J IRAN CHEM SOC
4.56 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.33 (m, 5H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): d 66.17, 68.14, 127.33, 128.45, 129.01, 136.76.
1-Azido-3-phenoxypropan-2-ol IR (neat): vꢀ N3
(2,105 cm-1); 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 2.06 (d,
2H), 2.69–2.81 (m, 1H), 4.05 (d, 2H), 4.32 (s, 1H),
6.91–6.97 (m, 2H), 7.01–7.04 (m, 1H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 2H).
13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 53.72, 68.82, 69.59,
115.14, 121.39, 129.93, 158.80.
2,800–2,950 cm-1 and 1,400–1,500 cm-1, respectively. In
addition, the presence of imidazolium unit was confirmed
by the bands at 1,619 cm-1 (imidazole –C=N bending) and
1,567 cm-1 (imidazole ring stretching). Therefore, the
successful introduction of PEG-ImBr onto silica surface
was verified through the FT-IR spectra.
The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curve of the
SiO2-PEG-ImBr showed mass loss of the organic materials
as they decompose upon heating (Fig. 2). The initial
weight loss up to 126 °C is due to the removal of physi-
cally adsorbed water and surface hydroxyl groups. The
weight loss of about 18 % between 150 and 420 °C may be
associated to the thermal decomposition of PEG-ImBr. On
the basis of this observation, the well grafting of PEG-ImBr
on the MNPs was also verified.
1-Azido-3-butoxypropan-2-ol IR (neat): vꢀ N3
(2,103 cm-1); 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.87 (t, 3H),
1.22–1.27 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.64 (m, 2H), 3.12 (s, 1H),
3.49–3.52 (m, 2H), 3.67 (t, 2H), 3.80 (d, 2H), 3.99–4.02
(m, 1H). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 15.18, 19.28,
32.47, 54.67, 68.77, 71.55, 71.67.
2-Azidocyclohexan-1-ol IR (neat): vꢀ N3 (2,096 cm-1);
1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.22–1.34 (m, 4H),
1.72–1.78 (m, 2H), 2.00–2.07 (m, 2H), 2.50 (s, 1H),
3.10–3.22 (m, 1H), 3.28–3.42 (m, 1H). 13C-NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3): d 24.38, 24.48, 24.51, 33.14, 62.14,
73.79.
To determine the amount of imidazolium bromide in
SiO2-PEG-ImBr, 0.01 g of the catalyst was immersed into
20 ml of 0.1 mol L-1 aqueous HNO3 solution. The bro-
mide ions were determined by Volhard’s method. The
amount of bromide equaled by imidazolium units was
2.85 mmol g-1. The amount of imidazolium units was also
determined by CHN analysis method (2.667 mmol g-1
)
Results and discussion
(Fig. 3) which is in good agreement with the obtained
result from the Volhard’s titration method.
A general synthetic route for the preparation of the silica-
bound 3-((polyethyleneglycol)ethyl)-8-methyl-1H-imida-
zol-3-ium bromide, SiO2-PEG-ImBr, is presented in
Scheme 2.
To start our investigation, we studied different solvent
effects on the course of the reaction of styrene oxide
(1 mmol) with azide anion (2 mmol) promoted by SiO2-
PEG-ImBr (0.2 g). The reaction was carried out in dieth-
ylether, chloroform, acetonitrile, dichloromethane, water
and ethanol. From the results given in Table 1, it fallows
that the best solvent for this reaction is water. Although,
The FT-IR spectra of silica gel and SiO2-PEG-ImBr are
shown in Fig. 1. In the SiO2-PEG-ImBr spectrum (b), the
C–H stretching and bending bands can be observed at
Scheme 2 Representative
preparation of silica-bound
3-((polyethyleneglycol)ethyl)-8-
methyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium
bromide
O
SOCl2/pyridine
O
NaBr
180oC
HO
HO
nCH2CH2OH
nCH2CH2Br
HO
nCH2CH2Cl
toluene
HO-PEG-Cl
O
HO-PEG-Br
CH2Cl2
N2/ 3 h
O
SiO2
O
nCH2CH2Br
SiO2-PEG-Br
N2
SiO2
OH + SOCl2
SiO2
Cl
r.t. / 4h
1-methyl imidazole
80oC/ 48 h
O
NCH3
+
SiO2
O
nCH2CH2
N
Br-
SiO2-PEG-ImBr
123