6224 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 26, 1999
Yao et al.
difficult to compare the position of the transition states for
enolization along the reaction coordinates, because bond break-
age (charge transfer) is not synchronous with electron delocal-
ization, and thus there is no single reaction parameter that can
describe the position of an imbalanced transition state. However,
if we define “position” as the degree of proton transfer, âcorr
may be used as an estimate of the position of the transition
state in the acetate reaction. In the deprotonation of 2-tetralones
by acetate ion, the corrected âcorr of 0.45 implies that the
transition state is approximately halfway along the reaction
coordinate. However, the lack of a â value for the hydroxide
ion reaction makes it impossible to directly compare the
positions of the two transition states.
The calculated structures of the transition states for enolization
by acetate and by hydroxide ion are similar, but these calcula-
tions involve some approximations and are thus imprecise. The
use of R values to estimate the extent of proton transfer is
complicated by the existence of transition state imbalance.
However, the similar magnitude of the imbalance for the two
transition states should enable a qualitative comparison of the
two R values. Thus, the more negative R (0.78) for proton
abstraction by acetate than by hydroxide (0.60) suggests a later
transition state for the acetate reaction. Similar phenomena have
been observed in the other proton-transfer reactions.27
Transition State Imbalance and Enzymatic Enolization.
It is of interest to estimate the contribution of transition state
imbalance to the intrinsic barrier for the proton transfer of
2-tetralones to acetate ion, and therefore whether minimization
of this transition state imbalance could be significant in an
enzymatic acceleration of enolization. Bernasconi2c has proposed
a mathematical relationship between a change of the intrinsic
rate constant for a reaction and the imbalance in the reaction.
For a reaction that leads to a resonance-stabilized carbanion,
res
the intrinsic rate constant is given by eq 5,31 where δ log ko
is the difference between the intrinsic rate constant for the
reaction in question and a hypothetical reaction of the same
pKa without resonance stabilization of the anion, λres is the
fraction of the charge that is delocalized in the transition state
relative to the product, â is the total amount of charge transferred
in the transition state (equivalent to the Brønsted â), and δ log
Kares is the difference in pKa between the acid and a hypothetical
acid with no resonance stabilization.
δ log kores ) (λres - â) δ log Kares
(5)
For enolization of 2-tetralone by acetate ion, the corrected
value of â is 0.45, and λres is 60% âcorr, or 0.27. The contribution
of resonance stabilization from the phenyl and carbonyl groups
to the increased acidity of 2-tetralone (δ log Kares) relative to
methane (pKa ∼50)32 can be estimated from the relative
contributions of resonance and inductive effects to the electron-
withdrawing nature of these substituents. To do this, we use
σ- as a measure of the sum of the resonance and inductive
effects and σ as a measure of the inductive effect. Thus, the
fraction of resonance stabilization from both groups is calculated
Intrinsic Barriers for Proton Transfer of 2-Tetralone by
Acetate Ion. The slow rate of abstraction of protons from carbon
atoms adjacent to carbonyl groups has been attributed to
relatively high barriers to reaction that exist even when the
reaction is thermodynamically favorable.1,2 Marcus28 has dis-
sected the kinetic barrier (∆Gq) for a reaction into an intrinsic
barrier (∆Gintq) and a thermodynamic barrier (∆G°) (eq 4).
res
through ∑i(σ- - σi)/∑iσ- ) 43%, and δ log ko ) (0.27-
i
i
∆Gq ) ∆Gintq(1 + ∆G°/4∆Gintq)2 ) ∆Gintq + ∆G°/2 +
0.45) × (43% × 37) ) -2.9. This value corresponds to an
increase in the intrinsic barrier of 4 kcal/mol over that for a
hypothetical balanced transition state.
(∆G°)2/16∆Gint ≈ ∆Gintq + ∆G°/2 (4)
q
We6 have suggested that the rate enhancement for the
isomerization of 5-androstene-3,17-dione by steroid isomerase
(KSI) is due to contributions from lowering of both the
thermodynamic barrier (by ca. 11 kcal/mol, of which ca. 5 kcal/
mol shows up in the transition state) and the intrinsic barrier
(by ca. 3 kcal/mol). Thus, although the predominant mode of
catalysis by KSI involves a decrease in the thermodynamic
barrier, there is a substantial contribution from a decreased
intrinsic barrier, which could be accomplished by minimization
of transition state imbalance. The source of the high intrinsic
barriers in these reactions may be attributed to a combination
of two causes.33 One is the incomplete rehybridization of the
incipient p-orbital at C-1 in the transition state,7,34 which limits
delocalization of the negative charge transferred at the transition
state. The other is a delay in solvent reorganization around the
Because the intrinsic barrier for a proton-transfer reaction, in
principle, describes the rate of the reaction at ∆pKa ) 0
(difference between the acid and the base), it is simplest to
determine it from the Brønsted correlation by extrapolation.
Application of this method to the substituted acetate data (Figure
2) gives the intrinsic rate constant (ko) for 2-tetralone (260 M-1
s-1),29 which can be converted to an intrinsic barrier (∆Go ) of
q
about 14 kcal/mol. Thus, the barrier for deprotonation of
2-tetralone by acetate (20 kcal/mol, k-2 ) 13.7 × 10-3 M-1
s-1) is composed of this intrinsic barrier (14 kcal/mol) and about
half of the thermodynamic barrier (11/2 ) 6 kcal/mol).30 The
total barrier for proton transfer to hydroxide is about 14 kcal/
mol (k ) 376 M-1 s-1).7 The intrinsic barrier for this reaction
(16 kcal/mol) can be estimated from eq 4 and the ∆pK of ca. 3
for water and 2-tetralone. The similar intrinsic barriers for
deprotonation by hydroxide ion and acetate ion are consistent
with a similar transition state imbalance for both reactions.2
(31) Bernasconi has further generalized this equation to quantitate the
increase of the intrinsic barrier of a reaction caused by the transition state
imbalance from any factor.2c
(27) (a) Jencks, W. P.; Haber, M. T.; Herschlag, D.; Nazaretian, K. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 479. (b) Murray, C. J.; Jencks, W. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1880.
(28) (a) Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 966. (b) Marcus, R. A.
J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 867. (c) Marcus, R. A. Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem.
1964, 15, 155.
(29) The intrinsic rate constant (ko) was corrected for a statistical factor
of 2. The relative pKaK of 2-tetralone and acetate was assumed to be invariant
in H2O and D2O.
(32) Pross, A. Theoretical and Physical Principles of Organic ReactiVity;
John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995; p 200.
(33) The additional delay in conjugation with the phenyl ring with C-1
at the transition state could lead to a further increase in the intrinsic barrier.
There is an increase (2-3 kcal/mol) of the intrinsic barrier for deprotonation
of 2-tetralone by hydroxide ion over those for enolization of acetone (13
kcal/mol: Albery, W. J. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1982, 78, 1579)
and for enolization of simple aldehydes and ketones (12.1 kcal/mol: Guthrie,
J. P. Can. J. Chem. 1979, 57, 1177). It is likely that the higher intrinsic
barrier for enolization of 2-tetralone is caused by the phenyl ring fused to
the R carbon of the carbonyl group. Thus, enolization involves conjugation
of a p-orbital at C-1 with the carbonyl group and the phenyl group, both of
which are important in stabilizing the enolate of 2-tetralone.9
(34) Kresge, A. J. Can. J. Chem. 1974, 52, 1897.
(30) According to eq 4, the effect of the thermodynamic barrier on the
energy of the transition state can be estimated as half of the thermodynamic
barrier (∆G°/2) by ignoring the small interaction between the thermody-
namic barrier and the intrinsic barrier for this specific enolization of
2-tetralone [(∆G°)2/16∆Gint ) 0.5 kcal/mol].
q