Chemistry Letters 2002
75
rate constant was calculated as 0.011 minꢂ1. The G(-CA) value
(which is the micromolar consumption of CA per joule of
radiation energy), was calculated from the slope of the initial
decay of CA as 0.1 ꢂmol Jꢂ1. No significant change in
concentration of CA was observed on its reaction with ꢁOH
(except that at higher time of irradiation, there was a slow
decrease in the concentration) under this condition (Figure 2)
indicating a much lower efficiency of ꢁOH in degrading CA.
SO4ꢁꢂ is a powerful oxidant (E0ðSO4ꢁꢂ=SO42ꢂÞ ¼ 2:43 V),
previous reports5;7;8 has made clear that even the well known
powerful oxidant, OH, is inefficient in the degradation of CA.
Undoubtedly, this difference in the efficiency of degradation is
due to the difference in their mode of reactions.
ꢁ
In conclusion, the possibility of radical mediated degradation
of CA is reported for the first time and this reaction could possibly
be used for the complete degradation of CA in aqueous medium. It
ꢁꢂ
is also interesting to note that the high efficiency of SO4 over
ꢁOH mediated degradation is a result of a different reaction
mechanism compared to ꢁOH. A detailed mechanistic study using
a variety of substituted triazines are currently in progress.
We thank Prof. P. Natarajan and Dr. P. Ramamurthy, the
National Centre for Ultrafast Processes (NCUFP), Chennai, for
providing the laser flash photolysis facility. We also thank the
Rubber Research Institute of India (RRII), Kottayam for the ꢁ-
radiolysis experiments. RV is thankful to CSIR, New Delhi, for a
fellowship.
ꢁ
ꢁꢂ
similar to OH. The SO4 is proposed to undergo an electron
transfer reaction with CA forming a radical cation (CAꢁþ) in the
initial step based on the earlier knowledge on its reaction with
pyrimidines and substituted benzenes.10{14 The possibility of
deprotonation of CAꢁþ like in the case of pyrimidine der-
ivatives,14 may be ruled out keeping in view of its structure where
there is no favorable proton for elimination (reaction 6). The
spectral features and the results with O2 (stability of the spectra in
the presence of O2) did not support the possible hydrolysis of
CAꢁþ leading to OH-adduct as the carbon centered OH-adduct
radicals of 2,4,6–trimethoxy–1,3,5–triazine (TMT) and 1,3,5–
triazine (T) were reported to have different spectral
characteristics2 and the fact that generally O2 has a high reactivity
with any carbon centered aromatic neutral radicals (diffusion
controlled) as well as with nitrogen centered radicals
(ꢄ107 dm3 molꢂ1 s1) forming peroxyl radicals.15 This leads to
the conclusion that the intermediate having the absorption spectra
(with ꢀmax at 330 nm) possesses a radical site neither at carbon
nor at nitrogen. The existence of a SO4ꢁꢂ-CA adduct (precursor of
CAꢁþ) is also ruled out because such an adduct would be a carbon
centered radical and it can have high reactivity towards O2.
Therefore, it is proposed that the species existing at pH 5 with
ꢀmax at 330 nm is a radical cation, CAꢁþ (reaction 6) and its
stability in the microsecond time scale is likely due to the
presence of three hydroxy groups substituted in the triazine ring.
The radical cations are, in general, known to react with O2 only
very slowly.16 Relatively longer lived (t1=2 ꢅ 1 ꢂs) radical
cations are reported to be formed with a number of aromatic
compounds in solution such as methyl substituted thymines.14
References
1
R. M. Harrison, in ‘‘Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control,’’
2nd ed., Royal Society of Chemistry, London (1990).
J. M. Joseph, T. A. Jacob, V. M. Manoj, C. T. Aravindaku-
mar, H. Mohan, and J. P. Mittal, J. Agric. Food Chem. 48,
3704 (2000).
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
L. Donnare, R. Arnaud, J. Lemaire, A. Deflandre, and H.
Richard, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 96, 71 (1996).
A. Tauber and C. von Sonntag, Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol.,
28, 15 (2000).
M. C. Gonzalez, A. M. Braun, A. B. Prevot, and E. Pelizzetti,
Chemosphere, 28, 2121 (1994).
P. Ezio, V. Maurino, M. Claudio, P. Edmando, O. Zerbinati,
and M. L. Tosato, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1559 (1990).
G. Y. S. Chan, M. J. Hudson, and N. S. Isaacs J. Phys. Org.
Chem., 5, 600 (1992).
E. Pelizzetti, C. Minero, and V. Carlin, New. J. Chem., 17, 315
(1993).
B. Venkatachalapathy, and P. Ramamurthy, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys., 1, 2223 (1999).
10 S. Steenken, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 87, 113 (1987).
11 G. V. Buxton, J. R. Langan and J. R. Smith, J. Phys. Chem.
90, 6309 (1986).
12 G. Merga, B. S. M. Rao, H. Mohan, and J. P. Mittal, J. Phys.
Chem., 98, 9158 (1994).
13 G. Merga, C. T. Aravindakumar, H. Mohan, and J. P. Mittal,
J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 90, 597 (1994).
14 D. J. Deeble, M. N. Schuchmann, S. Steenken, and C.
von Sonntag, J. Phys. Chem., 94, 8186 (1990).
15 R. L. Willson, Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 17, 349 (1970).
16 K. Sehested and J. Holcman, J. Phys. Chem., 82, 651 (1978).
The decay of CA (Figure 2) is obviously initiated by a
bimolecular reaction of the intermediate species, most likely the
radical cation. It is not clear from the laser flash photolysis studies
that this radical cation may undergo hydrolysis at a later stage
(> 200 ꢂs). On the other hand, the consumption of CA (almost
76% after 18 kGy, Figure 2) demonstrates the potential useful-
ness of this reaction. This study (see Figure 2) as well as from