ACS Catalysis
Research Article
principle indicates the higher efficiency on the separation and
zone, while the lowest point in the conduction bands of A-
CTF-2 is close to the γ point, as shown in Figure 5. The
indirect band gap structures of both CTFs in Figure 5a,b
suggest that the electronic transition process requires phonons
to participate in changing the electron momentum and thus
inhibit the recombination of electrons and holes. Such energy
band structure significantly affects the migration of carriers.
The effective carrier masses for the edge states of CTF-1
samples are m* = 1.71m and m* = 0.844m , while those for A-
61
transfer of photogenerated charge carriers for A-CTF-2. The
transient photocurrent responses in Figure 4g also exhibit a
higher photocurrent density on A-CTF-2, which further
illustrates the more efficient separation of photogenerated
electron−hole pairs, indicating the promoted transfer kinetics
62
of charge carriers. The enhanced charge separation and
transfer efficiency were also confirmed by EIS in the dark and
under visible light. Obviously, A-CTF-2 presents a smaller arc
radius and a lower resistance in charge transportation than that
of CTF-1 (Figure 4h), and the arc radius is further decreased
under visible light (Figure 4i), strongly suggesting that A-CTF-
h
0
e
0
CTF-2 samples are m* = 1.45m and m* = 0.352m (m
h
0
e
0
0
denotes the electron rest mass). These results suggest that the
incorporation of alkynyl groups causes a faster migration of the
A-CTF-2 band-edge carriers, resulting in their easier transfer to
the molecules from its framework. Furthermore, the larger
relative effective mass (m*/m*) of A-CTF-2 also reflects its
63
2
possesses superior charge-transfer efficiency, in line with its
efficient charge separation efficiency. These photoelectrochem-
ical analyses provide solid proof that A-CTF-2 shows enhanced
separation and migration of charge carriers, which can be
attributed to the extended π-conjugated structure and
migration distance of photogenerated charge carriers because
of the incorporation of the acetenyl group into the skeleton.
DFT Calculations. For an in-depth understanding of the
electronic structural features at the atomic level, the
monolayers of CTF-1 and A-CTF-2 were investigated by
DFT calculations. The light absorption and exciton formation
processes from the electronic structure of the two CTFs were
first simulated. The calculated band structures with an ideal
infinite model shown in Figure 5a,b (upper panel) suggest the
indirect band gaps of 2.55 and 2.36 eV for CTF-1 and A-CTF-
h
e
6
4
lower carrier recombination efficiency, which strongly
indicates a superior photocatalytic activity for A-CTF-2.
Additionally, in order to evaluate the lifetimes of the
photoexcited carriers, we thus calculated the transition dipole
65
moments (Pa→b = φ |−r|
̂
φj) between the ground state and
first excited state of the two COFs. As shown in Figure 5a,b
lower panel), it is obvious that the electrons on the VBM of
i
(
A-CTF-2 have greater transition probability and oscillator
strength. The fluorescence lifetimes of COFs are simulated via
3
τ =
,
w h e r e t h e o s c i l l a t o r s t r e n g t h
2
2 * f * ΔE
2
3
2
f = ΔE|φ| − r|
̂
φ| and ΔE is the energy difference between
i
j
2
, respectively, which are in good agreement with the
state i (φ ) and state j (φ ), only considering the first excited
i
j
experimental values. In order to better understand the
difference between the electronic structures of the two
CTFs, we plot the total density of states (Figure S10).
Compared with CTF-1, as the alkynyl group in A-CTF-2
reduces the energy of the conduction band minimum (CBM)
state, electrons in the valence band maximum (VBM) state are
more likely to be excited to form electron−hole pairs under
light illumination. The reduction of the band gap can facilitate
the utilization efficiency of the visible light. The simulated
CBM and VBM (vs vacuum) of CTF-1 locate at −2.626 and
66
state, suggesting the fluorescence lifetimes of 11.2 and 13.5
ns for CTF-1 and A-CTF-2. The prolonged lifetime for A-
CTF-2 further demonstrates the higher stabilization of carriers
because of the existence of alkynyls. Furthermore, the charge
separation and mobility were simulated by NAMD, with a hot
carriers directly migrate from the donor to acceptor along with
the skeleton (Figure 6a,b), resulting in the construction of an
internal electric field; also, the time of charge carrier mobility
in A-CTF-2 is distinctly prolonged compared with that of
CTF-1 due to the extended π-conjugation. For both the COFs,
the hot hole relaxation time is much longer than the hot
electron relaxation time, which proves that the relaxation
process of the holes is the rate-determining step of electron−
−
Moreover, the VBM electron-state density distribution of
CTF-1 spatially overlaps and is mainly distributed in the
triphenylamine donor along with the benzene π-conjugation
units. The CBM is only located over triazine acceptors (Figure
46
hole pair recombination. Correspondingly, the lifetime of the
generated hot electrons and holes in A-CTF-2 is also longer
than that of CTF-1. From the perspective of the hot carrier
dynamic process, the hot carriers of A-CTF-2 have a thermal
equilibrium time. The hot carriers would not immediately cool
from the excited state to the ground state, as shown in Figure
6c,d. The alkynyl group of A-CTF-2 not only acts as a bridge
for carrier transfer but also becomes a stable group for hot
carriers. The incorporation of the alkynyl group in A-CTF-2
leads to a longer carrier migration distance, implying a better
stabilization of electrons and holes in the excited state. The
above discussion on the nonequilibrium kinetics of excitons
provides us with a clear theoretical picture, which proves that
the alkynyl group of A-CTF-2 is an important reason for its
excellent photocatalytic performance.
5
c). This means that the charges can migrate from the tertiary
amine and π-conjugation units to the triazine moiety under the
light irradiation. A similar phenomenon can also be observed
from A-CTF-2 (Figure 5d). Nevertheless, alkynyls also
contribute some charges to the VBM; also, partial electrons
can stay on the alkynyls in the CBM, which means that the
alkynyl can disperse the charge concentration of the triazine
unit. The donor part and acceptor part of the two CTFs are
separated in space, so photogenerated electrons need to
undergo a long-range charge transfer to recombine with holes.
From the projections of the three-dimensional (3D) energy
band structure of CTF-1 and A-CTF-2, the electronic
structures of the VBM state of both are almost the same, but
the compositions of the CBM state have distinct differences.
Although the VBM and CBM of both COFs are composed of
the p orbitals of the C and N atoms, the energy band
Photocatalytic Activities. With the experimental and
theoretical investigations on the photoelectric properties of
CTF-1 and A-CTF-2, a visible-light-driven oxidative coupling
reaction of primary amines was also conducted to evaluate
z
dispersion relationship of A-CTF-2 containing alkynyl groups
is very different from that of CTF-1. The lowest point in the
conduction bands of CTF-1 is at the edge of the first Brillouin
7
435
ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 7429−7441