Ming-Qiang Zhu et al.
Table 1. Optical properties of TPE-DTE-PMI (1O) in different matrices.
est among the three compounds owing to the electron-with-
drawing PMI group, while both 1O and 2O contain elec-
tron-donating groups. After irradiation with UV light, the
conjugation is extended by the closed-form DTE. Therefore,
photochromic fluorescence resonance energy transfer from
PMI to the ring-closed isomer of DTE as an efficient
quencher is induced by the photoisomerization.
[b]
[c]
Solvent Df[a]
lmax (abs.) lmax (PL) Stokes Shift FFÀO
FFÀPSS
[nm]
[nm]
[nm]
[%]
[%]
Toluene 0.014 516.5
564.0
583.0
623.0
589.0
596.0
47.5
71.5
107
78.5
87.5
80
65
22
–
18
19
11
THF
0.21
0.27
–
511.5
516.0
510.5
508.5
DMF
PMMA
PMA
–
–
Optimized structures of both 1O and 1C obtained by
density functional theory (DFT) calculations are shown in
Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. In the open form,
1O, the HOMO is localized around TPE and the adjacent
thiophene subunits with significant orbital density, while the
LUMO in 1O is restricted to the strong electron-withdraw-
ing PMI subunit. By comparison, the HOMO in 1C is delo-
calized with orbital density transfer from TPE through the
thiophene subunit due to the extended conjugation. The
LUMOs in 1C are localized around PMI and the pentafluor-
ocyclopentene. The HOMOs and LUMOs of 1O and 1C in-
dicated that photoswitchable intramolecular charge and
energy transfer occurs in the donor–photochromic bridge–
acceptor triad upon alternating irradiation with UV and visi-
ble light. Thus, it is demonstrated experimentally that, by
a primary externally photoswitching process (photoisomeri-
zation of DTE), two secondary externally initiated processes
(photoinduced intramolecular charge transfer in the ring-
opened isomer and fluorescence resonance energy transfer
in the ring-closed isomer) can be switched reversibly by UV/
visible light.
The initial ring-opened isomer 1O exhibits one absorption
peak at around 510 nm, which was observed in solution and
in solid film. Upon irradiation with UV light (302 nm), the
resulting UV/Vis absorption spectra (Figure 2a) shows the
evolution of two peaks around 510 nm and 620 nm, in which
the former peak is attributed to the PMI moiety and the
latter one to the closed form in DTE. Upon UV irradiation
for 120 s at around 0.85 mWcmÀ2, TPE-DTE-PMI in tolu-
ene attained 95% of the absorbance at the photostationary
state (PSS) under 302 nm irradiation. The photoisomeriza-
tion attains the stationary state at about 3 min. The absorb-
ance of 1O and 1C at 620 nm increased and decreased re-
versibly in solution with alternating irradiation with UV and
visible light, thus demonstrating the highly reversible and bi-
stable photochromism between 1O and 1C (Figure 2b).
The initial open-form compound 1O exhibits a strong
emission from PMI at around 560–620 nm in solution and in
the solid film, depending on the polarity of the solvent or
polymer matrices. The resulting fluorescence spectra (Fig-
ure 3a and Figure S4, Supporting Information) of TPE-
DTE-PMI in solution upon UV irradiation (302 nm) show
a gradual decrease in the emission intensity at 560–600 nm
because of the photochromic fluorescence resonance energy
transfer of PMI to the ring-closed isomer of DTE in 1C.
The reversibility of this process can be demonstrated by cy-
cling forward and backward between the open and closed
form. When a solution of 1O in toluene was excited at
514 nm, a strong emission at 567 nm was observed and, after
UV irradiation, fluorescence quenching >80% was detect-
[a] Df=the orientational polarisability. lmax (abs) is the lowest energy ab-
sorption peak at 1 mm of 1O; lmax (PL) was measured at lex =514 nm and
1 mm of 1O. [b] Quantum yield of the open form. [c] Quantum yield of
the photostationary state (302 nm, PSS). FF values were estimated
against rhodamine B (quantum yield of 70% in ethanol), lex =514 nm
(lem =520–800 nm). PMMA=polymethyl methacrylate. PMA=polyme-
thacrylate.
structureless (Table 1). The large solvatochromic shift of the
fluorescence (620 nm in DMF compared to 560 nm in tolu-
ene) in polar solvents indicates a strong photo-induced in-
tramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character of the fluores-
cent state. As predicted, upon irradiation with UV light
(302 nm), there is a significant energy overlap between the
emission band of PMI and the absorption band of 1C. Thus,
the resulting fluorescence of 1O decreases upon UV irradia-
tion, thereby indicating a photochromic fluorescence reso-
nance energy transfer from PMI to the ring-closed isomer of
DTE as an efficient quencher, which originates from photoi-
somerization of 1O to 1C (Figure 1b). The FRET quench-
ing efficiency in TPE-DTE-PMI after UV irradiation was
calculated from the observed quenching of the donor inten-
sity. For the open form of DTE (DTEO) the conjugation is
markedly restricted, and thus only charge transfer is allowed
within the TPE-DTE-PMI triad. On the contrary, for the
closed form of DTE (DTEC) for which the conjugation is
obviously improved, the emission of PMI overlaps well with
the absorbance of DTEC. Therefore, energy transfer domi-
nates in the closed form of TPE-DTE-PMI triad.[10a]
Compounds 1O, 2O, and 3O possess the same DTE-PMI
subunits. The difference in their molecular structure is that
the three fluorophores contain different substituted groups
at the other terminus of the triads. Therefore, the compari-
son of 1O with 2O and 3O could lead to insights into the
optical properties influenced by structural differences. The
absorbance and fluorescence of the three fluorophores
change similarly with an increasing polarity of the solvent.
The quantum yields of 1O, 2O, and 3O are very close in tol-
uene (~80%) and THF (65%). The three compounds also
have the similar emission spectra in DMF. It is worth noting
that 1O has the highest quantum yield in DMF (22%),
while it is 14% for 2O and 11% for 3O (Table S2, Support-
ing Information). The ICT properties in the open-form
triads are the same, while an electron-donating group such
as TPE and C8H17OPh could improve the quantum yields of
the triads in polar solvents. The fact that TPE-DTE-PMI
has the strongest emission in a good solvent argues against
the AIE effect, as TPE usually quenches emission in a good
solvent. It seems that here the AIE effect of TPE is too
weak to be observed. The photochromism of 3O is the poor-
3
&
&
Chem. Asian J. 2013, 00, 0 – 0
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ