in the reference dye (see Fig. S3 in ESIw). This result supports
that Zn(II) still has been present in the indicator dye molecules
which are attached to the nanoparticles’ surface and that,
upon removal of Zn(II) from the DPA centre using EDTA,
sensitivity towards ATP is no longer observed. With these
results in mind, the possibility of removal and subsequent
rebinding of Zn(II) to the nanoparticles and how this process
affected their sensitivity towards ATP was investigated. Proven
successful, this approach would provide a mean of ‘‘recycling’’
the nanoparticles, suggesting their possible application in
8
microfluidics, if the nanoparticles were physically attached
to such a system. Accordingly, an aliquot of nanoparticles was
suspended in a vial containing an aqueous solution of EDTA
and stirred overnight. The nanoparticles were then washed
thoroughly with water. Upon addition of ATP to a suspension
of nanoparticles, no changes were observed in the recorded
spectra. However, when Zn(II) was added to the same cuvette,
a considerable increase of the indicator fluorescence (0.5 fold)
occurred, while the reference dye’s emission remained unaltered
Fig. 4 Confocal fluorescence micrographs of NRK cells incubated
ꢂ1
(
Fig. S4 in ESIw). This proves not only that Zn(II) was
with nanoparticles (0.2 mg mL ) for 48 hours: (a) rhodamine-
removed and rebound, but also that a full regeneration of
the detection capacity of the nanoparticles towards ATP was
achieved.
reference dye, (b) naphthalimide-indicator dye, (c) merge and (d)
rhodamine-reference dye after cell fixation and DAPI-nuclear staining.
cells without using additional agents and without exerting
cytotoxic effects, they are superior to most organic fluoro-
phores and may pave the way to applications in biomedical
studies.
In order to evaluate the potential of the fluorescent nano-
particles for biomedical applications we studied cellular uptake
and cytotoxic effects using epithelial normal rat kidney (NRK)
cells. Nanoparticle cytotoxicity was investigated by impedimetric
monitoring of the cell response during nanoparticle exposure for
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the
project MO 1062/5-2 of Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and
from the EU Projects NASCENT (MRTN-CT-2006-033873)
and NIR NanoBioSens (PIEF-GA-2008-220775). This work
48 hours. Impedimetric monitoring was the method of choice as
it works label-free and the readout does not interfere with the
nanoparticles’ luminescence. The bar chart in Fig. S5 (ESIw)
shows cell viability for different nanoparticle concentrations.
Untreated cells were set to 100%, as positive control cells were
treated with 0.1% (w/v) Saponin which is known to permeablize
the plasma membrane leading to immediate cell lysis. Results
indicate that cell viability was not impaired at all by exposure
¨
was also supported by the Bayerische Staatsministerium fur
Wirtschaft, Infrastruktur, Verkehr und Technologie within
project AZ-Nr.: 20.10-3410-2 (Projekt Sensormaterialien).
Notes and references
to ATP-sensing nanoparticles at concentrations ranging from
ꢂ1
1 (a) A. Bianchi, K. Bowman-James, E. Gracıa-Espana, Supramolecular
´
0.1 to 0.4 mg mL
.
Chemistry of Anions, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1997; (b) E. Takeda,
H. Yamamoto, K. Nashiki, T. Sato, H. Arai and Y. Taketani, J. Cell.
Mol. Med., 2004, 8, 191; (c) C. Spangler, M. Schaeferling and
O. S. Wolfbeis, Microchim. Acta, 2008, 161, 1.
To study nanoparticle incorporation NRK cells were
ꢂ1
incubated with 0.2 mg mL of nanoparticles for 48 hours.
Afterwards, cells were extensively washed using PBS buffer
and the uptake of particles was studied by confocal laser
scanning microscopy. Cells were imaged in physiological
buffer at pH 7.4. Micrographs in Fig. 4 show typical optical
xy-sections through the NRK cell bodies. The fluorescence of
the rhodamine dye (a) and the naphthalimide dye (b) were
recorded separately using individual excitation and emission
filters. As depicted in the merged image (c) the reference
and indicator dyes perfectly co-localize in the cytoplasm of
the cells. Mixed colors indicate that particles are present
in different cellular compartments. For a better evaluation
of intracellular localization of nanoparticles a DAPI-based
staining of the nucleus was performed in addition. Subsequent
microscopic inspection reveals that nanoparticles are present
in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleoplasm (Fig. 4d). Further
research regarding nanoparticle uptake mechanism and
detailed intracellular localization are currently ongoing. Since
nanoparticles were incorporated in non-phagocytosing animal
2
(a) Y. Jin, S. Kannan, M. Wu and X. Zhao, Chem. Res. Toxicol.,
2007, 20, 1126; (b) A. Dahm and H. Eriksson, J. Biotechnol., 2004,
111, 279.
3 (a) A. Ojida, Y. Mito-oka, M. Inoue and I. Hamachi, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 6256; (b) T. Sakamoto, A. Ojida and I. Hamachi,
Chem. Commun., 2009, 141.
4
A. J. Moro, P. J. Cywinski, S. Ko
Commun., 2010, 46, 1085.
(a) T. Doussineau, S. Trupp and G. J. Mohr, J. Colloid Interface
Sci., 2009, 339, 266; (b) A. Grafe, S. E. Stanca, S. Nietzsche,
L. Kubicova, R. Beckert, C. Biskup and G. J. Mohr, Anal. Chem.,
008, 80, 6526.
¨
rsten and G. J. Mohr, Chem.
5
¨
2
6 (a) D. R. Larson, H. Ow, H. D. Vishwasrao, A. A. Heikal,
U. Wiesner and W. W. Webb, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 2677;
(b) S. Roy, R. Woolley, B. D. MacCraith and C. McDonagh,
Langmuir, 2010, 26, 13741.
7 M. W. Hosseini, A. J. Blacker and J.-M. Lehn, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1990, 112, 3896; M. Shionoya, T. Ikeda, E. Kimura and M. Shire,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3848.
8
(a) K. R. Ackermann, T. Henkel and J. Popp, ChemPhysChem,
007, 8, 2665; (b) A. Funfak, J. Cao, O. S. Wolfbeis, K. Martin and
2
J. M. Ko
¨
hler, Microchim. Acta, 2009, 164, 279.
6
068 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6066–6068
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011