Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 148 ͑9͒ D109-D111 ͑2001͒
D111
CoSb3.—The products of the electrolysis of the nominally 95
mol % metaantimonate were metallic antimony ͑70%͒ and CoSb3
͑29%͒. Again, the melt composition needs to be adjusted to produce
phase pure material. Changing to another source of antimony, such
as potassium hexahydroxyantimonate, may also be useful.
The above results show that all three pnictide skutterudites can
be synthesized by molten salt electrolysis. While cobalt triphosphide
was obtained as a single phase, the arsenide and antimonide have
not yet been obtained in pure form. The principal barrier to obtain-
ing these materials as a single phase is the adjustment of the melt
composition.
Conclusions
It was demonstrated for the first time that the binary skutterudite
compounds, CoPn3, could be synthesized electrochemically. How-
ever, there is some anomalous behavior in the electrodeposition of
the phosphorous compounds that remains to be understood. Using
platinum metal as electrodes for the electrodeposition of CoP3 did
not work well because it reacted with phosphorous to form a plati-
num phosphide phase. Ag cathodes gave poor deposition rates under
the experimental condition investigated, and resulted in a very small
amount of the synthesis products. Running more experiments at
longer time will be useful to determine whether Ag is a suitable
electrode material. In the case of CoAs3 and CoSb3, the optimum
melt compositions for the synthesis of phase pure compounds need
to be determined.
There are other interesting areas of research that may follow
from these results. These include the synthesis of pure or doped
mixed pnictide skutterudites, and the electrodeposition of thin films
on suitable substrates. The latter would greatly facilitate the study of
their thermoelectric properties.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of electrochemically synthesized skutterudites: ͑a͒
CoP3, ͑b͒ CoAs3, and ͑c͒ CoSb3.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the office of Naval Research
through Grant no. N00014-97-1-0524 and was carried out in the
facilities of the Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials ͑former
Center for Materials Research͒ at Stanford University.
the composition of the synthesis products. Since the former tech-
nique only gives the relative amount of elemental constituents, it
could not have been used to distinguish between the pure CoP2
phase or a 50:50 mixture of CoP3 and CoP. In our experiments, the
XRD patterns did not reveal any sign of CoP2 formation and it is
possible that this phase may not form under normal experimental
conditions.
The difficulty in obtaining CoP2 was also mentioned by
Donohue17 who reported the presence of CoP2 phase only when
prepared at high pressure. Since the data in the Co-P phase
diagram18 are incomplete, especially in the high phosphorus region,
it cannot be precisely determined whether CoP2 is a thermodynami-
cally stable phase. It is possible, however, that this compound may
form peritectically under certain conditions, similar to the behavior
of the di- and tripnictides compounds in Co-As15 and Co-Sb16 sys-
tems
Stanford University assisted in meeting the publication costs of this ar-
ticle.
References
1. B. C. Sales, D. Mandrus, and R. K. Williams, Science, 272, 1325 ͑1996͒.
2. J-P. Fleurial, T. Caillat, A. Borshchevsky, D. T. Morelli, and G. P. Meisner, in
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Thermoelectrics, p. 91, Insti-
tute of Electrical Engineers ͑1996͒.
3. W. Biltz and M. Heimbrecht, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 241, 349 ͑1939͒.
4. S. Rundqvist and N.-O. Ersson, Ark. Kemi, 30, 103 ͑1968͒.
5. H. D. Lutz and G. Kliche, J. Solid State Chem., 40, 64 ͑1981͒.
6. A. Kjekshus and T. Rakke, Acta Chem. Scand., A28, 99 ͑1974͒.
7. J. W. Sharp, E. C. Jones, R. K. Williams, P. M. Martin, and B. C. Sales, J. Appl.
Phys., 78, 2, 1013 ͑1995͒.
8. G. Kliche, Solid State Commun., 80, 1, 73 ͑1991͒.
9. P. Jolibois, Comptes rendus Acad. Sci. (Paris), 150, 106 ͑1910͒.
10. A. Watcharapasorn, R. C. DeMattei, R. S. Feigelson, T. Caillat, A. Borshchevsky,
G. J. Snyder, and J.-P. Fleurial, J. Appl. Phys., 86, 11, 6213 ͑1999͒.
11. P. M. Chene, Ann. Chim. (Paris), 15, 187 ͑1941͒.
12. J. J. Cuomo and R. J. Gambino, J. Electrochem. Soc., 115, 755 ͑1968͒.
13. R. C. DeMattei, D. Elwell, and R. S. Feigelson, J. Cryst. Growth, 44, 545 ͑1978͒.
14. R. C. DeMattei, D. Elwell, and R. S. Feigelson, J. Cryst. Growth, 43, 643 ͑1978͒.
15. K. Ishida and T. Nishizawa, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, H. Okamoto, P. R.
Subramanian, and L. Kacprzak, Editors, Vol. 1, p. 270, ASM International, OH
͑1990͒.
CoAs3.—The product of the electrolysis of the 95 mol %
metaarsenite melt contained approximately 90% CoAs3 and 10%
CoAs2 as estimated from the XRD pattern ͑Fig. 4b͒. There was
evidence that most of the metaarsenate had evaporated from the melt
during the two day experiment. Although there have been no further
attempts to synthesize phase pure CoAs3, it is clear in which direc-
tion the melt composition must be modified. Not only will the ratio
of metaarsenite to cobalt ion have to be changed, but other compo-
nents will have to be added to reduce the melting temperature of the
charge and therefore its vapor pressure. This was done with the
melts for the electrochemical synthesis of GaAs.14
16. K. Ishida and T. Nishizawa, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, H. Okamoto, P. R.
Subramanian, and L. Kacprzak, Editors, Vol. 2, p. 1234, ASM International, OH
͑1990͒.
17. P. C. Donohue, Mater. Res. Bull., 7, 943 ͑1972͒.
18. K. Ishida and T. Nishizawa, Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, H. Okamoto, P. R.
Subramanian and L. Kacprzak, Editors, Vol. 2, p. 1219, ASM International, OH
͑1990͒.
Downloaded on 2014-11-30 to IP 138.251.14.35 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).