of carbonyl compounds is thought to be a envi
ronmentally benign method.17,18 Next, we examined the
catalytic activity of the phebox-Fe complex in the hydro-
silylation of simple aromatic ketones. Initially, the phebox-Fe
complex 2b was subjected to hydrosilylation of 4-phenyla-
cetophenone (3a) using HSi(OEt)2Me as a hydrogen source
(Table 1). The reduction of 3a with 1.2 equiv of HSi(OEt)2Me
in the presence of 5 mol % of 2b in toluene at 50 °C yielded
the corresponding (R)-alcohol 4a in 12% yield with 24% ee
(entry 1). The use of 1.5 equiv of HSi(OEt)2Me increased the
yield and enantioselectivity (entry 2). In contrast, other
hydrosilanes, HSiPh2Me, HSiCl3, and H2SiPh2 were not
effective as hydrogen sources (entries 3-5). When the reac-
tion using HSi(OEt)2Me was performed at 80 °C, the yield
was improved to 91% without a decrease in enantioselec-
tivity (entry 6). It was found that the reaction rate and
enantioselectivity were significantly influenced by additives.
Use of a strong base (2 mol %), namely NaO-t-Bu and
NaOMe, increased the reaction rate but decreased the
enantioselectivity of 4a (entries 7 and 8). On the other hand,
the reaction in the presence of Na(acac) (2 mol %) was
completed within 1 h to give 4a in 99% yield with 49% ee
(entry 9). The catalytic reaction in the presence of Na(acac)
also proceeded at 50 °C to give 4a in 86% yield with the same
enantioselectivity (entry 10). Furthermore, the reaction sol-
vent affected the enantioselectivity. The reaction in THF
gave a result similar to that in toluene (entry 11). On the other
hand, reduction of 3a in hexane quantitatively provided the
(R)-alcohol 4a with 66% ee (entry 12).
˚
A) are also shorter than those of the phebox-Ru complexes
˚
(2.10-2.13 A). The Br ligand is coordinated to the position
vertical to the phebox plane, and the two CO ligands are
oriented in a cis arrangement. This CO configuration is
similar to that of (PCP)RuCl(CO)2.15 The Fe(1)-C(18)
˚
bond length of 1.839(2) A is longer than the Fe(1)-C(17)
˚
bond length of 1.792(2) A, probably due to the trans
influence of a phenyl fragment.
(12) Motoyama, Y.; Okano, M.; Narusawa, H.; Makihara, N.; Aoki,
K.; Nishiyama, H. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1580.
(13) Ito, J.; Ujiie, S.; Nishiyama, H. Organometallics 2009, 28, 630.
(14) Crystallographic data for 2a: C19H21BrCl2FeN2O4, Mr =
˚
548.04, temperature 143 K, triclinic, P1, a = 8.555(2) A, b =
˚
˚
11.224(3) A, c = 12.970(3) A, R = 69.062(5)°, β = 82.751(5)°, γ =
3
69.821(5)°, V = 1091.8(5) A , Z = 2; Fcalcd = 1.667 Mg/m3, μ = 2.793
˚
mm-1, 7847 reflections collected, 4993 independent reflections (R(int) =
0.0251), 4993/0/266 data/restraints/parameters, goodness of fit on F2
1.060, final R indices (I > 2σ(I)) R1 = 0.0333 and wR2 = 0.0881, R
indices (all data) R1 = 0.0370-a3nd wR2 = 0.0901, largest difference
˚
peak/hole 0.0901 and -0.379 A
.
(15) (a) Amoroso, D.; Jabri, A.; Yap, G. P. A.; Gusev, D. G.; dos
Santos, E. N.; Fogg, D. E. Organometallics 2004, 23, 4047. (b) Jia, G.;
Lee, H. M.; Williams, I. D. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 534, 173.
(16) For examples of reviews, see: (a) Noyori, R.; Ohkuma, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 40. (b) Transition Metals for Organic Synthesis,
2nd ed.; Beller, M., Bolm, C., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004.
(c) Tang, W.; Zhang, X. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3029. (d) Ikariya, T.; Blacker,
A. J. Acc. Chem. Rev. 2007, 40, 1300. (e) Nishiyama, H.; Itoh, K.
Asymmetric Hydrosilylation and Related Reactions. In Catalytic Asym-
metric Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York, 2000; Chapter 2.
(17) (a) Nishiyama, H.; Furuta, A. Chem. Commun. 2007, 760. (b)
Inagaki, T.; Le, T. P.; Furuta, A.; Ito, J.; Nishiyama, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2010,
16, 3090.
(18) (a) Shaikh, N. S.; Enthaler, S.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2497. (b) Addis, D.; Shaikh, N.; Zhou, S.; Das, S.;
Junge, K.; Beller, M. Chem. Asian J. 2010, 5, 1687. (c) Sui-Seng, C.; Feutel,
F.; Lough, A. J.; Morris, R. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 940. (d)
Mikhailine, A.; Lough, A. J.; Morris, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
1394. (e) Meyer, N.; Lough, A. J.; Morris, R. H. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15,
5605. (f) Morris, R. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2282. (g) Langlotz, B. K.;
Wadepohl, H.; Gade, L. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4670. (h) Naik,
A.; Maji, T.; Reiser, O. Chem. Commun. 2010, 4475.
Several ketones, e.g., 2-acetylanthracene (3b) and 2-acet-
ylnaphthalene (3c), were found to give the corresponding
secondary alcohols 4b (49% ee) and 4c (53% ee). In contrast,
4-methoxyphenyl methyl ketone (3d) and 4-tolyl methyl
ketone (3e) resulted in low enantioselectivities (21-38% ee).