26
R.L. Prasad et al. / Thermochimica Acta 511 (2010) 17–26
the complex 2 and 3, respectively. The residue obtained from ther-
mal degradation of the heterobimetallic complex 4 corresponds
to 1/4 mole of metallic copper (5.3%) and 1/2 mole of copper
oxide (12.62%) under nitrogen and air atmospheres, respectively.
These results indicate that ligand moiety (dadb) around copper and
zinc metal ions undergo degradation according to scheme A and
B, respectively, in heterobimetallic complex 4. Further, since the
copper and zinc metal ions are expected to be in alternate posi-
tion in the polymeric chain, therefore, HCl molecules liberated by
with zinc metal ions and form ZnCl2 and subsequent fragmenta-
tion follows. Thus, all the zinc metal ions are expected to form
zinc chloride which is evaporated/volatilized whose boiling point
[30] is 732 ◦Cs and the residue corresponds to copper metal/copper
oxide depending upon the environment under which degradation
is taking place. For the equimolar mixture of 2 and 3, the final
residue is expected to be ∼10.55% consistent with composition 1/4
mole of copper and 1/4 mole of zinc metal ion following respec-
tive degradation pattern of complexes 2 and 3, respectively, under
nitrogen atmosphere. Similarly under air atmosphere the residue
is expected to be consistent with composition 1/2 mole of copper
oxide and 1/4 mole of zinc oxide following respective degrada-
tion pattern of the complexes 2 and 3. These thermal degradation
results do not match with residue obtained from the complex 4
further confirms the distinct identity of heterobimetallic complex
4 rather than equimolar mixture of 2 and 3. Similarly, residue
obtained from degradation of complex 5 also can be explained. A
careful observation of TGA and DTA curves indicate that each of the
complexes follows its characteristics thermal degradation curves
depending upon amount of respective metal ion contribution
into it.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] R.L. Prasad, A. Kushwaha, Suchita, M. Kumar, R.A. Yadav, Spectrochim. Acta A
69 (2008) 304–311, and references therein.
[2] S. Kulpe, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B-Struct. Sci. 25 (1969) 1411–1416.
[3] S. Kulpe, D. Leupold, S. Daehne, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 5 (1966) 599–600.
[4] R.L. Prasad, A. Kushwaha, R.J. Butcher (communicated).
[5] S. Kawata, S. Kitagawa, I. Furuchi, C. Kudo, H. Kamesaki, M. Kondo, M. Katada,
M. Munakata, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 274 (1995) 179–185.
[6] C. Creutz, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 (1973) 1086–1094.
[7] M.D. Ward, Chem. Soc. Rev. 24 (1995) 121–134.
[8] T. Yamamoto, T. Maruyama, Z-h. Zhou, T. Ito, T. Fukuda, Y. Yoneda, F. Begum, T.
Ikeda, S. Sasaki, H. Takezoe, A. Fukuda, K. Kubota, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994)
4832–4845.
[9] G.G. Condorelli, G. Malandrino, I. Fragala, Chem. Mater. 7 (1995) 2096–2103.
[10] P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M. Taracon, Nature 407 (2000)
496–499.
[11] A.H. Mac Donald, Nature 414 (2001) 409–410.
[12] R.V. Kumar, Y. Diamant, A. Gedanken, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 2301–2305.
[13] X.P. Gao, J.L. Bao, G.L. Pan, H.Y. Zhu, P.X. Huang, F. Wu, D.Y. Song, J. Phys. Chem.
B 108 (2004) 5547–5551.
[14] T. Maruyama, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 56 (1998) 85–92.
[15] J. Ramirez-Ortiz, T. Ogura, J. Medina-Valtierra, S.E. Acosta-Ortiz, P. Bosch, J.A.
De Los Reyes, V.H. Lara, Appl. Surf. Sci. 174 (2001) 177–184.
[16] Y.W. Cao, R. Jin, C.A. Mirkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 7961–7962.
[17] M. Cao, C. Hu, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, C. Guoa, E. Wanga, Chem. Commun. (2003)
1884–1885.
[18] T. Allmendinger, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 198 (1997) 4019–4034.
[19] B.S. Furmiss, A.J. Hannaford, B. Rogers, P.W.G. Smith, A.R. Tatchell, Vogel’s Text
Book of Practical Organic Chemistry, 4th ed., ELBS, 1978.
[20] L.F. Fieser, E.L. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57 (1935) 1844–1849.
[21] J.V. Folgado, R. Ibanez, E. Coronado, D. Beltran, J.M. Savariault, J. Galy, Inorg.
Chem. 27 (1988) 19–26.
[22] K. Nakamoto, Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Com-
pounds, 5th ed., Wiley Interscience, New York, 1997.
[23] L.V. Azaroff, M.J. Buerger, The Powder Method in X-ray Crystallography,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958, p. 119.
Acknowledgements
[24] S.A. sallam, Trans. Met. Chem. 31 (2006) 46–55.
Authors are thankful to Head, Department of Chemistry for
providing laboratory facilities, magnetic moment measurements,
recording of IR, UV–visible spectra and DSC thermograms. Finan-
cial assistant from UGC New Delhi in form of a project is gratefully
acknowledged. Thanks are also due to SAIF, Madras and Cochin for
providing TGA, DTG and DTA thermograms. Last but not least the
authors are thankful to the reviewers for their useful comments
and clarifying our understanding on our observed non-ideal TGA
and DTA curves.
[25] B.N. Figgis, J. Lewis, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 6 (1964) 37–239.
[26] F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo, M. Bochmann, Advanced Inorganic
Chemistry, 6th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999, p. 714.
[27] A.B.P. Lever, Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986, p.
376.
[28] A.M. Sladkov, L.Y. Ukhin, Russ. Chem. Rev. 37 (1968) 748–763.
[29] Z. Yang, J. Xu, W. Zhang, A. Liu, S. Tang, J. Solid State Chem. 180 (2007)
1390–1396.
[30] J.A. Dean (Ed.), Langes’s Handbook of Chemistry, 13th International ed.,
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New Delhi, 1987.