392
R. Mahesh et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 389–392
introduction of methyl group on o-phenylenediamine, an electron releasing substituent, did not alter the reaction time
and not much difference was observed in the yield (entry 2). o-Phenylenediamines bearing electron withdrawing
substituents (entries 3–6 and 8) decreased the rate of reaction notably, the nitro substituent (entry 6) and the obtained
yields were also low as compared to no substituent on the o-phenylenediamine. Further, we extended our study by
replacing benzil with other 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds such as diethyl ketomalonate (entries 9–11) and pyruvic acid
(entries 12–14). Regarding the rate of reaction, the last two 1,2-dicarbonyls did not discriminate the electron releasing
or withdrawing group(s) presence on the o-phenylenediamine for the condensation, which indicated the high reactivity
of the carbonyl group. The Bronsted acid nature of citric acid, promotes the reaction by involving in both nucelophilic
addition as well as in dehydration steps.
2. Conclusion
The mild reaction conditions, short duration of reaction time, simple isolation procedure and eco-friendly nature of
citric acid as a catalyst, will make this method become an attractive greener technique for the construction of
quinoxalines and notably similar molecules, compared to the existing methods.
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by the University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India.
References
[1] M.M. Badran, K.A.M. Abouzid, M.H.M. Hussein, Arch. Pharm. Res. 26 (2003) 107.
[2] R.A. Smits, H.D. Lim, A. Hanzer, et al. J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 2457.
[3] J. Guillon, P. Grellier, M. Labaied, et al. J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 1997.
[4] P. Sanna, A. Carta, M. Loriga, et al. Farmaco 54 (1999) 161.
[5] R. Sarges, H.R. Howard, R.G. Browne, J. Med. Chem. 33 (1990) 2240.
[6] N.D. Sonawane, D.W. Rangnekar, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 39 (2002) 303.
[7] K.R. Justin Thomas, M. Velusamy, J.T. Lin, et al. Chem. Mater. 17 (2005) 1860.
[8] S. Dailey, J.W. Feast, R.J. Peace, et al. J. Mater. Chem. 11 (2001) 2238.
[9] S.Y. Kim, K.H. Park, Y.K. Chung, Chem. Commun. 10 (2005) 1321.
[10] E. Harms, Org. Process Res. Dev. 8 (2004) 666.
[11] C.S. Cho, W.X. Ren, S.C. Shim, Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 4665.
[12] D. Aparicio, O.A. Attanasi, P. Filippone, et al. J. Org. Chem. 71 (2006) 5897.
[13] S. Antoniotti, E. Dun˜ach, Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 3971.
[14] B. Das, K. Venkateswarlu, K. Suneel, et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 48 (2007) 5371.
[15] (a) Z. Wu, N.J. Ede, Tetrahedron Lett. 42 (2001) 8115;
(b) S.K. Singh, P. Gupta, S. Duggineni, et al. Synlett 14 (2003) 2147.
[16] D.J. Brown, in: E.C. Taylor, P. Wipf (Eds.), The Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2004.
[17] (a) S.V. More, M.N.V. Sastry, C.C. Wang, et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 46 (2005) 6345;
(b) P. Hazarika, P. Gogoi, D. Konwar, Synth. Commun. 37 (2007) 3447.
[18] J.F. Zhou, G.X. Gong, K.B. Shi, et al. J. Chin. Chem. Lett. 20 (2009) 672.
[19] M.M. Heravi, S. Taheri, K. Bakhtiari, et al. Catal. Commun. 8 (2007) 211.
[20] S.V. More, M.N.V. Sastry, C.F. Yao, Green Chem. 8 (2006) 91.
[21] X.Z.J. Zhang, X.Y. Wang, J. Sun, et al. Chin. Chem. Lett. 21 (2010) 95.
[22] General procedure: A mixture of o-phenylenediamine (1 mmol), 1,2-dicarbonyl compound (1 equiv.) and citric acid (3 mol%) in ethanol was
stirred at room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin layer chromatography. After completion of the reaction,
ethanol was removed under vacuum. The obtained masses were stirred with crushed ice for the period of 10 min, filtered and dried under
vacuum. The synthesized compounds were characterized by spectral analysis. Selected compounds analytical data: 2,3-Diphenyl-6-
(trifluoromethyl)quinoxaline (3e): yield: 86%; mp: 130–132 8C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 8.50 (s, 1H), 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 8.72 Hz),
7.95 (dd, 1H, J = 8.72 Hz), 7.55 (m, 4H), 7.42 (m, 6H): IR (KBr, cmÀ1); 3062, 2962, 2900, 1625, 1544, 1500, 1444, 1329, 837, 808, 770 and
649; MS (ESI); m/z 351 (M+1)+. Ethyl 6,7-dimethyl-3-oxo-3,4-dihydroquinoxaline-2-carboxylate (3j): yield: 88%; mp: 197–198 8C; 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz): d 12.57 (s, 1H, D2O exchangeable), 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.26 (d, 1H), 4.57 (q, 2H, J = 13.6 Hz), 2.41 (s, 3H), 2.36 (s, 3H), 1.50 (t,
3H, J = 13.6 Hz): IR (KBr, cmÀ1); 3305, 2976, 2866, 2819, 2787, 2731, 1747, 1658, 1548, 1494, 1444, 1367,1271, 1232, 1101, 925 and 584;
MS (ESI): m/z 247 (M+1)+. 3-Methylquinoxalin-2(1H)-one (3l); yield: 86%; mp: 236–238 8C; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): d 12.18 (s, 1H,
D2O exchangeable), 7.72 (d, 1H), 7.44 (dd, 1H), 7.31(m, 1H), 7.26 (m, 1H), 2.59 (s, 3H); IR (KBr, cmÀ1); 3341, 3052, 3000, 2974, 2960, 2899,
2841,1672, 1566, 1485, 1433, 1371, 893, 754, 694, 599 and 586; MS (ESI): m/z 161 (M+1)+.